We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCamron Gold
Modified about 1 year ago
1 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 Béatrice Fervers email@example.com Madrid 30 novembre 2006 Guideline adaptation: the way forward?
2 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Challenges for guideline developers Produce high quality guidelines in a timely manner Keep guidelines up-to-date Work with increasingly limited resources Foster ownership and acceptance of guidelines Improve effective use of guidelines
3 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Guideline adaptation: the way forward? Many guidelines on the same topic Convergence of key methods for guideline development But Guidelines on the same topic vary in coverage and scope Inconsistency of recommendations with cited evidence Lack of transparency in the formulation of recommendations Legitimate variations of guideline recommendations based on the same evidence
4 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Organisational context Evidence and evidence judgments Cultural context and value judgments Translation of evidence into guideline recommendations
5 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Legitimate variations of guideline recommendations Initial treatment of women with early stage breast cancer. Clinical recommendations in France and Ontario Fervers B et al. 1997 Cultural basis for differences between US and French clinical recommendations for women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer Eisinger F et al. 1999 Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer at the turn of the century: European and US perspectives Wils J et al 2001 Ethnic specific recommendations in CPG Manna DR et al. 2003 Culturally appropriate guidelines for alcohol and drug abuse prevention Shoultz et al 2000
6 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Guideline adaptation Definition Modification of guideline(s) produced in one cultural and organizational setting to be used in a different cultural organizational context Alternative to de novo guideline development Take advantage of existing guidelines to reduce duplication of effort
7 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Different forms of guideline adaptation 'Broad to narrow' adaptation From national level to local or regional context Implementation: tailoring of a national guideline to local context 'Transcontextual' adaptation Distinct cultural and organisational setting Alternative to de novo guideline development Implementation of an international guideline Here There Narrow Broad
8 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Guideline adaptation: practical questions How to identify relevant guidelines? How to assess guideline quality? How to assess fidelity? How to assess applicability ? How to adapt the recommendations? How to ensure acceptance and ownership of adapted guideline?
9 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org ADAPTE Aims Promote the efficient production and use of clinical practice guidelines through the adaptation of existing guidelines Develop a systematic approach to aid in the adaptation of guidelines MANUAL FOR GUIDELINE ADAPTATION Version 1.0 Prepared by the ADAPTE GROUP 2006
10 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org The ADAPTE group International collaboration of researchers and guideline developers Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh MC, Latreille J, Mlika-Cabanne N, Paquet L, Coulombe M, Poirier M, Burnand B. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 2006:18(3):167-176 Graham, I. D., Harrison, M. B., & Brouwers, M. (2003). Evaluating and adapting practice guidelines for local use: a conceptual framework. In S.Pickering & J. Thompson (Eds.), Clinical Governance in Practice (pp. 213-229). London: Harcourt
11 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org ADAPTE - a systematic approach to guideline adaptation Why develop a systematic approach ? Help ensure the quality and validity of the adapted guideline Enhance relevance of adapted guideline to the context of use Encourage confidence in and acceptance of the guidelines by targeted users
12 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org ADAPTE process Target audience Guideline developers, health care professionals and decision makers Groups from local to international level Manual takes into account level of experience with guideline development and available resources Applications Groups interested in selecting 1 cpg and adapting it to the local context Groups wishing to identify all high quality guidelines and customize one that meets their needs Manual designed to be flexible Scope CPGs of any disease area Screening, diagnosis, treatment, supportive care, health promotion
13 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Principles guiding ADAPTE Respect of evidence-based principles for guideline development Reliable methods to ensure quality and validity of adapted guidelines Participative approach involving all key stakeholders to foster acceptance and ownership Explicit consideration of context to ensure relevance for practice Transparent reporting to favor confidence Flexible format to accommodate specific needs and circumstances
14 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org 3 Phases and Various Modules of Process Set-Up Phase Adaptation PhaseFinalization Phase Preparation Module Scope and Purpose Module Search and Screen Module Assessment Module Decision and Selection Module Customization Module External Review, Consultation and Accountability Module Final Production Module Scheduled Review and Update Module
15 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org 3 Phases and Various Modules of Process Set-Up Phase Adaptation PhaseFinalization Phase Preparation Module Scope and Purpose Module Search and Screen Module Assessment Module Decision and Selection Module Customization Module External Review, Consultation and Accountability Module Final Production Module Scheduled Review and Update Module
16 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Adaptation phase Assists users in moving from selection of a topic to identification of specific clinical questions searching for and retrieving guidelines assessing the consistency of the evidence therein, their quality, currency, content and applicability decision making around adaptation and preparing the draft adapted guideline
17 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Adaptation Phase Scope and Purpose Module P atient population and disease characteristics I ntervention (s) of interest P rofessionals targeted by the guideline O utcomes and endpoints to be taken into consideration H ealthcare setting and context PIPOH
18 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Adaptation Phase Search and Screen Module Searching for guidelines Guideline clearinghouses (e.g. www.g-i-n.net, ww.guideline.gov) Guideline developing organisations' websites Bibliographic databases (eg MEDLINE, Embase) Internet Screen retrieved guidelines Relevance to defined key questions Publication date Modify clinical questions, expand search Reduce a large number of retrieved guidelines Rigor dimension of the AGREE instrument
19 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Adaptation Phase Assessment Module Aims/ TasksProducts/ Deliverables Skills/ Organizational Requirements Helpful Tools Assess the consistency, quality, currency, content and applicability of source guidelines AGREE scores Search and selection evaluation Consistency of evidence and interpretations Consistency of interpretations and recommendations Summary of currency Recommendations Matrices Evaluation of applicability Methodological expertise Information retrieval skills Clinical expertise Evaluation – Search and selection of evidence Evaluation – Scientific validity of guidelines with respect to clinical questions AGREE instrument AGREE inter-rater agreement and scored spreadsheets Sample currency survey Sample recommendations matrices Worksheet - Applicability
20 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Assessment Module - Quality Agree Instrument Framework for assessing the methods used for developing the guideline and the quality of the reporting 6 domains and 23 items Raw AGREE scores Dimensions graphs Overall assessment item ·strongly recommend· ·recommend with alterations· ·would not recommend· ·unsure· Discussion of differences with the panel Educational process Confidence
21 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Assessment Module – Consistency Evaluation of search strategy and selection of evidence Comprehensive search for evidence? No biases in the selection of articles? Consistency between evidence and interpretations, interpretations and recommendations Overall the evidence is valid? Recommendations based on data / interpretations?
