We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHalie Dimick
Modified over 2 years ago
Trends in Teacher Evaluation Systems in Public Education CEC’S POSITION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Danielle Kovach- 2014 CEC Teacher of the Year Barbara Messinger –Elementary Principal- Fairfax County School District Kerri Larkin-Director, Academic Programs, Office of Specialized Instruction, District of Columbia Public Schools
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 How Did We Get Here? International Comparisons Uneven Teacher Evaluation Systems Political Context We Are Here!
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Where Are We Now? New Teacher Evaluation Systems Include: 35 States + Washington, DC use student achievement as a significant factor; 27 States + Washington, DC require annual evaluation; 19 States use evaluation to drive tenure decisions; 17 States require parent, student, peer surveys; 8 States are linking student performance to teachers and back to teacher preparation programs Source: National Council on Teacher Quality: State of the States 2013 http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/State_of_the_States_2013_Using_Teacher _Evaluations_NCTQ_Report http://www.nctq.org/dmsView/State_of_the_States_2013_Using_Teacher _Evaluations_NCTQ_Report
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Where Are We Now? (cont.) Measures of Teaching Practice Measures of Student Growth Outcome of Teacher Evaluation Observation(s) Student, Parent, Peer Surveys Review of artifacts/work samples IEP facilitation Whole school climate/achievement Standardized test scores Locally designed assessments Measuring growth Student learning objectives Examples of student work More than binary evaluation system Personnel decisions Compensation Professional development Impact on preparation programs Source: Center on Great Teachers & Leaders: Building Education Evaluation Systems that Support Students with Disabilities
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 “…States must carefully analyze instruments and results to make sure special education teachers are getting a fair deal.” - National Council on Teacher Quality State of the States 2013 Connect the Dots: Using evaluations of teacher effectiveness to inform policy and practice Where Are We Going?
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Danielle Kovach 2014 CEC Teacher of the Year
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Barbara Messinger Elementary Principal Fairfax County School District
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Kerri Larkin Director, Academic Programs Office of Specialized Instruction District of Columbia Public Schools
CEC’s Position on Special Education Teacher Evaluation System Components Complex Role Measure Evidence- Based Practice Recognize Professionalism Incorporate Research Dissemination
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 All educators must be included in one evaluation system. Evaluation systems must identify appropriate professional development opportunities for teachers based on the results of their evaluations. Evaluations must support continuous improvement. Evaluation processes and all measures of teacher effectiveness must be open and transparent to the teacher being evaluated. Teacher Evaluation Systems Shall: Include Fundamental System-Wide Components
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Evaluations must clearly identify and be based on a special education teacher’s specific role and responsibilities during a given school year. Evaluations must take into account the population of children and youth and their range of exceptionalities that special education teachers instruct. Evaluations must be conducted by evaluators with expertise related to evidence-based service delivery models and individualized teaching practices and interventions in special education. Teacher Evaluation Systems Shall: Identify the Complex Role of the Special Education Teacher
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Evaluations must be based on multiple reliable measures and indicators that support valid measurement of special education teacher effectiveness. Evaluations should never be based solely on student growth. Statistical models that estimate a teacher’s contribution to student growth, such as value-added models, should not be applied to any teacher until there is a general consensus among researchers that the model provides a valid estimate of a teacher’s contribution to student growth. Teacher Evaluation Systems Shall: Measure the Use of Evidence-Based Practices
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Use of IEP Multiple indicators of special education teacher effectiveness may include … IEP development and implementation. Evaluations should not use a student’s progress on their goals, objectives, and benchmarks in the IEP as a measure of a special education teacher’s contribution to student growth.
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Evaluations must respect special education teachers’ professional practice and provide them with constructive and actionable feedback, resources, and opportunities to assist in addressing any areas for professional development and lead to well-grounded personnel decisions. Special education teachers must have reasonable case loads and paperwork responsibilities; competitive salaries; benefits; access to resources; and positive working conditions. Teacher Evaluation Systems Shall: Recognize the Professionalism of Special Education Teachers
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Leaders of evaluation systems reforms must collaborate to ensure that the development and implementation of evaluation systems are carried out in a systematic, coordinated, and efficient manner. Research should identify reliable measures and indicators of student growth that can be validly used to evaluate special education teachers. Policy makers and leaders should consider the intended and unintended consequences of wide-scale implementation of teacher evaluation systems. Teacher Evaluation Systems Shall: Continually Incorporate Findings From Research
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 “If you don't like the road you're walking, start paving another one.” - Dolly Parton
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 CEC Tools For you! Teacher Evaluation Toolkit for Special Educators! Visit: www.cec.sped.org Policy & Advocacy CEC Position on Special Education Teacher Evaluation
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Learn, Understand, Navigate New Teacher Evaluation Systems with the Help of your CEC Colleagues Through this Online Dialog! Visit: www.cec.sped.orgwww.cec.sped.org CEC Tools For you!
© Council for Exceptional Children, 2013 Discussion Topic: How is the implementation of your new evaluation system going? Does your system address special education? What tools/resources do you need to ensure a fair system?
CEC’s Position SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION CEC CONVENTION SAN ANTONIO, TX 2013.
Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Special Educators Leading Change 2014 Virginia Stodola Teacher Evaluation Audra Ahumada Alternative Assessment Lisa.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter. Charter School Needs Board Management Finance Operations Communications Personnel Instruction.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
The Interstate School Leader Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards is a program of the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). The CCSSO is a.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Virginia Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers: Two Tiers Performance Standard Performance Indicator.
Virginia Uniform Performance Standards for Principals February 2013 Virginia Uniform Performance Standards for Principals February
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have… an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Consultation, Collaboration, and Teamwork for Students with Special Needs.
May 2011 Virginia Uniform Performance Standards for Teachers 0 (Updated November 2011)
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
Campanula Consulting Developing policy, principles and practice in primary school science assessment Professor Derek Bell Teacher Assessment in Primary.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Overview Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System.
Presented at State Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA) Conference San Antonio, Texas February, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment in Early Childhood: How Assessments.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Technical Assistance provided by a grant from the Chalkboard Project.
NATIONAL CENTER ON EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES University of Minnesota Rachel Quenemoen Cammy Lehr Martha Thurlow.
A Mission of Restoration Perspective Candidate: Principal of Grady High School Dr. Rasheen Booker.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
Standard 1Standard 2Standard 3Standard 4Standard 5Standard 6Standard 7Standard 8IndexPORTFOLIO.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. LOCAL.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Evaluation of Special Education Teachers Janel Payette RSE TASC Coordinator, OCM BOCES
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
1 Professional Development for Correctional Educators: EDJJ Professional Development Series Sarup R. Mathur Heather Baltodano Derrick Platt Pamela Harris.
EVAAS, Teacher Effectiveness Reports, and Teacher Evaluation November 2012.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Martha Thurlow and Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes CEC Preconvention Workshop #4 April 21, 2010.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.