Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byDamon Nadler Modified over 2 years ago

1
ME 4135 Robotics & Control R. Lindeke, Ph. D.

2
FKS vs. IKS In FKS we built a tool for finding end frame geometry from Given Joint data: In IKS we need Joint models from given End Point Geometry: Joint Space Cartesian Space Joint Space Cartesian Space

3
So this IKS is Nasty (as we know!) It a more difficult problem because: The Equation set is “Over-Specified” 12 equations in 6 unknowns Space is “Under-Specified” Planer devices with more joints than 2 The Solution set can contain Redundancies Multiple solutions The Solution Sets may be un-defined Unreachable in 1 or many joints

4
Uses of IKS Builds Workspace Allows “Off-Line Programming” solutions Thus, compares Workspace capabilities with Programming realities to assure that execution is feasible Aids in Workplace design and operation simulations

5
Performing IKS For (mostly) Industrial Robots: First lets consider the previously defined Spherical Wrist simplification All Wrist joint Z’s intersect at a point The nth Frame is offset from this intersection by a distance d n along the a vector of the desired solution (3 rd column of desired orientation sub- matrix) This result is as expected by following the DH Algorithm!

6
Performing IKS We can now separate the effects of the ARM joints Joints 1 to 3 in a full function manipulator (without redundant joints) They function to position the spherical wrist at a target POSITION related to the desired target POSE … From the WRIST Joints Joints 4 to 6 in a full functioning spherical wrist Wrist Joints function as the primary tool to ORIENT the end frame as required by the desired target POSE

7
Performing IKS: Focus on Positioning We will define a point (the WRIST CENTER) as: P c = [P x, P y, P z ] Here we define P c = d target - d n *a P x = d target,x - d n *a x P y = d target,y - d n *a y P z = d target,z - d n *a z

8
R Manipulator – a simple and special case which can be found by doing a ‘Pure IKS’ solution R Frame Skeleton

9
LP Table and A i ’sFramesLinkVarda SSSS CCCC S C 0 → 1 1R + 90 009010C1-S1 1 → 2 2P0 d2 + cl2 001010

10
FKS is A1*A2:

11
Forming The IKS:

12
Examining these two equation (n, o, a and d are ‘givens’ in an inverse sense!!!): Term (1, 4) & (2,4) both side allow us to find an equation for as a positioning joint in the arm: (1,4): C1*(d 2 +cl 2 ) = d x (2,4): S1*(d 2 +cl 2 ) = d y Form a ratio to build Tan( ): S1/C1 = d y / d x Tan = d y /d x = Atan2(d x, d y )

13
Forming The IKS: After is found, back substitute and solve for d 2 : (1,4): C1*(d 2 +cl 2 ) = d x Isolating d 2 : d 2 = [d x /C1] - cl 2

14
Alternative Method – doing a pure inverse approach Form A 1 -1 then pre-multiply both side by this ‘inverse’ Leads to: A 2 = A 1 -1 *T 0 n given

15
Simplify RHS means:

16
Solving: Selecting and Equating (1,4) 0 = -S1*d x + C1*d y Solving: S1*d x = C1*d y Tan( ) = (S1/C1) = (d y /d x ) = Atan2(d x, d y ) Selecting and Equating (3,4) -- after back substituting solution d 2 + cl 2 = C1*d x + S1*d y d 2 = C1*d x + S1*d y - cl 2

17
Performing IKS For Industrial Robots: What we saw with the -R IKS solutions will always work for a robot – with or without a spherical wrist These methods are often tedious – and require some form of “intelligent application” to find a good IKS solution Hence that is why we like the spherical wrist simplification (for industrial robots) introduced earlier – separating ARM and Wrist Effects and joints

18
Focusing on the ARM Manipulators in terms of P c : Prismatic: q 1 = P z (its along Z 0 !) – cl1 q 2 = P x or P y - cl2 q 3 = P y or P x - cl3 Cylindrical: 1 = Atan2(P x, P y ) d 2 = P z – cl2 d 3 = P x *C1 – cl3 or +(P x 2 + P y 2 ).5 – cl3

19
Focusing on the ARM Manipulators in terms of P c : Spherical: 1 = Atan2(Px, Py) 2 = Atan2( (P x 2 + P y 2 ).5, P z ) D3 = (P x 2 + P y 2 + P z 2 ).5 – cl3

20
Focusing on the ARM Manipulators in terms of P c : Articulating: 1 = Atan2(Px, Py) 3 = Atan2(D, (1 – D 2 ).5 ) Where D = 2 = - is: Atan2((Px 2 + Py 2 ).5, P z ) is:

21
One Further Complication: This can be considered the d 2 offset problem A d 2 offset is a design issue that states that the nth frame has a non-zero offset along the Y 0 axis as observed in the solution of the T 0 n with all joints at home This leads to two solutions for 1 the So-Called Shoulder Left and Shoulder Right solutions

22
Defining the d 2 Offset issue Here: ‘The ARM’ might be a revolute/prismatic device as in the Stanford Arm or it might be a 2 & a 3 links in an Articulating Arm and rotates out of plane A d2 offset means that there are two places where 1 can be placed to touch a given point (and note, when 1 is at Home, the wrist center is not on the X0 axis!)