22 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Assessment Module - Currency Rapidly evolving evidence [Shekelle et al 2001] Guidelines may be outdated in as little as 3 years Assement of currency When was the guideline last updated? Any plans to update the guideline in near future? Any new evidence to invalidate any of the recommendations? Any new evidence relevant to guideline?
23 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Assessment Module – Applicability / Acceptability To ensure that the adapted guideline will be relevant for the context of use and that it is suited to the needs, priorities, legislation, policies and resources in the targeted setting Can the recommendation be put into practice? Applicability to targeted patients Characteristics Organizational barriers (health care system and local) Availability of interventions Availability of necessary expertise Economic/resource barriers Value judgements and cultural differences Is the benefit from this recommendation worth implementing? Strength of supporting evidence Value judgements
24 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Adaptation Phase Decision and Selection Module Results of the assessment module provide an explicit basis for informed and transparent decision making around the selection and modifications of source guidelines Review assessments to aid in decision making Panel discussion Select between guidelines and recommendations to create an adapted guideline
25 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Decision and Selection Module Results of the assessment module Explicit basis for informed and transparent decision making Options ACCEPT a guideline as a whole and all of its recommendations May include translation and adaptation of format Production of a customized guideline from one or more source guidelines involving ACCEPT single recommendations ADAPT - Modify single recommendations ACCEPT evidence summary of guideline UPDATE of evidence
26 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Customization Module Important sections of adapted guideline: Transparency of all decision making (e.g., consensus process described, how decisions were arrived at/resolved, if recommendations were modified – how and why they were modified) Acknowledgement of source guideline developers and where necessary, permission granted by source developers
27 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org 3 Phases and Various Modules of Process Set-Up Phase Adaptation PhaseFinalization Phase Preparation Module Scope and Purpose Module Search and Screen Module Assessment Module Decision and Selection Module Customization Module External Review, Consultation and Accountability Module Final Production Module Scheduled Review and Update Module
28 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org ADAPTE – next steps Dissemination of ADAPTE Manual Evaluation of ADAPTE process and tools ‘Does ADAPTE aid in the development of high quality, unbiased guidelines, produced efficiently and likely to be used in practice?’ International study Assessment of use, acceptability, relevance and benefits to different user groups
29 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Guideline adaptation: the way forward? Potential benefits Potentially less time and fewer resources required than for de novo development SOR : 10 months with ADAPTE vs 16-18 month Efficient use and rigorous review of existing guidelines Reduce duplication of effort, especially for the systematic review portion of guideline Improved quality and consistency of the guidelines produced? Promotes explicitness and transparency of guideline recommendations Educative process Respects evidence-based principles of guideline development Explicit consideration of the context of use Favors confidence, acceptance and ownership Advantage for countries and organisations with small budgets and limited experience
30 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Guideline adaptation: the way forward? Potential barriers Heterogeneous quality of existing guidelines Currency of source guidelines Transparency of reporting in guidelines Reluctance of panel members Before - After Transparent explanation of the process is important ! Reluctance to use adapted guidelines
31 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Guideline adaptation: First step to shared development and updating?
