Download presentation

1
**Dilworth’s theorem and extremal set theory**

2
**If a subset of S is totally ordered, it is called a chain.**

A partial ordered set (poset) is a set S with a binary relation ≤ (or ⊆) such that (i) a ≤ a for all a ∈ S. (reflexivity) (ii) If a ≤ b and b ≤ c then a ≤ c. (transitivity) (iii) If a ≤ b and b ≤ a then a=b. (antisymmetry) If for any a and b in S, either a ≤ b or b ≤ a , then the partial order is called a total order. If a subset of S is totally ordered, it is called a chain.

3
**An antichain is a set of elements that are pairwise incomparable. **

E.g. ⊆: {1, 2, 3} {1, 2} {2, 3} {1, 3} {1} {2} {3}

4
**Dilworth Hartimanis Simon Tsai**

Thm 6.1. (Dilworth 1950) Let P be a partially ordered finite set. The minimum number m of disjoint chains which together contain all elements of P is equal to the maximum number M of elements in an antichain of P.

5
**Pf: (by H. Tverberg 1967) It is trivial m ≥ M.**

m: the minimum number of disjoint chains containing all elements of P. M: the maximum number of elements in an anti-chain of P. Pf: (by H. Tverberg 1967) It is trivial m ≥ M. Prove M ≥ m by induction on |P|. It is trivial if |P|=0. Let C be a maximal chain in P. If every antichain in P\C contains at most M-1 elements, done. Why? Assume {a1,…, aM} is an antichain in P\C. Define , . a1 …. aM-1 a1 …. aM a2

6
**Since C is maximal, the largest element in C is not in . **

aM a2 …. Since C is maximal, the largest element in C is not in . By ind. hypothesis, the theorem holds for . Thus, is the union of M disjoint chains , where Suppose and x > ai. Since there exists aj with x ≤ aj, we would have ai< x ≤ aj. →← Thus ai is the maximal element in , i=1,…,m. Similarly do the same for . Combine the chains and the theorem follows ▧

7
Another proof of Dilworth’s theorem: Suppose the largest anti-chain in the poset P has size r. Then P can be partitioned into r chains. Proof: (Fred Galvin 1994 American Math. Monthly) By induction on |P|. Let a be a maximal element of P, and n be the size of largest anti-chain in P’ = P\{a}. Then P’ is the union of n disjoint chains C1,...,Cn. Now every n-element anti-chain in P’ consists of one element from each Ci. Let ai be the maximal element in Ci which belongs to some n-element anti-chain in P’. Let A={a1,...,an}– an anti-chain?

8
Another proof of Dilworth’s theorem: Suppose the largest anti-chain in the poset P has size r. Then P can be partitioned into r chains. If A {a} is an anti-chain in P, then we are done! Otherwise we have ai ≤ a for some i. Then K={a} {x Ci : x ≤ ai } is a chain in P and there is no n-element anti-chain in P\K. Why? Thus P\K is the union of n-1 chains. a a1 an a2 .... A={a1,...,an} C2 C1 Cn

9
Thm 6.2. (Mirsky 1971) If P possesses no chain of m+1 elements, then P is the union of m antichains. Pf: (By ind. on m) It is true for m=1. why? Assume it is true up to m-1. Let P be a poset without chain of m+1 elements. Let M be the set of maximal elements of P. Then M is an antichain. Why? M

10
**Suppose x1<x2<…<xm were a chain in P\M.**

Then it would also be a maximal chain in P and hence xm∈M. →← Hence P\M has no chain of length m. By ind. hypothesis, P\M is the union of m-1 antichains. This proves the theorem ▧

11
Emanuel Sperner (9/ – 31/1 1980) a German mathematician Thm 6.3. (Sperner 1928) If A1,…, Am are subsets of N={1,2,…,n} such that Ai is not a subset of Aj, if i≠j, then

12
Pf: (by Lubell 1966) Consider the poset of subsets of N and ={A1,…, Am} is an antichain. Ø⊆{1} ⊆{1, 2} ⊆…⊆{1,…,n} ~ a maximal chain There are n! different maximal chain. Also, there are exactly k!(n-k)! maximal chains containing a given k-subset of N. Count the ordered pair (A, ), where A∈ and is a maximal chain and A∈. Each maximal chain contains at most one member of an antichain.

