Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMakenna Staple Modified over 3 years ago

1
David Evans http://www.cs.virginia.edu/evans CS150: Computer Science University of Virginia Computer Science Lecture 26: Proving Uncomputability Visualization of E8E8

2
2 Lecture 26: Proving Computability The Halting Problem Input: a specification of a procedure P Output: If evaluating an application of P halts, output true. Otherwise, output false.

3
3 Lecture 26: Proving Computability halts? Examples > (halts? ‘(lambda () (+ 3 3))) #t > (halts? ‘(lambda () (define (f) (f)) (f))) #f > (halts? `(lambda () (define (fibo n) (if (or (= n 1) (- n 2))) 1 (+ (fibo (- n 1)) (fibo (- n 2)))))) (fibo 100)) #t

4
4 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Halting Examples > (halts? `(lambda () (define (sum-of-two-primes? n) ;;; try all possibilities... ) (define (test-goldbach n) (if (not (sum-of-two-primes? n)) #f ; Goldbach Conjecture wrong (test-goldbach (+ n 2)))) (test-goldbach 2)) ? Goldbach Conjecture (see GEB, p. 394): Every even integer can be written as the sum of two primes.

5
5 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Can we define halts? ? We could try for a really long time, get something to work for simple examples, but could we solve the problem – make it work for all possible inputs?

6
6 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Informal Proof (define (paradox) (if (halts? ‘paradox) (loop-forever) #t)) If paradox halts, the if test is true and it evaluates to (loop-forever) - it doesn’t halt! If paradox doesn’t halt, the if test if false, and it evaluates to #t. It halts!

7
7 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Proof by Contradiction 1.Show X is nonsensical. 2.Show that if you have A you can make X. 3.Therefore, A must not exist. X = paradox A = halts? algorithm

8
8 Lecture 26: Proving Computability How convincing is our Halting Problem proof? (define (paradox) (if (halts? ‘paradox) (loop-forever) #t)) If contradict-halts halts, the if test is true and it evaluates to (loop-forever) - it doesn’t halt! If contradict-halts doesn’t halt, the if test if false, and it evaluates to #t. It halts! This “proof” assumes Scheme exists and is consistent! Scheme is too complex to believe this...we need a simpler model of computation (in two weeks).

9
9 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Evaluates-to-3 Problem Input: A procedure specification P Output: true if evaluating (P ) would result in 3; false otherwise. Is “Evaluates to 3” computable?

10
10 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Proof by Contradiction 1.Show X is nonsensical. 2.Show that if you have A you can make X. 3.Therefore, A must not exist. X = halts? algorithm A = evaluates-to-3? algorithm

11
11 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Undecidability Proof Suppose we could define evaluates-to-3? that decides it. Then we could define halts?: (define (halts? P) (evaluates-to-3? ‘(lambda () (begin (P) 3)))) if #t: it evaluates to 3, so we know (P) must halt. if #f: the only way it could not evaluate to 3, is if (P) doesn’t halt. (Note: assumes (P) cannot produce an error.)

12
12 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Hello-World Problem Input: An expression specification E Output: true if evaluating E would print out “Hello World!”; false otherwise. Is the Hello-World Problem computable?

13
13 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Uncomputability Proof Suppose we could define prints-hello-world? that solves it. Then we could define halts?: (define (halts? P) (prints-hello-world? ‘(begin ((remove-prints P)) (print “Hello World!”))))

14
14 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Proof by Contradiction 1.Show X is nonsensical. 2.Show that if you have A you can make X. 3.Therefore, A must not exist. X = halts? algorithm A = prints-hello-world? algorithm

15
15 Lecture 26: Proving Computability Charge Next week: –Monday: computability of virus detection, AliG problem; history of Object-Oriented programming –Wednesday, Friday: implementing interpreters After next week: –Scheme is very complicated (requires more than 1 page to define) –To have a convincing proof, we need a simpler programming model in which we can write paradox: Turing’s model

Similar presentations

OK

Introduction to Computer Science. A Quick Puzzle Well-Formed Formula any formula that is structurally correct may be meaningless Axiom A statement.

Introduction to Computer Science. A Quick Puzzle Well-Formed Formula any formula that is structurally correct may be meaningless Axiom A statement.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google