23
Lets look at this Device “From the Top” a Q 11 F1F1

24
Solving For 1 We will have a Choice (of two) poses for :

25
In this so-called “Hard Arm” We have two 1 ’s These lead to two 2 ’s (Spherical) Or to four 2 ’s and 3 ’s in the Articulating Arm Shoulder Right Elbow Up & Down Shoulder Left Elbow Up & Down

26
The Orientation Model Evolves from: Separates Arm Joint and Wrist Joint Contribution to the desiredTarget (given) orientation

27
Focusing on Orientation Issues Lets begin by considering Euler Angles (they are a model that is almost identical to a full functioning Spherical Wrist): Form Product: R z1 *R y2 *R z3 This becomes R 3 6

28
Euler Wrist Simplified: And this matrix is equal to a U matrix prepared by multiplying the inverse of the ARM joint orientation matrices inverse and the Desired (given) target orientation NOTE: R 0 3 is Manipulator Arm dependent!

29
Simplifying the RHS: (our so- called U Matrix)

30
Continuing:

31
Finally:

32
Solving for Individual Orientation Angles (1 st ): Selecting (3,3) → C = U 33 With C we “know” S = (1-C 2 ).5 Hence: = Atan2(U 33, (1-U 33 2 ).5 NOTE: 2 solutions for !

33
Re-examining the Matrices: To solve for : Select terms: (1,3) & (2,3) C S = U 13 S S = U 23 Dividing the 2 nd by the 1 st : S /C = U 23 /U 13 Tan( ) = U 23 /U 13 = Atan2(U 13, U 23 )

34
Continuing our Solution: To solve for : Select terms: (3,1) & (3,2) -S C = U 31 S S = U 32 Tan( ) = U 32 /-U 31 = Atan2(-U 31, U 32 )

35
Summarizing: = Atan2(U 33, (1-U 33 2 ).5 = Atan2(U 13, U 23 ) = Atan2(-U 31, U 32 )

36
Let do a (true) Spherical Wrist:

37
IKSing the Spherical Wrist FramesLinkVarda 3 → 4 4R 444400-90 4 → 5 5R 555500+90 5 → 6 6R 6666 d6d6d6d600

38
Writing The Solution:

39
Lets See By Pure Inverse Technique:

40
Simplifying

41
Solving: Examination here lets select (3,3) both sides: 0 = C4U 23 – S4U 13 S4U 13 = C4U 23 Tan( 4 ) = S4/C4 = U 23 /U 13 4 = Atan2(U 13, U 23 ) With the given desired orientation and values (from the arm joints) we have a value for 4 the RHS is completely known

42
Solving for 5 & 6 For 5 : Select (1,3) & (2,3) terms S5 = C4U 13 + S4U 23 C5 = U 33 Tan( 5 ) = S5/C5 = (C4U 13 + S4U 23 )/U 33 5 = Atan2(U 33, C4U 13 + S4U 23 ) For 6 : Select (3,1) & (3, 2) S6 = C4U 21 – S4U 11 C6 = C4U 22 – S4U 12 Tan( 6 ) = S6/C6 = ([C4U 21 – S4U 11 ],[C4U 22 – S4U 12 ]) 6 = Atan2 ([C4U 21 – S4U 11 ], [C4U 22 – S4U 12 ])

43
Summarizing: 4 = Atan2(U 13, U 23 ) 5 = Atan2(U 33, C4U 13 + S4U 23 ) 6 = Atan2 ([C4U 21 – S4U 11 ], [C4U 22 – S4U 12 ])

44
Lets Try One: Cylindrical Robot w/ Spherical Wrist Given a Target matrix (it’s an IKS after all!) The d 3 “constant” is 400mm; the d 6 offset (call it the ‘Hand Span’) is 150 mm. 1 = Atan2((d x – a x *150),(d y -a y *150)) d2 = (dz – a z *150) d3 = [(d x – a x *150) 2,(d y -a y *150) 2 ].5 - 400

45
The Frame Skeleton: Note “Dummy” Frame to account for Orientation problem with Spherical Wrist modeled earlier

46
Solving for U: NOTE: We needed a “Dummy Frame” to account for the Orientation issue at the end of the Arm

47
Simplifying:

48
Subbing U ij ’s Into Spherical Wrist Joint Models: 4 = Atan2(U 13, U 23 ) = Atan2((C1a x + S1a z ), (S1a x -C1a z )) 5 = Atan2(U 33, C4U 13 + S4U 23 ) = Atan2{a y, [C4(C1a x +S1a z ) + S4 (S1a x -C1a z )]} 6 = Atan2 ([C4U 21 - S4U 11 ], [C4U 22 - S4U 12 ]) = Atan2{[C4(S1n x -C1n z ) - S4(C1n x +S1n z )], [C4(S1o x -C1o z ) - S4(C1o x +S1o z )]}

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

KINEMATICS ANALYSIS OF ROBOTS (Part 2)

KINEMATICS ANALYSIS OF ROBOTS (Part 2)

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on structure of chromosomes Ppt on do's and don'ts of group discussion questions Ppt on credit policy for customers Ppt on diffusion of innovation Ppt on earth movements and major landforms in europe Ppt on abo blood groupings Ppt on social contract theory examples Cell surface display ppt on tv Ppt on census 2001 Ppt on old age homes in india