We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlice Hoppe
Modified over 2 years ago
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com Identifying Research Gaps in Implementation of Zero Energy Building (ZEB). Chayanika Mitra Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. Annie. R. Pearce Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia OBJECTIVES PROCESS OVERVIEW Literature Review Identification of: 1.Research opportunities in context of ZEB. 2.Barriers in implementation of ZEB, based on content analysis. 3.Factors positively facilitating the adoption of ZEB among consumers. INITIAL LIST OF LITERATURE METHODOLOGY STEP 1: Identification of Literature. STEP 3: Mapping STEP 4: Gap Analysis REFERENCES United States is second only to Canada in energy use per person (DOE 2008). DOE defines a Zero Energy Building (ZEB) as a building with greatly reduced energy needs through efficiency gains such that the balance of the energy needs can be supplied by renewable technologies. It has been proven that these zero energy homes can lead to saving of energy up to 70% when compared to their traditionally built counterparts.(Parker et al. 2000). Fig 2 : Household Distribution of Energy Consumption (DOE 2008). Abdalla, G., Maas, G., and Huyghe, J. (2009). “Barriers to Zero Energy Construction (ZEC) Technically possible; why not succeed yet?” Proc., International passive and low energy architecture conference, Quebec, Canada, 3-5. Baechler, M. C., and Love, P. M. (2004). “Builders and Buyers Handbook for Improving New Home Efficiency, Comfort, and Durability in the Hot and Humid Climate.” Building America Best Practices Series: Volume 1, DOE, Oak Ridge, TN, 1-137. Brostrom, M., and Howell, G. (2008). “The challenges of designing and building a net zero energy home in a cold high-latitude climate.” Proc., International Solar cities Congress, Adelaide, South Australia, 17-29. Caird, S., Roy, R., and Herring, H. (2008). “Improving the energy performance of UK households: Results from surveys of consumer adoption and use of low – and zero-carbon technologies.” J. Energy Efficiency., 1(2), 149-166. Dixon, G., Abdel-Salam, T., and Kauffmann, P. (2010). “Evaluation of the effectiveness of an energy efficiency program for new home construction in eastern North Carolina.” J.Energy., 35(3), 1491- 1496. Department of Energy (DOE 2009a). “U.S. Department of Energy, Buildings Energy Data Book.” 2006 Data, (Sep. 1, 2010).http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/TableView.aspx?table=1.2.3 DOE (2009b). “U.S. Department of Energy, Buildings Energy Data Book.” 2006 Data, (Sep.1,2010). DOE (2009c). “U.S. Department of Energy, Buildings Energy Data Book.” 2006 Data, (Sep. 1, 2010).http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/TableView.aspx?table=3.1.1 DOE (2009d). “U.S. Department of Energy, Annual Energy Review 2008.” Independent Statistics and analysis, (Sep. 1, 2010).http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/contents.html Duke, R., and Kammen, D.M. (1999). “The Economics of Energy Market Transformation Programs.” Energy Journal., 20(4), 15-64. Farhar, B. C., Coburn, T. C., and Murphy, M. (2004). “Large-production home builder experience with zero energy homes.” Proc., Summer study on Energy Efficiency in buildings, ACEEE, Pacific Grove, Cal,8_ 9 – 8_109. Kibert, C.J. (1994). “Establishing principles and a model for sustainable construction.” Proc., of the First International Conference on Sustainable Construction, ed. C.J.Kibert. Tampa, FL., November 6-9. CIB TG-16. Mlecnik, E., Visscher, H., and Hal, A.V. (2010). “Barriers and opportunities for labels for highly energy-efficient houses.” J. Energy., 38(8), 4592-4603. Ofori, G., Briffett, C., Gang, G., and Ranasinghe, M. (2000). “Impact of ISO 14000 on construction enterprises in Singapore.” J. Construction Management and Economics., 18(8), 935-947. Parker, D. S. (2009). “Very low energy homes in the United States: Perspectives on performance from measured data.” J. Energy and Buildings., 41(5), 512-520. Pearce, A.R. (1999). “Sustainability and the Built Environment: A Metric and Process for Prioritizing Improvement Opportunities.” Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology., Atlanta, GA. Puttagunta, S., Aldrich, R. A., Owens, D. K., and Vijayakumar, G.(2006). “The Winding Road Towards “Zero” Energy:Lessons from Monitoring Efficient Solar Homes.” Proc. Summer study on Energy Efficiency in buildings, ACEEE, Pacific Grove, Cal,1_235 9 – 1_246. Schleich, J., and Gruber, E. (2008). “Beyond Case studies barriers to energy efficiency in commerce and the services sector.” J. Energy Economics., 30(2), 449-464. Shen, L. Y., and Tam, V. W. Y. (2002). “Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry.” International Journal of Project Management., 20(7), 535-543. Trahan, R. D. (2009). “Geothermal HVAC systems- a business case analysis for net zero plus.” M.S. thesis, Naval PostGraduate School., Monterey, Ca. Zhu, L., Hurt, R., Correa, D., and Boehm, R. (2009). “Comprehensive energy and economic analyses on a zero energy house versus a conventional house.” J. Energy., 34 (9)1043-1053. Identification of Literature Sustainability Innovation Construction Content Analysis Identifying barriers Identifying barrier breakers Identifying drivers Mapping Barriers with Barrier breaker Barriers with Drivers Gap Analysis Identify research gap Innovation Sustainability Construction Research Gap STEP 2 : Content Analysis IMPORTANCE OF STUDY The concept of ZEB needs to be developed within an integrated system approach, not simply as number of discrete, isolated concepts (Wall 1993; Feickert et al. 2009). Similar to the development of any technology, ZEB can be viewed from the prospective of innovation theory.. STEPS (Robson 2002) : 1.Start with a research question. 