Download presentation

1
**Some examples in Cournot Competition**

2
**Cournot Duopoly A duopoly with inverse demand**

P = a-bQ (P/Q:market price/quantity) ci: the constant marginal cost of Firm i Each firm chooses qi to max. its profit Firm 1 chooses q1 to Max (a-bQ-c1)q1 Firm 2 chooses q2 to Max (a-bQ-c2)q2

3
**A simultaneous-move game**

N.E.(q1*, q2*) solves the simultaneous eqs. (2 first-order conditions) a-2bq1-bq2-c1 = (A) a-bq1-2bq2-c2 = (B) q1*=(a-2c1+c2)/3b q2*=(a+c1-2c2)/3b

4
**Stackelberg Competition**

A similar game where Firm 1 acts first with his actions observed by Firm 2. (A leader and a follower in the same industry. A sequential-move game) From Firm 2’s F.O.C, equation (B), Firm 2’s best response to every q1 is q2=(a-bq1-c2)/(2b) →q2(q1) q2(q1) captures the equilibrium in every subgame of q1 (there’s a subgame after Firm 1 announces q1 )

5
**Firm 1 takes this into account (foreseeing that q2=q2(q1)) and chooses q1 to max its profit**

Max [a-b(q1+q2)-c1]q1 s.t. q2=q2(q1) →simply replace q2 with q2(q1) SPNE q1*=(a-2c1+c2)/(2b) q2*=q2(q1*)=(a+2c1-3c2)/(4b)

6
**Static Cournot with asymmetric info.**

The problem with asymmetric info. →the game is no longer common knowledge Static (Simultaneous-move) Bayesian Games (Harsanyi) Assume with probability t, c1=cH, and (1-t) c1=cL. (Firm 1 also knows this is how Firm 2 expects Firm 1’s costs though Firm 1 knows exactly its own cost. First consider a slightly different game where even Firm 1 doesn’t know its own cost before the game is played but soon it will realize after the nature has made a choice. So that we can interpret the original game in this way.

7
**Firm 2 has only 1 information set because it is a simultaneous-move game**

q1H t cH Nature q2 cL 1-t 1 q1L

8
A N.E. will specify what Firm 1 will do when cH and when cL, and what Firm 2 will do. It’s like now a 3-player game. Indeed Firm 1 with high cost will (it competes with q2, not q1L) max [a-b(q1H+q2)-cH]q1H →q1H=(a-bq2-cH)/(2b)………….(I1) Similary Firm 1 with low cost will max [a-b(q1L+q2)-cL]q1L →q1L=(a-bq2-cL)/(2b)…………..(I2)

9
**Firm 2 will maximize (with prob**

Firm 2 will maximize (with prob. t it’s competing with q1H, and 1-t with q1L) t[a-bq1H-bq2-c2]q2+(1-t)[a-bq1L-bq2-c2]q2 →q2=[a-c2-tbq1H-(1-t)bq1L]/(2b)…(I3) The N.E. is (q1H, q1L, q2) that solves (I1),(I2) and (I3) simultaneously.

10
**q2*=[a-2c2+tcH+(1-t)cL]/(3b]**

q1H*=[2a+2c2-(3+t)cH-(1-t)cL]/(6b) q1L*=[2a+2c2-tcH-(4-t)cL]/(6b) One can compare the result to the deterministic cases with low-cost/high-cost Firm 1 to see the differences in price/quantity.

11
We’ll see a similar game when we introduce auction where all players have private information regarding its own valuation toward to item on auction and they have to bid simultaneously.

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Stackelberg –życie i wkład do nauki (teoria gier).

Stackelberg –życie i wkład do nauki (teoria gier).

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on nitrogen cycle and nitrogen fixation meaning Ppt on abstract art Mp ppt online counselling 2013 Ppt on pricing strategy in retail Ppt on asymptotic notation of algorithms examples Ppt on famous indian entrepreneurs Ppt on natural disasters for class 5 Ppt on mahatma gandhi movements Ppt on marie curie timeline Ppt on understanding by design