We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClifton Meaders
Modified about 1 year ago
Copyright © 2003 by South- Western, a division of Thomson Learning1 Chapter Three Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision- Making Guidelines
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning2 Decision Criteria for Ethical Reasoning The following three criteria can be used in ethical reasoning: Moral reasoning must be logical Factual evidence cited to support a person’s judgment should be accurate, relevant, and complete Ethical standards used should be consistent A simple but powerful question can be used throughout your decision-making process in solving ethical dilemmas: What is my motivation for choosing a course of action?
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning3 Ethical Relativism: A Self-Interest Approach Ethical relativism holds that no universal standards or rules can be used to guide or evaluate the morality of an act. This view argues that people set their own moral standards for judging their actions. This is also referred to as naïve relativism. The logic of ethical relativism extends to culture.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning4 Ethical Relativism: A Self-Interest Approach Benefits include: Ability to recognize the distinction between individual and social values, customs, and moral standards Problems include: Imply an underlying laziness Contradicts everyday experience Relativists can become absolutists Relativism and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning5 Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist (Results-Based) Approach The basic view holds that an action is judged as right, good, or wrong on the basis of its consequences. The moral authority that drives utilitarianism is the calculated consequences or results of an action, regardless of other principles that determine the means or motivations for taking the action. Utilitarianism includes other tenets.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning6 Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist (Results-Based) Approach Problems with utilitarianism include: No agreement exists about the definition of the “good” to be maximized No agreement exists about who decides How are the costs and benefits of nonmonetary stakes measured? Does not consider the individual Principles of rights and justice are ignored Utilitarianism and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning7 Universalism: A Deontological (Duty-Based) Approach This view is also referred to as deontological ethics or nonconsequentialist ethics and holds that the means justify the ends of an action, not the consequences. Kant’s principle of the categorical imperative places the moral authority for taking action on an individual’s duty toward other individuals and humanity. The categorical imperative consists of two parts.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning8 Universalism: A Deontological (Duty-Based) Approach The major weaknesses of universalism and Kant’s categorical imperative include: Principles are imprecise and lack practical utility Hard to resolve conflicts of interest Does not allow for prioritizing one’s duties Universalism and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning9 Rights: An Entitlement-Based Approach Moral rights are based on legal rights and the principle of duty. Rights can override utilitarian principles. The limitations of rights include: Can be used to disguise and manipulate selfish, unjust political interests and claims Protection of rights can be at the expense of others Limits of rights come into question Rights and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning10 Justice: Procedures, Compensation, Retribution The principle of justice deals with fairness and equality. Two recognized principles of fairness that represent the principle of justice include: Equal rights compatible with similar liberties for others Social and economic inequality arrangement Four types of justice include: Compensatory Retributive Distributive Procedural
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning11 Justice: Procedures, Compensation, Retribution Problems using the principle of justice include: Who decides who is right and who is wrong? Who has moral authority to punish? Can opportunities and burdens be fairly distributed? Justice, rights, and power are really intertwined. Two steps in transforming justice: Be aware of your rights and power Establish legitimate power for obtaining rights Justice and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning12 Immoral, Amoral, Or Moral Management Immoral management means intentionally going against ethical principles of justice and of fair and equitable treatment of other stakeholders. Amoral management happens when others are treated negligently without concern for the consequences of actions or policies. Moral management places value on equitable, fair, and just concern of others involved.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning13 Individual Ethical Decision-Making Styles Stanley Krolick developed a survey that interprets individual primary and secondary ethical decision-making styles, that include: Individualism Altruism Pragmatism Idealism
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning14 Quick Ethical Tests The Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College suggests six questions to be asked before making a decision. Classical ethical tests: The Golden Rule The Intuition Ethic The Means-End Ethic Test of Common Sense Test of One’s Best Self Test of Ventilation Test of Purified Idea
Copyright © 2003 by South- Western, a division of Thomson Learning1 Chapter Three Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision- Making Guidelines.
Copyright © 2003 by South- Western, a division of Thomson Learning1 Ethical Principles Utilitarianism, Universalism, Rights, Justice, Quick Tests, And.
Summary of Logical Flaws in the Discussion Stoppers Stopper #2 Who am I to judge others? __________________ 1. Fails to distinguish between the act of.
Ethics in International Business 4. Ethics in International Business INTRODUCTION Ethics refers to accepted principles of right or wrong that govern the.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter One Ethical Reasoning: Implications for Accounting.
What is LD Debate?. Metallica is not music! To be music… you must be able to understand the lyrics. Standard Rule Test Principle.
Moral Reasoning and Decision Making. The aim in this session is to develop an understanding of how ethical decisions are made in practice, rather than.
Ethics and Social Responsibility Chapter 5. Copyright © 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. 2 Ethics and Social.
Professional Ethics For the Health and Safety Professional June 2004 ASSE Conference Las Vegas.
Ethics is a general term for what is often described as the "science (study) of morality". In other words, ethical behaviour is that which is "good"
Governance and Ethics (within decision making) Standards in Action Governance and Ethics (within decision making)
Business Ethics What you really need to know!. What is Ethics? A practice of deciding what is right or wrong. Ethical decisions must affect you or.
Ethics: Making Critical Decisions in Treatment Patricia Sherman, Ph.D., LCSW.
Chapter 2 Ethics in Our Law Lesson 2-1, What is Ethics?
Critical Thinking And the Educated Person. What is Critical Thinking? Problem solving Analyzing information Interpreting information Recognizing.
Chapter - 5 Understanding Requirements Unit II. Introduction Definition : “The broad spectrum of tasks and techniques that lead to an understanding of.
Law for Business and Personal Use © South-Western, a part of Cengage LearningSlide 1 Chapter 1 Laws and Their Ethical Foundation Chapter 1 Laws and Their.
Essentials of Contemporary Management, 1Ce. Copyright © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 3-1 Managing Ethics, Social Responsibility,
Robin Taverner - Education Advisor. In judging the overall effectiveness of schools, inspectors must take into account: the achievement of pupils.
Chapter 7: Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. The “good death” Euthanasia means ‘the good death’ and “to euthanize” means to bring about a person’s death.
Lesson 21 Lesson 2 : Analyzing Ethical Issues. Lesson 22 The Meaning Of An Ethical Issue Choosing among several ethical or unethical alternatives Other.
Immanuel Kant & Deontology Duty-based Ethics. Deontology Duty Focuses on the act itself –Truth-telling and promise keeping are right even when such actions.
Utilitarianism Maximize good. Jeremy Bentham Principle of utility: Maximize good... the greatest happiness of the whole community, ought to be the end.
Copyright 2008 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management: A Pacific Rim Focus 5e by Bartol, Tein, Matthews, Sharma Slides prepared by Rob Lawrence,
What Makes An Act Moral? A major difficulty for Kant’s theory is that it seems that not every universal maxim is a moral one – it could be trivial or.
WHAT SHOULD WE DO ABOUT SWEATSHOPS? THREE APPROACHES FOR DEALING WITH MORAL PROBLEMS AND HOW THEY APPLY TO THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN SWEATSHOPS.
Chapter 6 DECISION MAKING: THE ESSENCE OF THE MANAGERS JOB © Prentice Hall,
PLANNING THE AUDIT Individual audits must be properly planned to ensure: Appropriate and sufficient evidence is obtained to support the auditors opinion;
Chapter 1 - Managerial Decision Making Takesh Luckho.
Chapter 7 Management and Leadership Ms. Baumgartner Business Essentials.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.