Download presentation

1
**Fast Marching on Triangulated Domains**

Computer Science Department Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Fast Marching on Triangulated Domains Ron Kimmel Geometric Image Processing Lab

2
**Brief Historical Review**

Upwind schemes: Godunov 59 Level sets: Osher & Sethian 88 Viscosity SFS: Rouy & Tourin 92, (Osher & Rudin) Level sets SFS: Kimmel & Bruckstein 92 Continuous morphology: Brockett & Maragos 92,Sapiro et al. 93 Minimal geodesics: Kimmel, Amir & Bruckstein 93 Fast marching method: Sethian 95 Fast optimal path: Tsitsiklis 95 Level sets on triangulated domains:Barth & Sethian 98 Fast marching on triangulated domains: Kimmel & Sethian 98 Applications based on joint works with: Elad, Kiryati, Zigelman

3
**1D Distance: Example 1 T(x) x x0 Find distance T(x), given T(x0)=0.**

Solution: T(x)=|x-x0|. except at x0. T(x) x x0

4
**1D Distance: Example 2 T(x) x x0 x1**

Find the distance T(x), given T(x0)=T(x1)=0 Solution: T(x) = min{|x-x0|,|x-x1|}, Again, , except x0,x1 and (x0+x1)/2. T(x) x x0 x1

5
**1D Eikonal Equation T(x) x x0 x1**

with boundary conditions T(x0)=T(x1)=0. Goal: Compute T that satisfies the equation `the best'. T(x) x x0 x1

6
**Numerical Approximation**

Restrict , where h= grid spacing. Possible solutions for are T(x) x x0 x1

7
**Approximation II T(x) x x0 x1 Updated i has always**

`upwind' from where the `wind blows' T(x) x x0 x1

8
**Update Procedure T T T Set , and T(x0)=T(x1)=0.**

REPEAT UNTIL convergence, FOR each i T i T i+1 T i-1 i-1 i i+1 h

9
**Update Order What is the optimal order of updates?**

Solution I: Scan the line successively left to right. N scans, i.e. O(N ) Solution II: Left to right followed by right to left. Two scans are sufficient. (Danielson`s distance map 1980) Solution III: Start from x0, update its neighboring points, accept updated values, and update their neighbors, etc. 2 1 2 3 1 2

10
**Weighted Domains x x0 x1 Local weight , Arclength**

Goal: distance function characterized by: By the chain rule: The Eikonal equation is T(x) F(x) x x0 x1

11
**2D Rectangular Grids Isotropic inhomogeneous domains**

Weighted arclength: the weight is Goal: Compute the distance T(x,y) from p0 where

12
**Upwind Approximation in 2D**

ij T i+1,j T i,j-1 i+1,j T i,j-1 i+1,j T i-1,j ij i-1,j i,j+1

13
**2D Approximation T T Initialization: given initial value or Update:**

Fitting a tilted plane with gradient , and two values anchored at the relevant neighboring grid points. T 1 i+1,j T 2 i,j-1 ij i-1,j i,j+1

14
**Computational Complexity**

T is systematically constructed from smaller to larger T values. Update of a heap element is O(log N). Thus, upper bound of the total is O(N log N).

15
**Shortest Path on Flat Domains**

Why do graph search based algorithms (like Dijkstra's) fail?

16
**Edge Integration Cohen-Kimmel, IJCV, 1997.**

Solve the 2D Eikonal equation given T(p)=0 Minimal geodesic w.r.t.

17
**Shape from Shading Rouy-Tourin SIAM-NU 1992,**

Kimmel-Bruckstein CVIU 1994, Kimmel-Sethian JMIV 2001. Solve the 2D Eikonal equation where Minimal geodesic w.r.t.

18
**Path Planning 3 DOF Solve the Eikonal Eq. in 3D {x,y,j}-CS**

given T(x0,y0,j0)=0, Minimal geodesic w.r.t.

19
Path Planning 3 DOF

20
**Path Planning 4 DOF Solve the Eikonal Eq. in 4D**

Minimal geodesic w.r.t.

21
**Update Acute Angle Given ABC, update C. Consistency and monotonicity:**

Update only `from within the triangle' h in ABC Find t=EC that satisfies the gradient approximation (t-u)/h= F. c c

22
**Update Procedure We end up with: t must satisfy u<t, and h in ABC.**

The update procedure is IF (u<t) AND (a cos q < b(t-u)/t < a/cosq) THEN T(C) = min {T(C),t+T(A)}; ELSE T(C)= min {T(C),bF+T(A),aF+T(B)}. u C B A

23
**Obtuse Problems This front first meets B, next A, and only then C.**

A is `supported’ by a single point. The supported section of incoming fronts is a limited section.

24
**Solution by splitting Initialization step!**

Extend this section and link the vertex to one within the extended section. Recursive unfolding: Unfold until a new vertex Q is found. Initialization step!

