Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMadilyn Shrieves Modified about 1 year ago

1
Flat-earth economics Far-reaching consequences of flat payoff functions David Pannell University of Western Australia

2
Starting point 1983

3
Payoffs profit expected value of profit expected utility any other objective function that has an internal optimal solution

4
Example: whole farm plan 51% 92%

5
Example: herbicide dose 0.44 0.15

6
Monopolist’s pricing decision

7
Jardine (1975): “On presenting information to agronomists about flat profit curves for fertlizers, I observed such reactions as complete disbelief, blank incomprehension, incipient terror, and others less readily categorized.”

8
Flat payoff functions are: A consistent empirical finding (almost universal) Very important Rarely acknowledged Debated in 1975, but apparently not since

9
What is behind it?

10
Diversified portfolios e.g. because of risk aversion variable resource quality resource constraints complementarity between enterprises

11
Implications

12
Implication 1: Margin for error Decisions without careful analysis Can consider extra factors Risk Personal preference DSSs focus on plateau, not optimum

13
Implication 2: The value of monitoring Sustainability indicators/EMS The value of information decision theory framework What difference to the decision? information decision What difference then to payoff? decision payoff Weighted by probabilities Value often low

14
Implication 2: The value of monitoring If payoff function is flat: Info may change decision But not change payoff by much

15
Implication 2: The value of monitoring If payoff function steep Optimal solution obvious More info doesn’t change it Either way, low info value

16
Implication 3: Precision farming Jock Anderson (1975): "In pursuing optimal levels of decision variables, precision is pretence and great accuracy is absurdity."

17
Implication 3: Precision farming Example: lime application for acidity Very low precision: same low rate for all Low precision: rate set for each soil type for each region Moderate precision: paddock by paddock (High: adjust within paddock)

18
Example: liming acidic soils Typical payoff function

19
Implication 3: Precision farming Value of information $/ha from greater precision of info Change from moderate to high 0 0 0

20
Implication 4: Value of research Consider two types of research increases the yield of a crop by 20% (increases yield directly) provides info that yield will be 20% higher than previously believed (increases yield indirectly through adjustments to input levels) Which is more valuable?

21
Implication 4: Value of research Value of improving technology = P2,2 - P1,1 Value of improving information = P2,2 - P1,2

22
Implication 5: Risk

23
Accounting for risk aversion makes a small difference to payoffs (CE or U) Example: herbicides again

24
Example: herbicide dose R=0 R=3.2

25
A non-implication: Externalities “Surely, if you consider externalities, the point breaks down!” payoff function stops being flat input level starts to really matter

26
Externality doesn’t change story 90% range

27
Externality doesn’t change story

29
Conclusion Flatness far more important than optimum Should emphasise flatness and its implications to our students to our clients to ourselves

30
Conclusion Implications include Margin for error/Flexibility Low value of monitoring Diminishing marginal value of precision Research: value of new technology greater than value of new information Risk aversion not very important in normative studies

31
www.davidpannell.net Pannell, D.J. (2006). Flat-earth economics: The far-reaching consequences of flat payoff functions in economic decision making, Review of Agricultural Economics 28(4): 553-566.

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google