Download presentation

Published byJustice Bodey Modified over 3 years ago

1
**Section 4-2 Radical Ideals and the Ideal-Variety Correspondence by Pablo Spivakovsky-Gonzalez**

2
**Let V be a variety. If fm 2 I(V), then f 2 I(V).**

-We ended Section 4-1 with Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz -In this section we will look at Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz from a different perspective -If we have some variety V, can we identify those ideals that consist of all polynomials which vanish on that variety? Lemma 1: Let V be a variety. If fm 2 I(V), then f 2 I(V).

3
Proof: Let x 2 V. If fm 2 I(V), then (f(x))m = 0. This can only be true if f(x) = 0. This reasoning applies to any x 2 V, so we conclude that f 2 I(V). -Therefore, I(V) has the property that if some power of a polynomial is in the ideal, then that polynomial itself must also belong to I(V). -This leads to the definition of radical ideal.

4
**{f : fm 2 I for some integer m ¸ 1 }.**

Definition 2: An ideal I is radical if fm 2 I for some integer m ¸ implies that f 2 I. -We can now rephrase Lemma 1 using radical ideals. Corollary 3: I(V) is a radical ideal. Definition 4: Let I ½ k[x1,…,xn] be an ideal. The radical of I, denoted , is the set {f : fm 2 I for some integer m ¸ 1 }.

5
**1. I ½ , since f 2 I means f1 2 I and therefore f 2 by definition.**

Properties of : 1. I ½ , since f 2 I means f1 2 I and therefore f by definition. An ideal I is radical if and only if I = For any ideal I, is always an ideal. Example: Consider the ideal J = h x2, y3 i½ k[x, y]. Neither x nor y lie in J; but x and y

6
**by the Binomial Theorem.**

Also, (x ¢ y)2 = x2y2 2 J, because x2 2 J. Then x ¢ y Finally, x + y To see this, we note that (x + y)4 = x4 + 4x3y + 6x2y2 + 4xy3 + y4 , by the Binomial Theorem. Since each term above is a multiple of either x2 or y3, (x + y)4 2 J, and therefore x + y

7
**Now consider the binomial expansion of (f + g)m+l-1 .**

Lemma 5: If I is an ideal in k[x1,…,xn] then is an ideal in k[x1,…,xn] containing I. Furthermore, is a radical ideal. Proof: I ½ has already been shown. We want to prove is an ideal. Let f, g ; then by definition there exist m, l 2 Z+ so that fm, gl 2 I. Now consider the binomial expansion of (f + g)m+l-1 .

8
**Finally, suppose f 2 and h 2 k[x1,…,xn].**

Every term in the expansion has a factor figj with i + j = m + l – 1. Therefore, either i ¸ m or j ¸ l, so either fi 2 I or gj 2 I. This implies that figj 2 I, so every term of the expansion lies in I. Therefore, (f + g)m+l-1 2 I, so f + g Finally, suppose f and h 2 k[x1,…,xn]. This means that fm 2 I for some integer m ¸ l.

9
**Theorem 6 (The Strong Nullstellensatz): **

Therefore, hmfm 2 I, or (h¢f)m 2 I, so hf This completes the proof that is an ideal. The book leaves the proof that is a radical ideal as an exercise at the end of the section. Theorem 6 (The Strong Nullstellensatz): Let k be an algebraically closed field. If I is an ideal in k[x1,…,xn], then I(V(I)) =

10
**This means that f 2 . And because f was arbitrary,**

Proof: Consider any f Then by definition fm 2 I for some m ¸ l. Therefore fm vanishes on V(I), so clearly f must vanish on V(I) also. It follows that f 2 I(V(I)) , so we have ½ I(V(I)) . Conversely, suppose that f 2 I(V(I)). Then f vanishes on V(I). Now, by Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz, 9 m ¸ l such that fm 2 I. This means that f And because f was arbitrary,

11
I(V(I)) ½ Before we had ½ I(V(I)), so clearly I(V(I)) = This concludes our proof. - Note: From now on, Theorem 6 will be referred to simply as “the Nullstellensatz”. - The Nullstellensatz allows us to set up a “dictionary” between algebra and geometry => very important!

12
**Theorem 7 (The Ideal-Variety Correspondence): **

Let k be an arbitrary field. 1. The maps I affine varieties ===> ideals V ideals ===> affine varieties are inclusion-reversing. If I1 ½ I2 are ideals, then V(I1) ¾ V(I2) and, similarly, if V1 ½ V2 are varieties, then I(V1) ¾ I(V2).

13
**In addition, for any variety V, we have V(I(V)) = V,**

so that I is always one-to-one. 2. If k is algebraically closed, and we restrict ourselves to radical ideals, then the maps I affine varieties ===> radical ideals V radical ideals ===> affine varieties are inclusion-reversing bijections which are inverses of each other.

14
**By definition, every f 2 I(V) vanishes on V, so**

Proof: 1. The proof that I and V are inclusion reversing is given as an exercise at the end of the section. We will now prove that V(I(V)) = V, when V = V(f1,…,fs) is a subvariety of kn. By definition, every f 2 I(V) vanishes on V, so V ½ V(I(V)).