13
**Let αk denote the number of sets A∈ with |A|=k.**

Then there are maximal chains passing . since is maximized for and ∑αk=m ▧

14
**G(X∪Y, E) has a complete matching iff |Γ(A)| ≥ |A| for all A⊆X. Pf:**

Prove Thm 5.1 by Thm 6.1: G(X∪Y, E) has a complete matching iff |Γ(A)| ≥ |A| for all A⊆X. Pf: Let |X|=n, |Y|=n’ ≥ n. Introduce a partial order by defining xi<yi iff there is an edge from xi to yi. Suppose the largest antichain contain s elements, say {x1,…,xh, y1,…, yk}, where h+k=s.

15
**Since Γ({x1,…,xh}) ⊆Y\{y1,…,yk}, we have h ≤ n’-k.**

Hence s ≤ n’. The poset is the union of s disjoint chains. This consists of a matching of size a, the remaining n-a elements of X and n’-a elements of Y. Therefore n+n’-a=s ≤ n’, size of antichain. ⇒ n ≤ a ⇒∃a complete matching ▧

16
Paul Erdös (1913 – 1996) 柯召 Richard Rado Thm 6.4. (Erdös-Ko-Rado 1961) Let ={A1,…,Am} be a collection of m distinct k-subset of [n], where k ≤ n/2, with the property that any two of the subsets have a nonempty intersection. Then

17
**Pf: Consider F={F1,…Fn}, where Fi={i, i+1,…,i+k-1}.**

Fi intersects at most one of {l, l+1, l+k-1}, {l-k,…, l-1} is in , (i < l < i+k) Thus, |∩ F | ≤ k. Let п be obtained from by applying a permutation п to [n]. Then |∩ Fп| ≤ k. Let ∑:=∑п∈Sn|∩ Fп| ≤ k·n!. n 2 k

18
**There are k!(n-k)! Permutations п such that =Aj. Why? **

1 i-1 i i+k-1 i+k n ..... ..... ..... Aj Fix any Aj∈, Fi∈. There are k!(n-k)! Permutations п such that =Aj. Why? Hence ∑ =m·n·k!(n-k)! ≤ k·n! ▧

19
Thm 6.5. Let ={A1,…, Am} be a collection of m subsets of [n] such that Ai ⊈ Aj and Ai∩Aj≠Ø if i≠j and |Ai| ≤ k ≤ n/2 for all i. Then

20
**Pf: (i) If all |Ai|=k, then it has been proved in Thm 6.4.**

(ii) Let A1,…, As be the subsets with the smallest cardinality, say l ≤ n/2 – 1. Consider all the (l+1)-subsets Bj of [n] that contain one or more of the sets Ai, 1 ≤ i ≤ s. Note that Bj ∉. Each Ai is in exactly n-l of the Bj’s and each Bj contains at most l+1 ≤ n-l of the Ai’s. By Thm 5.1, we can match each Ai, 1 ≤ i ≤s, with Bi such that Ai⊆Bi.

21
Replace A1,…, As by B1,…, Bs, then the new collection ’ satisfies the conditions of the theorem and the subsets of smallest cardinality have size > l. By induction, we reduce to case (i) ▧

22
**Béla Bollobás (born August 3, 1943 in Budapest, Hungary)**

a leading Hungarian mathematician Thm 6.6. (Bollobàs 1973) Let ={A1,…, Am} be a collection of m subsets of [n], where |Ai| ≤ n/2 for i=1,…, m, with the property that any two of the subsets have a nonempty intersection and Ai ⊈ Aj . Then

23
Pf: Let п be a permutation of [n] placed on a circle and say that Ai∈п if the elements of Ai occur consecutively somewhere on that circle. As in Thm 6.4, if Ai∈п, then Aj∈п for at most |Ai| values of j. Define n 2

24
Thus, ▧

Similar presentations

OK

2.6 Equivalence Relation §1.Equivalence relation §Definition 2.18: A relation R on a set A is called an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric,

2.6 Equivalence Relation §1.Equivalence relation §Definition 2.18: A relation R on a set A is called an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric,

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

By using this website, you agree with our use of **cookies** to functioning of the site. More info in our Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.

Ads by Google

Ppt on political parties and electoral process of the philippines Ppt on bing search engine Edit ppt on iphone Ppt only output devices Ppt on class c power amplifier Ppt on job satisfaction and attitude Ppt on argand plane Ppt on thermal conductivity of insulating powder coating Ppt on entrepreneurship development institute of india Best ppt on earth day