Presentation on theme: "Individual Rights (Due Process) vs Public Order (Crime Control)"— Presentation transcript:
1Individual Rights (Due Process) vs Public Order (Crime Control)
2Public Order or Individual Rights What Prevails Today? Both have been present throughout the 20th CenturyEarly 1900’s saw the Public Order or Crime Control in action1950’s and 1960’s saw the due process revolution and Individual RightsEarl Warren Supreme Court significantly expanded rights of the accused, limiting police powerRising Crime rates in 1970’s and 1980’s increased pressure on politicians and judges to “Get Tough on Crime” slowed down the due process revolution
3Public Order & Crime Control Public Order supports and advocates for crime controlThe belief according to Herbert Packer is that police are in a better position than the courts to determine guilt.Believes that Judges should operate on a presumption of guilt, that suspects brought before the court are probably guiltyThe few restrictions should be put on police investigations
4Individual Rights & Due Process Believe that individual rights rely heavily on the court and its role in upholding the legal procedures of establishing guiltAccepts that a person who is factually guilty should be allowed to be free if the criminal justice system fails to follow legal procedures in proving guiltyRelies heavily on formality in the criminal justice system
5US Supreme CourtFor the past 30 years the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th Amendments of the Bill of Rights in the manner protective of the rights of suspects, defendants and prisoners.In recent years, however, the focus has shifted from restrictions on the police and conduct of trials to concerns of about sentencing and punishment
6U.S. Supreme CourtThe U.S. government is the only institution in society that has a legitimate right to exert physical force over us.Therefore we have a right not to be arrested and punished for what we have said or done except under certain clearly specified conditions.
7Individual RightsProtects individuals from restrictive government actions against life and liberty against individuals living in AmericaCivil Rights Era (Mid 1950s -1970s)Brought forth injustices occurring in AmericaRecognized fundamental personal rights previous denied illegally to many people based on their gender, race, ethnicity, sexual preference or disabilityExpanded to rights of criminal defendants, probationers, parolees, inmates and victims of crimesLimited police power in apprehension, search and seizure and interrogation of suspects.Contributed to the development of new laws and court decisions
8Individual Rights in America Rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, particularly the first 10 amendments (Bill of Rights), to individuals living in America.Protects and guarantees certain inalienable rights to all U.S. citizens and most non-citizens living in the U.S.Especially important to criminal defendants facing formal processing by the Criminal Justice System
9BILL OF RIGHTS First Amendment Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment (Freedom of religion, speech, assembly, and the Press)Fourth Amendment(Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.)Fifth AmendmentNo person to be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
10BILL OF RIGHTS Sixth Amendment Eighth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Right to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury, right to be informed of the facts of the accusation, right to confront witnesses and have the assistance of counsel.Eighth AmendmentNo excessive bail or cruel and unusual punishment shall be imposed.Fourteenth AmendmentAll persons (citizens and non-citizens) within the US are entitled to due process and the equal protection of the laws.
11Individual Rights (Due Process) Assumes freedom is so important that every effort must be made to ensure the decisions are fair and reliable, based on law and formal proceedings.Due Process values hold that the State must prove a person’s guilt within the confines of a process designed to safeguard personal liberties as enumerated in the Bill of RightsProtect the individual against the immense power of the state
12Individual Rights Goals Limiting state power by assuring the constitutional rights of the accusedProviding even guilty offenders with full protection of the lawAssuring that all accused criminals receive the same treatmentProtecting the civil rights of prisoners
13Individual Rights Favored Policies Due Process ModelOpen the process to scrutiny by the media and publicAbolish the death penaltyLimit police powers to arbitrary search, interrogate and seize criminal suspectsLimit discretion and formalize criminal justice procedures so that all suspects and convicted offenders receive the same treatmentIncrease funding for rehabilitation and education in prisons and jails
14Individual Rights: View of Criminality Criminal behavior can be attributed to social and biological factorsCriminals can be rehabilitated and returned to the community
15Public Order (Crime Control) Assumes freedom is so important that every effort must be made to reduce crime so things like efficiency, speed and finality are emphasized. The system must have a high capacity to catch, convict and dispose of offenders.Values emphasize speed and efficiency in criminal justice system.The benefits of lower crime rates outweigh any possible costs to individual rightsDeter crimeProtect citizens from crimeIncapacitate criminalsProvide quick and efficient justice
16Public Order GoalsPromoting discretion and limiting bureaucratic red tape in criminal justice institutionsMaking it easier for police to arrest criminalsReducing legal restrictions on proving guilt in a criminal trial
17Public Order Favored Policies Crime Control ModelMore policeMore jails and prisonsHarsher penalties (including increased use of the death penalty) and longer sentences
18Public Order Wrongdoers are responsible for their own actions Wrongdoers have violated the social contract and can therefore be deprived of many of the rights afforded to law-abiding citizens
19Public OrderIn recent years Public Order supporters saw individual rights/civil rights as a contributing factor to the increase of crime in America.Public Order supporters saw individual rights as protecting the rights of dangerous criminals and lobbied for “Get Tough on Crime” laws.Public Order advocates believe that under certain circumstances, the interest of society should take precedence over individual rights.USA Patriot Act of 2001 Law resulting from the 9/11 Tragedy is supported by Public Order Advocates
20USA Patriot Act of 2001Expands terrorism laws to include “domestic terrorism” which could subject political organizations to surveillance, wiretapping, harassment, and criminal action for political advocacy.Expands the ability of law enforcement to conduct secret searches, gives them wide powers of phone and Internet surveillance, and access to highly personal medical, financial, mental health, and student records with minimal judicial oversight.
21USA Patriot Act of 2001Allows FBI Agents to investigate American citizens for criminal matters without probable cause of crime “intelligence purposes.”Permits non-citizens to be jailed based on mere suspicion and to be denied re-admission to the US for engaging in free speech.Suspects convicted of no crime may be detained indefinitely in six month increments without meaningful judicial review.
22Public Order Advocates USA Patriot Act Some key points of the act that designed to support the effort against terrorism:Counterterrorism Fund, and increased funding for the technical support center at the Federal Bureau of Investigation.Expansion of National Electronic Crime Task Force Initiative.Trade sanctions.The act also has specific sections geared toward preventing money laundering, border protection, the strengthening of criminal laws, and providing for victims of terrorism.
23Public OrderPublic order advocates believe that Individual Rights may have to sacrificed because of the followingTerrorismOrganized CrimeComputer and Internet CrimeGang ViolenceDrugs in AmericaGet Tough on Crime
24Individual Rights Advocates Believe that individual rights must be protected at all times as the U.S. Constitution guarantees certain inalienable rights to all people living in America.The County was built on the foundation of individual freedom against government intrusion in individual’s rights to privacy.Democracy is threaten by increasing government intrusions on private persons