15
**definition of I. Therefore, h f1,…,fs i ½ I(V).**

On the other hand, we have f1,…,fs 2 I(V) from definition of I. Therefore, h f1,…,fs i ½ I(V). V is inclusion reversing, hence V(I(V)) ½ V(h f1,…,fs i) = V. Before we had V ½ V(I(V)), and now we showed V(I(V)) ½ V.

16
**We also know that V(I(V)) = V from Part 1.**

Therefore V(I(V)) = V, and I is one-to-one because it has a left inverse. This completes the proof of Part 1 of Thm. 7. 2. By Corollary 3, I(V) is a radical ideal. We also know that V(I(V)) = V from Part 1. The next step is to prove I(V(I)) = I whenever I is a radical ideal.

17
**The Nullstellensatz tells us I(V(I)) = .**

Also, if I is radical, I = (Exercise 4). Therefore, I(V(I)) = I whenever I is a radical ideal. We see that V and I are inverses of each other. V and I define bijections between the set of radical ideals and affine varieties. This completes the proof.

18
**Consequences of Theorem 7:**

- Allows us to consider a question about varieties (geometry) as an algebraic question about radical ideals, and viceversa. - We can move between algebra and geometry => powerful tool for solving many problems! - Note that the field we are working over must be algebraically closed in order to apply Theorem 7.

19
**Questions about Radical Ideals:**

Consider an ideal I = h f1,…,fs i : 1. Radical Generators: Is there an algorithm to produce a set {g1,…,gm} so that = h g1,…,gm i ? 2. Radical Ideal: Is there an algorithm to determine if I is radical? 3. Radical Membership: Given f 2 k[x1,…,xn], is there an algorithm to determine if f ?

20
**Proposition 8 (Radical Membership):**

Answer: -Yes, algorithms exist for all 3 problems. -We will focus on the easiest question, #3, the Radical Membership Problem. Proposition 8 (Radical Membership): Let k be an arbitrary field and let I = h f1,…,fs i ½ k[x1,…,xn] be an ideal. Then f 2 if and only if the constant polynomial 1 belongs to the ideal = h f1,…,fs, 1 – yf i ½ k[x1,…,xn,y].

21
**Suppose 1 2 . Then we can write 1 as: s **

In other words, f 2 if and only if = k[x1,…,xn,y]. Proof: Suppose Then we can write 1 as: s 1 = pi (x1,…,xn, y) fi + q(x1,…,xn, y)(1 – yf), i=1 for some pi , q 2 k[x1,…,xn, y].

22
**Now we multiply both sides by fm : fm = Ai fi , **

We set y = 1 / f(x1,…,xn). Then our expression becomes s 1 = pi (x1,…,xn, 1/f ) fi , i=1 Now we multiply both sides by fm : fm = Ai fi , for some polynomials Ai 2 k[x1,…,xn].

23
**= ymfm + (1 – yf)(1 + yf +…+ ym-1fm-1 ) 2**

Therefore, fm 2 I, and so f Going the other way, suppose that f Then fm 2 I ½ for some m. At the same time, 1 – yf Then, 1 = ymfm + (1 – ymfm ) = = ymfm + (1 – yf)(1 + yf +…+ ym-1fm-1 ) 2

24
**so the proof is complete.**

Hence, f implies that And before we had that implies f 2 so the proof is complete. Radical Membership Algorithm: -To determine if f ½ k[x1,…,xn] we first compute a reduced Groebner basis for:

25
**h f1,…,fs, 1 – yf i ½ k[x1,…,xn,y]. -If the result is {1}, then f 2 .**

-Example: Consider the ideal I = h xy2 + 2y2, x4 – 2x2 + 1 i in k[x, y]. We want to determine if f = y – x lies in Using lex order on k[x, y, z], we compute a reduced Groebner basis of the following ideal:

26
**The basis we obtain is {1}, so by Proposition 8 f 2 .**

= h xy2 + 2y2, x4 – 2x2 + 1, 1 – z (y – x2 + 1) i The basis we obtain is {1}, so by Proposition 8 f - In fact, (y – x2 + 1)3 2 I, but no lower power of f is in I. Principal Ideals: -If I = h f i, we can compute the radical of I as follows:

27
**Proposition 9: Definition 10:**

Let f 2 k[x1,…,xn] and I = h f i. If is the factorization of f into a product of distinct irreducible polynomials, then = h f1f2 ··· fr i Definition 10: If f 2 k[x1,…,xn] is a polynomial, we define the reduction of f, denoted fred , to be the polynomial such that h fred i = , where I = h f i.

28
**-A polynomial is said to be reduced, or square-free, if**

f = fred . -Section 4-2 ends with a formula for computing the radical of a principal ideal => see pg. 181.

29
**Stay tuned for the next lecture,**

Sources Used - Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms, by Cox, Little, O’Shea; UTM Springer, 3rd Ed., 2007. Thank You! Stay tuned for the next lecture, by ShinnYih Huang!

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Chapter 3 Direct Proof and Proof by Contrapositive

Chapter 3 Direct Proof and Proof by Contrapositive

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google