We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClifton Meaders
Modified over 2 years ago
Copyright © 2003 by South- Western, a division of Thomson Learning1 Chapter Three Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision- Making Guidelines
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning2 Decision Criteria for Ethical Reasoning The following three criteria can be used in ethical reasoning: Moral reasoning must be logical Factual evidence cited to support a person’s judgment should be accurate, relevant, and complete Ethical standards used should be consistent A simple but powerful question can be used throughout your decision-making process in solving ethical dilemmas: What is my motivation for choosing a course of action?
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning3 Ethical Relativism: A Self-Interest Approach Ethical relativism holds that no universal standards or rules can be used to guide or evaluate the morality of an act. This view argues that people set their own moral standards for judging their actions. This is also referred to as naïve relativism. The logic of ethical relativism extends to culture.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning4 Ethical Relativism: A Self-Interest Approach Benefits include: Ability to recognize the distinction between individual and social values, customs, and moral standards Problems include: Imply an underlying laziness Contradicts everyday experience Relativists can become absolutists Relativism and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning5 Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist (Results-Based) Approach The basic view holds that an action is judged as right, good, or wrong on the basis of its consequences. The moral authority that drives utilitarianism is the calculated consequences or results of an action, regardless of other principles that determine the means or motivations for taking the action. Utilitarianism includes other tenets.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning6 Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist (Results-Based) Approach Problems with utilitarianism include: No agreement exists about the definition of the “good” to be maximized No agreement exists about who decides How are the costs and benefits of nonmonetary stakes measured? Does not consider the individual Principles of rights and justice are ignored Utilitarianism and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning7 Universalism: A Deontological (Duty-Based) Approach This view is also referred to as deontological ethics or nonconsequentialist ethics and holds that the means justify the ends of an action, not the consequences. Kant’s principle of the categorical imperative places the moral authority for taking action on an individual’s duty toward other individuals and humanity. The categorical imperative consists of two parts.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning8 Universalism: A Deontological (Duty-Based) Approach The major weaknesses of universalism and Kant’s categorical imperative include: Principles are imprecise and lack practical utility Hard to resolve conflicts of interest Does not allow for prioritizing one’s duties Universalism and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning9 Rights: An Entitlement-Based Approach Moral rights are based on legal rights and the principle of duty. Rights can override utilitarian principles. The limitations of rights include: Can be used to disguise and manipulate selfish, unjust political interests and claims Protection of rights can be at the expense of others Limits of rights come into question Rights and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning10 Justice: Procedures, Compensation, Retribution The principle of justice deals with fairness and equality. Two recognized principles of fairness that represent the principle of justice include: Equal rights compatible with similar liberties for others Social and economic inequality arrangement Four types of justice include: Compensatory Retributive Distributive Procedural
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning11 Justice: Procedures, Compensation, Retribution Problems using the principle of justice include: Who decides who is right and who is wrong? Who has moral authority to punish? Can opportunities and burdens be fairly distributed? Justice, rights, and power are really intertwined. Two steps in transforming justice: Be aware of your rights and power Establish legitimate power for obtaining rights Justice and stakeholder analysis.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning12 Immoral, Amoral, Or Moral Management Immoral management means intentionally going against ethical principles of justice and of fair and equitable treatment of other stakeholders. Amoral management happens when others are treated negligently without concern for the consequences of actions or policies. Moral management places value on equitable, fair, and just concern of others involved.
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning13 Individual Ethical Decision-Making Styles Stanley Krolick developed a survey that interprets individual primary and secondary ethical decision-making styles, that include: Individualism Altruism Pragmatism Idealism
Copyright © 2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning14 Quick Ethical Tests The Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College suggests six questions to be asked before making a decision. Classical ethical tests: The Golden Rule The Intuition Ethic The Means-End Ethic Test of Common Sense Test of One’s Best Self Test of Ventilation Test of Purified Idea
Copyright © 2003 by South- Western, a division of Thomson Learning1 Chapter Three Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision- Making Guidelines.