32 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org CoCanCPG - What aspects can be shared at a multi-national level ? Topic selection Constitution of multidisciplinary working group Publication Dissemination Literature monitoring to identify needed updates Literature search External review Critical appraisal / systematic review Formulation of the recommendations Multinational collaboration to avoid duplication of effort Step 0 Step 1 Step 2 Step 4 Step 3 Step 5 Step 6 Step 8 Step 7
33 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org CoCanCPG : Co-ordination of Cancer guideline programs Coordination Action under the ERA-Net scheme Overcome existing fragmentation and duplication between cancer guidelines programs Support the coherent development of policies at regional, national and European level to improve equitable access to high quality cancer care Establish sustainable cooperation at the program management level for guideline development and research Set up a framework for sharing of information, methods and skills Benchmark guideline development methods Identify and implement activities that can be shared at the trans-national level
34 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org CoCanCPG www.cocancpg.eu 16 Partners from 11 countries P7 – Netherlands: ACCC P10 – UK: SIGN P12 – Italy: ASR E-R P11 – UK: NICE P9 – Spain: AATRM P13 – France: FNCLCC P14 – Lithuania: Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University P15 – Germany: IQWiG P16 – Quebec: DLCC P5 – Israel: CSMOH P4 – Hungary: EUMIN P2 – Belgium: KCE P6 – Lithuania: DSPP P3 – France: HAS P1 – Coordinator: INCa P8 – Spain: AETSA
35 Madrid - 30/11/2006 - B. Fervers. Copyright © 2006 www.adapte.org Globalise the evidence Localise the decision John Eisenberg Adaptation and shared development to overcome duplication Taking into account the local context is necessary to bridge the gap Translation from basic sciences to human sciences Clinical Research Continuum Sung et al, JAMA 2003;289:1278-86 Basic biomedical research Clinical research Translation of new knowledge into clinical practice and health decision making Improved health
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.
Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Using the AGREE¹ Instrument CAN-IMPLEMENT Toolkit Version 1.0 April 2010 Modified from:
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Adapting Guidelines for Local Implementation: Fusion Cuisine or Fast Food Leftovers Eddy Lang MDCM CCFP(EM) Head Department of Emergency Medicine Senior.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
Module N° 4ICAO State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation Course 1 Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework Revision N° 5ICAO State Safety Programme (SSP) Implementation.
Clinical Practice Guidelines By Dr. Hanan Said Ali.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY KORNBERG SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY 1 Evidence-based Dental Practice Developing guidelines or clinical recommendations.
5-1-1 Unit 1: Introduction to the course and to behavioural surveillance.
PSSA Preparation. Question 1(no calculator) D Question 2 (no calculator)
1 Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building International Evaluation & Methodology Conference 6-7 May 2010 Budapest Anna Galazka European.
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines Manit Srisurapanont, MD Department of Psychiatry Chiang Mai University For Evidence-Based Medicine Workshop,
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
Summative Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
NORMAPME ISO User Guide for European SMEs The essence of. Guido Gürtler
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
Using Guidelines: The Need for Adaptation Ian D Graham, PhD, FCAHS December 10, 2012 E-GAPPS.
1 Project Cycle Management and Statistics Module 5.
DRAFT 1 Developing and Implementing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process 1.
Chapter 12 Analyzing Semistructured Decision Support Systems Systems Analysis and Design Kendall and Kendall Fifth Edition.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Member.
Promoting Regulatory Excellence Self Assessment & Physiotherapy: the Ontario Model Jan Robinson, Registrar & CEO, College of Physiotherapists of Ontario.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Assessing Health Needs Gilbert Burnham, MD, PhD Johns Hopkins University.
Improving individual performance: Effective Performance Management Systems for Small States Regional Caribbean Conference on Improving Public Service Performance.
HTA Benefits and Risks Dr Bernard Merkel European Commission.
1. 2 Considering the Establishment Survey Response Process in the Context of the Administrative Sciences Diane K. Willimack U.S. Census Bureau.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
CARMEN Policy Observatory and Dialogue Proposal Presentation to the CARMEN Directing Board Meeting San Juan, Puerto Rico 30 June 2003.
1 International guidelines: Similarities and Criticisms Dr. Antony Stella, Audit Director Australian Universities Quality Agency & APQN Board Member.
Create an Application Title 1A - Adult Chapter 3.
BS-ERA.NET project- state of the art Dr. Şerban PANAITESCU Project Coordinator International Learning Network (ILN) meeting on the implementation of International.
14% of the exam 24 questions 1 Carol Pattyn 6/18/13.
Service delivery and health care improvement in Georgia Thoughts from a recent case study Dr. Francoise Cluzeau Senior Adviser NICE International.
1 Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6. 2 Summary This session will introduce dimensions of project appraisal, including: issues of social acceptability/desirability,
Safety and health at work is everyone’s concern. It’s good for you. It’s good for business. Online interactive Risk Assessment Advisory Committee for Safety.
World Trade Organization (WTO) Workshop on Risk Analysis and the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Geneva, Switzerland, June.
Universität Kaiserslautern Institut für Technologie und Arbeit / Institute of Technology and Work 1 Q16) Willingness to participate in a follow-up case.
Framework for Operations and Implementation Research in Health.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
February 2009 Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D., MPH Office of Program Analysis.
1 California Preschool Learning Foundations. 2 Outcomes Increase your understanding of the California Preschool Learning Foundations, including: why they.
T H O M S O N S C I E N T I F I C Ann Wescott April 8, 2008 Prous Science Update SLA DPHT Spring Meeting 2008.
STRUMENTI DI SVILUPPO LOCALE E DELLIMPRENDITORIALITA SOCIAL INCLUSION IN THE TIME OF CRISIS Dr Emma Clarence OECD LEED Trento Centre.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.