Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byClifton Hobson Modified over 4 years ago

1
Inapproximability of MAX-CUT Khot,Kindler,Mossel and O ’ Donnell Moshe Ben Nehemia June 05

2
Main Result It is NP-Hard problem to approximate MAX-CUT to within a factor is the approximation ratio achieved by the algorithm of Goemans & Williamson. The result follows from: 1. Unique Games conjecture 2. Majority is Stablest Theorem

3
Hardness of Approximation History: Bellare & Goldreich & Sudan :It is NP Hard to approximate MAX-CUT within factor higher than 83/84 Hasted improved the result to 16/17 Today: closing the gap …

4
Introduction MAX-CUT: Given a Graph G =(V,E), find a partition C=(V 1, V 2 ) that maximize: Unique Label Cover: Given a bi-partite graph with left side vertices- V,right side W, and edges- E each edge have a constraint bijection The goal: assign each vertex a label which satisfy the constraint.

5
Unique Games Conjecture: For any there exist a constant Such that it is NP-hard to distinguish whether the Unique Label Cover problem with label set in size M has optimum at least or at most

6
Some defintions Let be an arbitrary boolean function The influence of x i on f Let x be a uniformly random string in :E[X]=0 and form y by flipping each bit with prob The noise stability of f for a noise rate is:

7
The Correlation between x,y is define to be: E[XY] = 2 Pr[X=Y]-1 Let x be a uniformly random string in y be -correlated copy :i.e. pick each bit independently s.t. The noise correlation of f with parameter is:

8
Result[60 ’ ] :

9
Fix then for any there is a small enough s.t. if is any function satisfying : Then: The Majority is Stablest Theorem

10
On the Geometry of MAX-CUT The Goemans-Williamson algorithm: Embedding the graph in the unit sphere of R n : The embedding is selected s.t. this sum is maximize A cut in G is obtained by choosing a random hyperplane through the origin. And this sum bounds from above the size of the maximal cut

11
On the Geometry of MAX-CUT The probability that vertics u,v lie on opposite sides of the cut is: So the expected weight is

12
On the Geometry of MAX-CUT So to get: Set the approximation ratio to:

13
Reminder The Long Code: The codeword encoding the message is by the truth table of the “ dictator ” function:

14
Technical Background The Bonami Beckner operator Proposition: Let and then:

15
Technical Background Proposition: Let then for every Proof: Define: And : And using the Parseval identity we get the proposition

16
Technical Background Let and let The k-degree influence of coordinate i on f is defined by: Proposition: The “ Majority is Stablest ” Theorem remains true if we change the assumption to

17
Reverse version of the “Majority is Stablest” Fix then for any there is a small enough s.t. if is any function satisfying : Then:

18
Reverse version of the “Majority is Stablest” Proof: Take such f, and define: Now g holds: And now apply the original Theorem

19
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Notations: denote the string and xy the coordinatewise product of x and y Lemma 1: Completeness If ULC have OPT then MAX-CUT have cut Lemma 2: Soundness If ULC have OPT then MAX-CUT have cut at most

20
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Unique Label Cover WV v W’W’ w MAX-CUT j J’J’ i {-1,1} M

21
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT The Reduction: Pick a vertex at random and 2 of its neighbors: Let and be the constrains for those edges Let f,g be the supposed Long Codes of the labels Pick at random Pick by choosing each coordinate independently to be 1 with probability and -1 with prob. Edge in Cut iff

22
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Completeness Assume that the LC instance has a labeling which satisfies fraction of the edges. now encode these labels via Long Code with prob both the edges are satisfied by the labeling Denote the label of v,w,w ’ by i,j,j ’

23
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Completeness note that: Now f,g are the Long Codes of j,j ’, so: The two bits are unequal iff and that happens with prob. hence the completeness :

24
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Soundness – The Proof Strategy if the max-cut bigger than we ’ ll be able to “ decode ” the “ Long Code “ and create a labeling which satisfy significant fraction of the edges in the LC problem, and get a contradiction by choosing small enough.

25
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT From the Fourier Transform:

26
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT The expectation over x vanishes unless and then s,s ’ have the same size. Because: We got: Because of for at least v in V ( “ good ” v) We have

27
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Define Now:

28
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Now,from the “ Majority is stablest ” theorem: We conclude that h has at least one coordinate j s.t. label the vertex v with j And we have:

29
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT From the above equation we have that for at least fraction of neighbors w of v we have Define And so, Because we got that

30
Reduction from Unique LC to MAX-CUT Now,if we label each vertex w in W by random element from Cand[w], then among the “ good ” vertices v at least satisfied. or among the edges, and that yields the contradiction

31
Restriction to the cube For 2 vectors x,y on the cube,define the weight of (x,y) to be: Pr[X=x and Y=y] where X,Y are -correlated elements on the cube A cut C defines a boolean function on the cube f c. The size of C is exactly The expected size of the maximal cut is But, the “ dictator cut “ has size The “ Majority is stablest ” conjecture claim that these are the only cases.

32
The strategy of the proof correctness A legal code word (dictator func) has Pr[acc]= Soundness let be a func far from being a “ long code ” from the Majority is Stablest we get so the test pass with prob:

Similar presentations

OK

Approximation Algorithms Greedy Strategies. I hear, I forget. I learn, I remember. I do, I understand! 2 Max and Min min f is equivalent to max –f.

Approximation Algorithms Greedy Strategies. I hear, I forget. I learn, I remember. I do, I understand! 2 Max and Min min f is equivalent to max –f.

© 2019 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google