1 Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision-Making Guidelines.
Adapted by Jeffrey M. Wachtel, Ph. D.
Utilitarianism: calculation of costs(-) and benefits(+) Universalism: duty Virtue: character Relativism: societal consensus.
Business Ethics Chapter # 3 Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, and Decision-Making Guidelines The best kind of relationship in the world is the one in.
RELATIVISM Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şehnaz Şahinkarakaş. E THICAL R ELATIVISM Ethical Relativism: no universal/valid standards or rules can be used to guide or.
COMP 381. Agenda TA: Caitlyn Losee Books and movies nominations Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class Rawls and Moors.
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
1 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility l an oxymoron?!?! l What is GOOD vs. What is Bad! l behaviour of business and the treatment of stakeholders.
Unit 1- Business Ethics & Corporate Governance Rachna Bansal Jora.
1 Business ethics and social responsibility (chapt. 10) an oxymoron?!?! What is GOOD vs. What is Bad! behaviour of business and the treatment of stakeholders.
Ethics and Leadership. Outline What is ethics? Three approaches to resolving ethical conflicts Making ethical decisions.
COMP 381. What is ethics? philosophical study of morality Investigation of the nature, causes, or principles of reality, knowledge, or values, based on.
Ethical Decision Making Process. How to Resolve Ethical Dilemmas in Business Identify relevant facts Identify relevant issue(s) Identify primary stakeholders.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
Ch. 12–1 Business Communication Workshop Course Coordinator:Ayyaz Qadeer Lecture # 30.
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 5E Carroll & Buchholtz Copyright ©2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All.
Introduction to Ethics A rational study of the rules of conduct known as morals that describe how people should behave.
CODE TO WORD: ETHICS IN THE WORKPLACE Florida Gulf Coast University Hudson Rogers Fall 2003.
Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management Chapter 3.
Ethics - 1 Key Definitions Moral: “relating to principles of right and wrong” Ethics: “the discipline of dealing with what is good and bad and with.
ETHICAL APPROACHES JUSTICE ETHICS OF CARE RIGHTS UTILITARIANISM.
3-1 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS POLICY 12 TH EDITION THOMAS L. WHEELEN J. DAVID HUNGER CHAPTER 3 Ethics & Social Responsibility (continued)
Ethical Theories & Decision-Making Models The Three Principles The Potter Box The Bok Model The Nine Checkpoints The Ten Questions.
Ethical Theories and Decision Making Five theoretical approaches Moral decision making Deciding current issues.
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 2 Topic Outlines.
Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.
© 2005 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 1 Personal and Organizational Ethics Search the Web Nortel has posted its ethics policies on the.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
© 2012 Wanda Teays. All rights reserved. Rawls, like Kant, is a Deontological Ethicist. He emphasizes moral duty and obligations, rather than end goals.
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
PEP 570, DeGeorge, Chp. 3 10/28/20151 Chapter Three: Dr. DeGeorge Utilitarianism: Justice and Love.
ETHICS Definition Legal vs. ethical Frameworks or theories Ethical principles.
Chapter 7-1 Chapter 7 BUSINESS & SOCIETY Ethics and Stakeholder Management Carroll & Buchholtz 6e Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management,
Business Ethics Fundamentals 1 1. Ethical Dilemma 2 Ethics Law grey area.
Management Ethics and Social Responsibility MGMT 370 Chapter 5.
Frameworks for Moral Arguments From “Medicine and Moral Arguments” by Carol Levine, in Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Bioethical Issues,
Chapter 3: Ethics and Social Responsibility Prepared by David Ferrell, B-books, Ltd. Designed by Eric Brengle, B-books, Ltd. Copyright 2012 by Cengage.
Business Ethics Chapter # 1 Business Ethics the changing environment and stakeholder management.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter One Basic Principles: Ethics and Business.
Humanities 375, September 8, Why are we reading this book? u 1. To raise your sensitivity to circumstances involving information technology that.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.