25
**Recursive Unfolding: Complexity**

e = length of longest edge The extended section maximal area is bounded by a<= e /(2a ). The minimal area of any unfolded triangle is bounded below a >= (h a ) q /2, The number of unfolded triangles before Q is found is bounded by m<= a /a = e /(q h a ). max 2 max min 2 min min min min 2 2 3 max min max min min min

26
**1st Order Accuracy The accuracy for acute triangles is O(e )**

Accuracy for the obtuse case O(e /(p-q )) max max max

27
Minimal Geodesics

28
Minimal Geodesics

29
Linear Interpolation ODE ‘back tracking’

30
**Quadratic Interpolation**

31
**Voronoi Diagrams and Offsets**

Given n points, { p D, j 0,..,n-1} Voronoi region: G = {p D| d(p,p ) < d(p,p ), V j = i}. j i i j

32
**Geodesic Voronoi Diagrams and Geodesic Offsets**

33
**Geodesic Voronoi Diagrams and Geodesic Offsets**

34
Marching Triangles The intersection set of two functions is linearly interpolated via `marching triangle'

35
**Voronoi Diagrams and Offsets on Weighted Curved Domains**

36
**Voronoi Diagrams and Offsets on Weighted Curved Domains**

37
**Cheap and Fast 3D Scanner**

PC + video frame grabber. Video camera. Laser line pointer. Joint with G. Zigelman motivated by simple shape from structure light methods, like Bouguet-Perona 99, Klette et al. 98 Lego Mindstorms rotates the laser (E. Gordon) A frame grabber built at the Technion by Y Grinberg

38
**Cheap and Fast 3D Scanner**

39
**Detection and Reconstruction**

40
**Examples of Decimation**

Decimation - 3% of vertices Sub-grid sampling

41
Results

42
Results

43
**Texture Mapping Environment mapping: Blinn, Newell (76).**

Environment mapping: Greene, Bier and Sloan (86). Free-form surfaces: Arad and Elber (97). Polyhedral surfaces: Floater (96, 98), Levy and Mallet (98). Multi-dimensional scaling: Schwartz, Shaw and Wolfson (89).

44
**Difficulties Need for user intervention. Local and global distortions.**

Restrictive boundary conditions. High computational complexity.

45
**Flattening via MDS Compute geodesic distances between pairs of points.**

Construct a square distance matrix of geodesic distances^2. Find the coordinates in the plane via multi-dimensional scaling. The simplest is `classical scaling’. Use the flattened coordinates for texturing the surface, while preserving the texture features. Zigelman, Kimmel, Kiryati, IEEE T. on Visualization and Computer Graphics (in press).

46
Flattening

47
Flattening

48
**Distances - comparison**

49
Texture Mapping

50
Texture Mapping

51
**Bending Invariant Signatures**

52
**Bending Invariant Signatures**

? Elad, Kimmel, CVPR’2001

53
**Bending Invariant Signatures**

? Elad, Kimmel, CVPR’2001

54
**Bending Invariant Signatures**

? Elad, Kimmel, CVPR’2001

55
**Bending Invariant Signatures**

Elad, Kimmel, CVPR’2001

56
**Bending Invariant Signatures**

Elad, Kimmel, CVPR’2001

57
**Bending Invariant Signatures**

3 Original surfaces Canonical surfaces in R Elad, Kimmel, CVPR’2001

58
**Bending Invariant Clustering**

2nd moments based MDS for clustering Original surfaces Canonical forms D D D 0.8 A A E 0.8 E 0.7 A 0.7 D E 0.6 E B 0.6 E E E 0.5 C C C 0.5 C D C C 0.4 B C 0.4 D D E D 0.3 F A 0.3 B B B B 0.2 F B B C 0.2 A A A A 0.1 F 0.1 F 1 1 1 0.8 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 *A=human body 0.8 F F F 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.6 F 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 *B=hand 0.2 0.2 *C=paper *D=hat *E=dog *F=giraffe Elad, Kimmel, CVPR’2001

59
**More Applications semi-manual re-triangulation segmentation**

halftoning in 3D Adi, Kimmel 2002

60
Conclusions Applications of Fast Marching Method on rectangular grids: Path planning, edge integration, shape from shading. O(N) consistent method for weighted geodesic distance: ‘Fast marching on triangulated domains’. Applications: Minimal geodesics, geodesic offsets, geodesic Voronoi diagrams, surface flattening, texture mapping, bending invariant signatures and clustering of surfaces, triangulation, and semi-manual segmentation.

Similar presentations

OK

1 Michael M. Bronstein Partial similarity of objects 17 December 2006 Partial similarity of objects, or how to compare a centaur to a horse Michael M.

1 Michael M. Bronstein Partial similarity of objects 17 December 2006 Partial similarity of objects, or how to compare a centaur to a horse Michael M.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on organic chemistry-some basic principles and techniques Economics ppt on lpg Ppt on self awareness activity Ppt on energy conservation act 2001 Ppt on viruses and bacteria lesson Ppt on second law of thermodynamics example Ppt on natural resources conservation Ppt on water scarcity definition Ppt on social networking sites advantages and disadvantages Ppt on english language learning