Presentation on theme: "Unit 5: What Do Parties Want?"— Presentation transcript:
1Unit 5: What Do Parties Want? Reading:Mueller and Strom pgs. 1-27
2Guiding Questions What is party government? What do parties want? What are vote seeking goals? Office seeking? Policy seeking?Can parties maximize all three goals?
3Political Parties and Government Political science suggests that political parties a central role in promoting and maintaining democracy.Schattschneider 1942“modern democracy is unthinkable save in terms of political parties”Muller and Strom 1999In a democracy, voters delegate policy-making authority to representatives via political parties.
4What Is Party Government? We can conceive of democracy as “party government”Katz 1986; Katz 19871) Parties organize policy-makingGovernment decisions made by party leaders.Government policy decided within political parties.Parties act cohesively to enact policy.2) Parties serve as intermediaries between voters and government.Elections seen as mechanisms to ensure party accountability.3) Parties recruit political leadership.Most elected officials are affiliated with a party.
5What Do Parties Seek? Mueller and Strom 1999 Three strategies are typically offered.Parties as:1) Office-seekers2) Policy-seekers3) Vote-seekers.These are ideal type strategies.Most parties seek more than one end.
6Factors Shaping Party Options Mueller and Strom 1999Party behavior is shaped by a variety of factors:1) Party leadership and organizationMotivations of the leadership (political entrepreneurs)Relationship between leadership and party activists2) Political institutional structuresElectoral/legislative lawsLaws governing coalition formation3) Political contextGeneral elections/economic circumstancesNumber of parties at the bargaining table
7Office Seeking Models Riker 1962 Parties seek to maximize their control over the benefits associated with taking office.Benefits include: cabinet portfolios, political appointments, etc.Parties share power only when necessary.Votes and policy viewed as instrumental to obtaining office (i.e. a means to an end), not as intrinsically valuable.
8Policy Seeking Models De Swaan 1973 Parties seek to maximize their impact on policy.Political parties have policy platforms that they seek to enact once in office.When parties coalesce, they will do so with parties that have similar policy outlooks.Policy can be considered as intrinsically valuable or as instrumental to other goals (e.g. office).
9Vote Seeking Models Downs 1957 Parties seek to maximize their vote share.Parties use policy manifestoes to win votes, not for policy ends per se.Parties maximize votes even when they are assured of a majority.Votes are instrumental and not intrinsically valuable in and of themselves.
10Election 2005: Merkel’s Dilemma Majority = 308No party could govern alone.Schroeder and Merkel both made claims on the chancellorship.Merkel was given first crack at forming a coalition.Her party held the most seats.
11Election 2005: Merkel’s Dilemma Merkel’s preferred policy coalition (yellow-black):FDP/CDU/CSU = 287 seats21 short.Schroeder’s preferred policy coalition (red-green):SPD/B90GR = 27335 short.PDS/Left was not an option.Both sides needed to woo another party.Attention turned to the B90Gr and FDP.
12Election 2005: Merkel’s Dilemma From an office seeking standpoint, adding B90/Gr (i.e. a “Jamaica coalition”) would give Merkel 338 seats.Rejected by the Green party on policy grounds.Adding the FDP to the SPD/B90/Gr (i.e. traffic light coalition) would give Schroeder 334 seats.But this was rejected by the FDP on policy grounds.
13Election 2005: Merkel’s Dilemma Polls showed Germans did not want another election.Merkel agrees to form a grand coalition with the SPD.Coalition was strained by:1) conservative social policy advocated by the CSU2) center left economic policy favored by the SPD3) desire for economic reform by members of the CDU.SPD entered 2009 elections pushing for a return of the grand coalition.CDU wanted to end it.
14Election 2009: The Aftermath Left G/B SPD FDP CDU CSU-45CDU vote declined slightlyBeing in government can sometimes come at an electoral cost.Voters punished the SPDWorst performance in the postwar eraVoters rewarded the FDP, the Greens, and the LeftAll opposition parties fared well.Government formed by the CDU/CSU and the FDP.Merkel was seeking a yellow-black coalition rather than another grand coalition
15Conclusions: Party Goals Goals are not mutually exclusive.Parties may attempt to maximize one (e.g. votes) to obtain another (e.g. policy or office).But parties must also make tradeoffs.Pursuing one type of goal can hinder the attainment of other goals.Office seeking strategies may risk a rebellion amongst party activists.Policy seeking strategies may please activists but harm a party’s ability to win votes within the larger electorate.Vote seeking strategies may impinge on a party’s policy- seeking goals if they water them down to appeal to the larger electorate.
16Next Unit Theme: Parties and Votes Game: Elections Reading: Ware CH 11 Mueller and Strom pgsGame: Elections