Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

TEŽAVNOST: 200 Microsoft Solutions Framework – MSF v4 Rafal Lukawiecki Strategic Consultant Project Botticelli Ltd This presentation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "TEŽAVNOST: 200 Microsoft Solutions Framework – MSF v4 Rafal Lukawiecki Strategic Consultant Project Botticelli Ltd This presentation."— Presentation transcript:

1 TEŽAVNOST: 200 Microsoft Solutions Framework – MSF v4 Rafal Lukawiecki Strategic Consultant Project Botticelli Ltd This presentation is based on work by Microsoft TechNet, MSDN and various Microsoft authors including, with special thanks: Ramprabhu Rathnam, Tony Northrup, and Austin Wilson

2 TEŽAVNOST: 2002 Objectives Convince you that non-technical reasons impact project success a lot Show you an approach to product management that has proven to be very successful Explain the recent developments

3 TEŽAVNOST: 2003 Agenda Introduction to Frameworks Components of MSF v3 and v4 Future

4 TEŽAVNOST: 2004 Introduction: Why Projects Fail? What are Frameworks?

5 TEŽAVNOST: 2005 MSF Microsoft Solutions Framework –Established in 1991, made public in 1993 (v1), fully revised in 1998 (v2), January 2003 (v3) and now in March 2006 (v4) –Product development framework for creating software and infrastructure deployment Related to MOF, Microsoft Operational Framework –Which concentrates on the management of IT infrastructure

6 TEŽAVNOST: 2006 IT Lifecycle Microsoft Operations Framework Microsoft Solutions Framework Operate Deploy Build Plan

7 TEŽAVNOST: 2007 Does it Work? Yes, as long as you chose the right bits of MSF for your project High-profile projects that used MSF –www.nasdaq.com and (Aris Corp, now Ciber, –UK Government Gateway (eGov) –Visual Studio, Windows 2003, Windows XP

8 TEŽAVNOST: 2008 What’s a Framework? Unlike a methodology, a framework is a set of conceptual tools and best practices However, in many ways MSF v4 is closer to a methodology than v3

9 TEŽAVNOST: 2009 “When projects fail, it’s rarely technical.” Jim Johnson, The Standish Group Root Causes of Failure Separation of goal and function Separation of business and technology Lack of common language and process Failure to communicate and act as a team Processes that are inflexible to change Solution? –A good and tested framework! Average cost overrun: 45% Time overrun: 63% Functionality delivered on average: 67% Standish Group

10 TEŽAVNOST: Evolution from MSF v3 to v4

11 TEŽAVNOST: MSF Partner Council Who Advised v4

12 TEŽAVNOST: Evolution to MSF v4

13 TEŽAVNOST: Status MSF v3 is fully released and available –Study course MOC #1846 MSF v4 for Application Development (both Agile and CMMI) have just shipped on 29 March 2006 –Download guidance from MSF v4 for Infrastructure Deployment and other “flavours” (Solutions, Consulting, etc.) are under development at present –This is news! Good news.

14 TEŽAVNOST: Agility Agility of the development process is the key to being able to cope with inevitable changes (spec, environment, business) or planning errors The price of it is a certain unpredictability of the process –Finish date, final cost, feature set… Generally, agility is great for small and medium projects in existing and tested dev environments

15 TEŽAVNOST: CMMI Capability-Maturity Model Integration describes 5 (or 6) levels of process-based predictability of an organisation (or department) in terms of their ability to produce quality software Level 5 is best. Most companies are 0 or 1. MSF v4 can help you work at level 3 or more. Moving towards higher levels is done by adopting highly predictable (but not so agile) processes Great for larger or more formal projects, especially in more critical environments By the way, MSF and CMMI are not strangers: KPMG published a paper on how MSF v1 could help you with CMM already in 1995!

16 TEŽAVNOST: Observation MSF v3 seems more “formal” than MSF for Agile Software Development –We lose some of the structure and modelling from v3 and replace them with a more integrated agile process MSF v3 seems less “formal” than MSF for CMMI Process Improvement –Structures from v3 are becoming more process-improvement oriented

17 TEŽAVNOST: What About Extreme Programming? Extreme Programming (XP), which was created after MSF, has similarities –Similarities regarding the Zero Defect Mindset and Daily Builds XP is less predictable than necessary for more formal projects –But great for very agile projects MSF for Agile Software Development seems more predictable, controllable and even more agile than XP MSF CMMI Process Improvement, naturally, is less agile than XP, but seems the most predictable

18 TEŽAVNOST: Key Components of MSF

19 TEŽAVNOST: A Team of Peers (v4 Agile)

20 TEŽAVNOST: Scaling the Team Model Feature & Function Teams Technique Example:

21 TEŽAVNOST: Designing Software within MSF UML (Unified Modelling Language) has a great tradition, though we may need to evolve towards a service-oriented approach –UML2? Perhaps, but it’s possible to be more direct in design. Domain Specific Languages! –Great conceptual integration both with MSF and with the tools (VSTS) –Further, possible, integration with SDM and DSI

