Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAiden Wind Modified about 1 year ago

1

2
Reliability

3
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Reliability Reliability means repeatability or consistency A measure is considered reliable if it would give us the same result over and over again (assuming that what we are measuring isn’t changing!)

4
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Definition of Reliability Reliability usually “refers to the consistency of scores obtained by the same persons when they are reexamined with the same test on different occasions, or with different sets of equivalent items, or under other variable examining conditions (Anastasi & Urbina, 1997). Dependable, consistent, stable, constant Gives the same result over and over again

5
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Validity vs Reliability

6
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Variability and reliability What is the acceptable range of error in measurement – Bathroom scale ±1 kg – Body thermometer ±0.2 C – Baby weight scale ±20 g – Clock with hands ±5 min – Outside thermometer ±1 C

7
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Variability and reliability We are completely comfortable with a bathroom scale accurate to ±1 kg, since we know that individual weights vary over far greater ranges than this, and typical changes from day to day are about the same order of magnitude.

8
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Reliability True Score Theory Measurement Error Theory of reliability Types of reliability Standard error of measurement

9
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh True Score Theory

10
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh True Score Theory Every measurement is an additive composite of two components: 1. True ability (or the true level) of the respondent on that measure 2. Measurement error

11
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh True Score Theory Individual differences in test scores – “True” differences in characteristic being assessed – “Chance” or random errors.

12
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh True Score Theory What might be considered error variance in one situation may be true variance in another (e.g Anxiety)

13
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Can we observe the true score? X = T + e x We only observe the measurement, we don’t observe what’s on the right side of equation (only God knows what those values are)

14
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh True Score Theory var(X) = var(T) + var( e x ) The variability of the measure is the sum of the variability due to true score and the variability due to random error

15
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh What is error variance? Conditions irrelevant to purpose of the test – Environment (e.g., quiet v. noisy) – Instructions (e.g., written v. verbal) – Time limits (e.g., limited v. unlimited) – Rapport with test taker All test scores have error variance.

16
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Measurement Error Measurement error: – Random – Systematic

17
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Measurement Error

18
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Measurement Error Random error: effects are NOT consistent across the whole sample, they elevate some scores and depress others – Only adds noise; does not affect mean score

19
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Measurement Error Systematic error: effects are generally consistent across a whole sample – Example: environmental conditions for group testing (e.g., temperature of the room) – Generally either consistently positive (elevate scores) or negative (depress scores)

20
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Measurement Error

21
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Measurement Error

22
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Theory of Reliability

23
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Reliability Reliability = The variance of the true score The variance of the measure Reliability = Var(T) Var(X)

24
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh How big is an estimate of Reliability? Var(T) Reliability = Var(T) Var(X) = Var(T) + Var( e ) Reliability = Subject variability Subject variability + measurement error

25
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh We can’t compute reliability because we can’t calculate the variance of the true score; but we can get an estimate of the variability.

26
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Estimate of Reliability Observations would be related to each other to the degree that they share true scores. For example consider the correlation between X 1 and X 2 :

27
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh

28
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Types of Reliability 1.Test-Retest Reliability Used to assess the consistency of a measure from one time to another 2.Alternate-form Reliability Used to assess the consistency of the results of two tests constructed the same way from the same content domain

29
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Types of Reliability 3.Split-half Reliability Used to assess the consistency of results across items within a test by splitting them into two equivalent halves Kuder-Richardson Reliability Used to assess the extent to which items are homogenous when items have a dichotomous response, e.g. “yes/no” items.

30
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Types of Reliability Cronbach’s alpha (α) Reliability Compares the consistency of response of all items on the scale (Likert scale or linear graphic response format) 4.Inter-Rater or Inter-Scorer Reliability Used to assess the concordance between two or more observers scores of the same event or phenomenon for observational data

31
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Test-Retest Reliability Definition: When the same test is administered to the same individual (or sample) on two different occasions

32
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Test-Retest Reliability: Used to assess the consistency of a measure from one time to another

33
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Test-Retest Reliability Statistics used – Pearson r or Spearman rho Warning – Correlation decreases over time because error variance INCREASES (and may change in nature) – Closer in time the two scores were obtained, the more the factors which contribute to error variance are the same

34
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Test-Retest Reliability Warning – Circumstances may be different for both test-taker and physical environment. – Transfer effects like practice and memory might play a role on the second testing occasion

