Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

UPPER SADDLE RIVER DISTRICT TESTING REPORT BOE Presentation – 10.20.14 Devin Severs, Curriculum Coordinator.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "UPPER SADDLE RIVER DISTRICT TESTING REPORT BOE Presentation – 10.20.14 Devin Severs, Curriculum Coordinator."— Presentation transcript:

1 UPPER SADDLE RIVER DISTRICT TESTING REPORT BOE Presentation – Devin Severs, Curriculum Coordinator

2 How did our students perform on NJASK? 1. General Performance 2. State and District Factor Group (DFG) Comparison 3. Sub-Group Disaggregated Data 4. Historical Perspective 5. PARCC Assessments

3 GENERAL PERFORMANCE Upper Saddle River Performance Advanced Proficiency, Proficiency, and Partial Proficiency

4 NJASK General Performance ( ) Language Arts Gr.Adv. Prof. Part. Prof Mathematics Gr.Adv. Prof. Part. Prof

5 NJASK General Performance ( ) Science GradeAdv. Prof. Part. Prof

6 STATE AND DISTRICT FACTOR GROUP COMPARISON DFG and State Comparison, Total Proficiency and Advanced Proficiency

7 District Factor Group J Districts The DFG Model The DFG is an index of socioeconomic status that is created using data for several "indicators" available in the decennial Census of Population. Socioeconomic status cannot be measured directly. Rather, the literature holds that it is a function of other, measurable quantities (traditionally, the basic three are income, occupation, and education). Therefore, the DFG is a composite statistical index created using statistical procedures, a "model" of socioeconomic status, and input data for various socioeconomic traits. Seven indices were developed from the census data as follows: *Percent of population with no high school diploma *Percent with some college *Income *Unemployment *Occupation *Population density *Poverty Note: Taken from NJ Department of Education

8 District Factor Group J Districts Glen Rock HoHoKus Northern Highlands Ridgewood Saddle River Woodcliff Lake Haddonfield Essex Fells Millburn North Caldwell Tewskbury West Windsor Plainsboro Cranbury Little Silver Rumson Chatham Harding Mendham Township Mendham Boro Mountain Lakes Bernards Township Montgomery Township According to the 2000 census

9 NJ ASK DFG & State Comparison (Total Proficiency and Advanced Proficiency) Grades 3-5 ComparisonLAL (Total Proficiency) LAL (Advanced Proficiency) Math (Total Proficiency) Math (Advanced Proficiency) USR [3] * DFG [3] State [3] USR [4] DFG [4] State [4] USR [5] DFG [5] State [5]

10 NJ ASK DFG & State Comparison (Total Proficiency and Advanced Proficiency) Grades 6-8 ComparisonLAL (Total Proficiency) LAL (Advanced Proficiency) Math (Total Proficiency) Math (Advanced Proficiency) USR [6]96.2* DFG [6] State [6] USR [7] DFG [7] State [7] USR [8] *76.2 DFG [8] State [8]

11 Language Arts Literacy General Education- Advanced Proficient Comparison

12 Math General Education- Advanced Proficient Comparison

13 NJ ASK DFG & State Comparison (Total Proficiency and Advanced Proficiency) Science ComparisonTotal ProficiencyAdvanced Proficiency USR [4] * DFG [4] State [4] USR [8]98.4*71.3 DFG [8] State [8]

14 SUB-GROUP DATA

15 Special Education: 3 rd – 5 th grades Grade/ Subject Partial Proficiency Total ProficiencyTotal Proficiency (DFG) Total Proficiency (State) 3 rd LAL rd Math th LAL th Math th Science th LAL th Math

16 Special Education: 6 th -8 th grades Grade/ Subject Partial Proficiency Total ProficiencyTotal Proficiency (DFG) Total Proficiency (State) 6 th LAL th Math th LAL th Math th LAL th Math th Science

17 SchoolClusterPart. Prof.Prof.Adv. Prof. Bogert Cavallini Language Arts SchoolClusterPart. Prof.Prof.Adv. Prof. Bogert Cavallini Math Asian Subgroup Language Arts and Math

18 HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE 3-Year Span

19 Language Arts (General Education) Historical Perspective

20 Math (General Education) Historical Perspective

21 CONCLUSIONS Critical Findings Discussion and Growth

22 NJ ASK Conclusions (2014) Critical Findings ❑ USR outperformed the DFG (J) in language arts and mathematics (advanced proficiency) in the majority of grade levels ❑ Bogert’s total proficiency outperformed the DFG in every area ❑ Cavallini improved advanced proficiency in math and LAL ❑ Successful implementation of Connected Math (6 & 7) Language Arts: 1. Continue with intense focus on curriculum writing (units of study), K-8 articulation, and in-service staff development 2. Continue partnership with TCRWP 1. On-site PD 2. Conference Days 3. Principal Leadership Group 3. Focused SGOs 4. Targeted PD for special education teachers 5. Quad-district writing articulation (K-8) Mathematics: 6. Implementation of Connected Math (8), teacher workshops, and in-service staff development and coaching 7. Support of elementary mathematics instruction-alignment to the Common Core and PARCC 8. Focused SGOs 9. Targeted PD for special education teachers

23 PARCC ASSESSMENT

24 PARCC Snapshot: 1. Performance-based nature of assessment [context, multiple skills, problem solving] 2. Technology-enhanced tasks 3. Multiple responses versus multiple choice 4. Evidence-based claims

25 ELA PARCC Sample Grade 4 ELA PARCC Sample Grade 7

26 Math PARCC Sample Question Grade 3

27 PARCC Preparation 1. Summer PARCC Institute 2. “Walk in the PARCC PD Series” in all buildings 3. Revise assessment items to reflect technology- enhancement and multiple responses 4. Incorporate performance based tasks throughout instruction Task created at PARCC Institute

28 State Implementation Timeline PARCC Assessments Part I: Performance-Based Assessment (3-5) March 2 – 27, 2015 Part II: End of Year Assessment (3-5) April 27 – May 22, 2015 NJASK - Science May 27 th (4 & 8)


Download ppt "UPPER SADDLE RIVER DISTRICT TESTING REPORT BOE Presentation – 10.20.14 Devin Severs, Curriculum Coordinator."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google