22 TEŽAVNOST: Project Management in v4 One of the most powerful features of Visual Studio Team System is its automation of project management –Workstreams, Work Items, and Roles concepts –Uses Team Foundation Server –Relies on Microsoft Project-style planning documents

23 TEŽAVNOST: MSF Process Model v3 Project Plans Approved Scope Complete Release Readiness Approved Deployment Complete Vision/Scope Approved MSF

24 TEŽAVNOST: Envision Plan Build Stabilize Deploy Release 1

25 TEŽAVNOST: Process Modelling in v4 MSF v4 introduces a new model of Governance and Enactment which replace the traditional process model This caters for different types of processes, which are now defined at the level of methodology, rather than the framework This makes MSF v4 much more suited to work in teams both very small and very big, as opposed to what v3 could have ever catered for

26 TEŽAVNOST: 20026

27 27 Iterations Achievement of a pre-determined level of quality Based on planning of feature-sets Mechanism to correct project plan deviations

28 TEŽAVNOST: Governance Process mapped onto specific iterations

29 TEŽAVNOST: Cycles The foundation of every day’s co- ordinated work of the team

30 TEŽAVNOST: Daily (Nightly) Build Building the product in a deployable form on a daily basis A daily build is –A strong indicator that a team is functional –Guarantee against component integration problems –A way to make the product and its progress visible –The heartbeat of the development process A key function of VSTF (see later)

31 TEŽAVNOST: How Does Daily Build Work? A –A → A’ –B–B –C–C B –A–A –B → B’ –C–C C –A–A –B–B –C → C’ A –A’ –B–B –C’ B –A’ –B, B’ –C’ C –A’ –B–B –C’ A’’ –From A’ B’’ –From B and B’ C’’ –From C’ → Day 1Day 2Day 3BVT →→→→

32 TEŽAVNOST: Quality Criteria Knowing When You Can Ship MSF v4 defines: –Minimum Acceptance Level (Scenarios) Relates to “Core Functionality Set” –Test Thresholds Code Coverage for Unit Tests Other, context-driven (bugs per developer) VSTS manages tracking and reporting of these quality criteria during all phases of the project

33 TEŽAVNOST: Work Items Activities and Workstreams manage the concept of a work item, which describes an assignable, individual piece of effort that needs to be done: –Bug –Quality of Service Requirement –Scenario –Risk (not yet in the beta of VSTS, but soon) –Task

34 TEŽAVNOST: Process Model

35 TEŽAVNOST: Team System Ingenious: tool that implements MSF! –As soon as you create a new project in VSTS you get to chose which version of MSF v4 you want to use! VS 2005 TS manages the flow of work items between team members, as well as overlooks their progress Individual versions for –Developer –Architect –Tester Reporting and management tools for project manager and other team members –Includes Outlook, Excel and Project Support

36 TEŽAVNOST: Future

37 TEŽAVNOST: MSF and Software Development Without a doubt, the emphasis of MSF v4 is on software development –The MSF team is now firmly a part of the Visual Studio group within Microsoft Tying the framework to the tools (VSTS) was the masterstroke that gave MSF a very prosperous future –And vice-versa: the method adds value to the tools, beyond what any Microsoft competitor could offer today

38 TEŽAVNOST: MSF for Infrastructure Deployment While initially there was a little confusion, it has now been confirmed that MSF v4 will cater for Infrastructure Deployment too While the detail is being finalised, please consider using MSF v3 or MOF for purely infrastructure deployment oriented projects –Consider using the more flexible process approaches from v3 –Soft skills, whichever version, like all good ideas, age only like wine, anyway

39 TEŽAVNOST: Summary Projects fail for non-technical reasons A framework such as MSF fixes those problem You don’t have to use all of MSF at once If you use some bits you increase your chance of succeeding Visual Studio Team System is a marvellous implementation of MSF principles

40 TEŽAVNOST: Resources MSF for Agile Software Development: –lab.msdn.microsoft.com/teamsystem/workshop/msfagile/defau lt.aspxlab.msdn.microsoft.com/teamsystem/workshop/msfagile/defau lt.aspx MSF for CMMI Process Improvement: –lab.msdn.microsoft.com/teamsystem/workshop/msfcmmi/defa ult.aspxlab.msdn.microsoft.com/teamsystem/workshop/msfcmmi/defa ult.aspx MSF v3: –msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/enterprise/msf/msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/enterprise/msf/ MSF Forum: –forums.microsoft.com/msdn/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=63forums.microsoft.com/msdn/ShowForum.aspx?ForumID=63 MOF: –www.microsoft.com/mofwww.microsoft.com/mof


Download ppt "TEŽAVNOST: 200 Microsoft Solutions Framework – MSF v4 Rafal Lukawiecki Strategic Consultant Project Botticelli Ltd This presentation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google