35
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Alternate-form Reliability Definition: Two equivalent forms of the same measure are administered to the same group on two different occasions

36
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Alternate-form Reliability: Used to assess the consistency of the results of two tests constructed same way from the same content domain

37
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Alternate-form Reliability Statistic used – Pearson r or Spearman rho Warning – Even when randomly chosen, the two forms may not be truly parallel – It is difficult to construct equivalent tests

38
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Alternate-form Reliability Warning – Even when randomly chosen, the two forms may not be truly parallel – It is difficult to construct equivalent tests – The tests should have the same number of items, same scoring procedure, uniform content and item difficulty level

39
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Split-half Reliability Definition: Randomly divide the test into two forms; calculate scores for Form A, B; calculate Pearson r as index of reliability

40
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Split-half Reliability

41
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Split-half Reliability (Spearman-Brown formula)

42
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Split-half Reliability Warning The correlation between the odd and even scores are generally an underestimation of the reliability coefficient because it is based only on half the test.

43
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Cronbach’s alpha & Kuder-Richardson-20 Measures the extent to which items on a test are homogeneous; mean of all possible split-half combinations – Kuder-Richardson-20 (KR-20): for dichotomous data – Cronbach’s alpha: for non-dichotomous data

44
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Cronbach’s alpha (α)

45
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Cronbach’s alpha (α) (Coefficient alpha)

46
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Kuder-Richardson (KR-20)

47
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Inter-Rater or Inter-Observer Reliability: Used to assess the degree to which different raters or observers give consistent estimates of the same phenomenon

48
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Inter-rater Reliability Definition Measures the extent to which multiple raters or judges agree when providing a rating of behavior

49
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Inter-rater Reliability Statistics used – Nominal/categorical data Kappa statistic – Ordinal data Kendall’s tau to see if pairs of ranks for each of several individuals are related –Two judges rate 20 elementary school children on an index of hyperactivity and rank order them

50
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Inter-rater Reliability Statistics used – Interval or ratio data Pearson r using data obtained from the hyperactivity index

51
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Factors affecting Reliability Whether a measure is speeded Variability in individual scores Ability level

52
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Whether a measure is speeded For speeded measures, test-retest and equivalent-form reliability are more appropriate. Split-half techniques may be considered if the split occurs according to time rather than number of items.

53
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Variability in individual scores Correlation is normally affected by the range of individual differences in a group. Sometimes, smaller subgroups display correlation coefficients which are completely different from that of the whole group. This phenomenon is known as range restriction.

54
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Ability level One must also consider the variability and ability levels of samples. It is advisable to compute separate reliability coefficients for homogeneous and heterogeneous subgroups.

55
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Interpretation of Reliability One must ask oneself the following questions: How high must the coefficient of reliability be? How is it interpreted? What is the standard error of measurement?

56
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Magnitude of reliability coefficient Anastasi & Urbina(1997)0.8 – 0.9 Huysamen (1996) at least 0.85 for individuals at least 0.65 for groups Smit (1996) 0.8 – 0.85 for personality & interest at least 0.9 for aptitude

57
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Standard Error of the Measurement Definition: Estimate of the amount of error usually attached to an individual’s obtained test score – As SEM ↑, test reliability ↓ – As SEM ↓, test reliability ↑

58
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Standard Error of the Measurement

59
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Standard Error of the Measurement Confidence Interval: Uses SEM to calculate a band or range of scores that has a high probability of including the person’s true score. Example: 95% confidence interval means only 5 times in 100 will the person’s TRUE score lie outside this range of scores.

60
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Reliability Formula: CI = Obtained score + z(SEM) z = 1.0 for 68% level z = 1.44 for 85% level z = 1.65 for 90% level z = 1.96 for 95% level z = 2.58 for 99% level

61
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Reliability of standardized tests An acceptable standardized test should have reliability coefficients of at least: 0.95 for internal consistency 0.90 for test-retest (stability) 0.85 for alternate-forms (equivalency )

62
IOP 301-T Mr. Rajesh Gunesh Reliability: Implications Evaluating a test – What types of reliability have been calculated and with what samples? – What are the strengths of the reliability coefficients? – What is the SEM for a test score – How does this information influence decision to use and interpret test scores?

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google