2.Decide on sampling strategy. 3.Define the recording unit. 4.Construct categories for analysis. 5.Carry out analysis PARAMETERS IDENTIFIED: 1.Barrier 2.Barrier Breaker 3.Parameter. - Snowball sampling. - Areas Searched: Environmental Management BACKGROUND Construction Market barrier Barriers Green building Barrier breakers Net zero energy home Diffusion of innovation Innovation in construction Net zero energy building Barriers in ZEB Barriers in Sustainable Construction Renewable energy Barriers in ZEH Conducted based on: Mapping (tables) To identify research gaps and opportunities. Parameters of each body of literature.. Mapping the attributes of the studies reviewed. In terms of parameters, which characterize ZEB projects.. No.Research TitleAuthor 1.Establishing principles and a model for sustainable constructionKibert 1994 2The Economics of Energy Market Transformation ProgramsDuke and Kammen 1999 3Impact of ISO 14000 on construction enterprises in SingaporeOfori et al. 2000 4Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry Shen and Tam 2002 5Large-Production Home Builder Experience with Zero Energy HomesFarhar et al. 2004 6Builders and Buyers Handbook for Improving New Home Efficiency, Comfort, and Durability in the Hot and Humid Climate. Baechler and Love 2004 7The Winding Road Towards “Zero” Energy:Lessons from Monitoring Efficient Solar Homes. Puttagunta et al. 2006 8The challenges of designing and building a net zero energy home in a cold high- latitude climate Brostrom and Howell 2008 9Improving the energy performance of UK households: Results from surveys of consumer adoption and use of low – and zero-carbon technologies. Caird et al. 2008 10Beyond Case studies barriers to energy efficiency in commerce and the services sector Schleich and Gruber 2008 11Very low energy homes in the United States: Perspectives on performance from measured data Parker 2009 12Geothermal HVAC Systems-a business case analysis for net zero plusTrahan 2009 13Barriers to Zero Energy Construction (ZEC) Technically possible; why not succeed yet? Abdalla et al. 2009 14Comprehensive energy and economic analyses on a zero energy house versus a conventional house Zhu et al. 2009 15Evaluation of the effectiveness of an energy efficiency program for new home construction in eastern North Carolina Dixon et al. 2010 16Barriers and opportunities for labels for highly energy-efficient housesMlecnik et al. 2010 STEP 2 : Content Analysis
Renewable Energy Workshop 2012 Global Market Impacts on Wind and PV Technologies A Presentation to the Bucknell University Renewable Energy Workshop –
LOGO Environmental Planning & Assessment Centre, Yonsei University Prof. Dr. Mu Choon Lee Sep EA master programs in Korea.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Environmental Management & Sustainability ALEX HETHERINGTON - Benefits Beyond Compliance Libstar Manufacturing Forum May Irene Country Club.
0 - 0.
1 April 2006 Collaborative Labeling and Appliance Standards Program (CLASP) The Rationale for Energy Efficiency Standards and Labels.
Arthur Berger Regional Products and Income Accounts, Beijing, China, March 2010 Canadas Provincial and Territorial Economic Accounts.
High Performance Buildings Past, Present and Future Chris Mattock
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
International Aviation and Climate Change: The ICAO Contribution
Ms Joyce Tam, Principal Assistant Secretary for Information Technology and Broadcasting Presentation on “Developing an E-Government” to IIAC Members Thursday.
Dave Chaffey, E-Business and E-Commerce Management, 4 th Edition, © Marketing Insights Limited 2009 Slide 1.1 Introduction to e-business and e-commerce.
1 Cohesion Policy support for Sustainable Energy Intelligent Energy Europe boosting regional competitiveness through sustainable energy Open Days Workshop.
Economic Radar of the Sustainable Energy Sector in the Netherlands, 2008 – 2011 Maarten van Rossum (Statistics Netherlands) Daan Zult Joram Vuik May 2014.
Target setting for the SEE 2020 strategy Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina September 11 th
1 Meeting carbon budgets – 5th Progress Report to Parliament Committee on Climate Change, June If you want to tweet about this report.
International Organization International Organization
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.