Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byElissa Thornberry Modified over 2 years ago

1
1 Coupling simulation of lung blood flow to pressure in the deforming lung tissue K.S. Burrowes 1,2 & M.H. Tawhai 2 1 Dept. of Physiology & Computing Laboratory, University of Oxford, U.K. 2 Bioengineering Inst- itute, The University of Auckland, New Zealand Vessel elasticity has a significant effect on the distribution of flow, with more elastic vessels leading to a more pronounced gradient of flow due to gravity, Fig 5. EVOLUTION: from symmetry to coupled mechanics-blood flow predictions Towards realistic predictions of pulmonary blood flow IUPS PHYSIOME PROJECT TLC FRC -2.8kPa -0.8kPa - 2.2kPa -0.3kPa Figure 6: Surface pressures (kPa) and tissue deformation simulated in the upright lung at 1G, TLC and FRC. The hashed white surface and blue lines are on the contact body; coloured surface and red lines are the deformable lung. Pressure fields computed from elastic deformation of the lung (P pl ) are coupled to the vascular pressure-radius relationship, Fig 8. The effect of gravity on flow solutions was investigated, Fig 4, illustrating a clear influence of gravity but a consistent overall flow distribution. Diameters are allocated using a Strahler-based diameter ratio. Smaller diameter ratios result in vessels with larger radii therefore increased flow and a larger gradient of flow with respect to gravity, Fig 3. Coupling the flow model with a model of soft-tissue mechanics brings us even closer to making realistic predictions of blood flow distributions and enables calculations of flow at different lung volumes and in different postures, Fig 10. Fig 10: (a) Terminal flows (30 mm slices) upright and inverted at TLC and FRC, height is cranio-caudal axis, and (b) prone and supine at TLC and FRC, height is dorso-ventral axis (0% at ventral surface). Fig 8: Dependence of flow on mechanics solution in FRC lung upright: with mechanics, without mechanics (inlet P pl =-5 cmH 2 O), with- out P pl, & without P pl or gravity. Height (%) refers to gravitationally-dependent height (i.e cranio-caudal axis). REFERENCES 1.Tawhai et al, (2004), J Appl Physiol, 97(6):2310-2321. 2.Burrowes et al, (2005), J Appl Physiol,99(2):731-738. 3.Burrowes et al, (2005), ‘Respir Physiol Neurobiol (in press). 4.Yen et al, (1980), J Biomech Eng 102: 170–177. 5.Krenz et al, (2003), Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284, H2192–H2203. 6.Fung, Y.C., (1975), Circ Res, 37: 481-496. The use of an anatomically-based model enables more realistic flow predictions to be obtained. Fig 2 compares flows in the anatomically-based versus a symmetric branching model, illustrating that flow heterogeneity results from the asymmetric vascular branching structure. Fig 1: Imaging-based model geometry. Spatially-consistent finite element models of lung, airway, and vascular trees derived from MDCT imaging in a single human subject. Assumptions of a symmetric vascular network will produce unrealistic homogeneous flow distributions. Fig 2: Flow solutions in anatomically- based (A) versus symmetric (S) model plotted with respect to height. We use a combination of medical imaging and a volume-filling branching algorithm to construct geometric models of the lung surface 1 and vascular trees 2, Fig 1. A reduced form of the Navier-Stokes equations and a pressure-radius relationship are solved within the vascular geometry to predict pressure, radius, and flow 3. Fig 4: Flow plotted with respect to height with various amounts of gravity averaged within 1 & 50 mm slices. Posture Slope (cmH 2 O/cm) Upright TLC0.220 (R 2 =0.93) Upright FRC0.174 (R 2 =0.94) Inverted TLC-0.224 (R 2 =0.91) Inverted FRC-0.164 (R 2 =0.91) Table 1: Slope of straight line fit to tissue pressures, as an estimate of P pl gradient. The deformable lung model is contained by a contact ‘pleural’ body that changes geometry from TLC to FRC. Contact is enforced between the lung and the pleural surfaces, but the lung is free to slide. TLC FRC Fig 7: Coupled mechanics-blood flow solution: Pressure distribution (kPa) at 1G within the upright left lung arterial model at TLC and FRC. The material is described using a strain-energy density function 6 with coefficients such that uniform inflation pressures are ~5cmH 2 O at FRC and ~25cmH 2 O at TLC. Lung volume changes are predicted using equations for finite deformation (large strain) theory, Fig 6, tissue pressure gradients are displayed in Table 1. The reference geometry is taken as a uniform scaling from TLC to 25% of TLC. Fig 5: Variation in vessel elasticity (G 0 ): Terminal flow values, averaged within 30 mm slices, plotted with respect to gravitationally-dependent height. G 0 normally set as 5 kPa, based on experimental data 4,5. This poster demonstrates steps towards producing a realistic model of blood flow in the lung. Blood flow results display a relatively large amount of flow heterogeneity in all regions of the lung and a consistent decrease in flow in the cranial and caudal regions highlighting the significance of the vascular branching structure on flow distribution. Coupling soft-tissue mechanics to blood flow increases understanding of the effect of lung tissue deformation on blood flow. Gravity has a more significant effect on tissue deformation at FRC than TLC, but a larger effect on blood flow at TLC than FRC due to greater distension of vessels. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by NIH grant R01-HL-064368, a Maurice Paykel Postdoctoral Fellowship and the Wellcome Trust in Oxford. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of colleagues at the University of Iowa, Auckland, & Oxford. Fig 9: Flow averaged within 1 and 30 mm slices with respect to gravitationally-dependent height. (a) Within FRC geometry with TLC and FRC P pl from mechanics solution. (b) FRC P pl distribution from mechanics solution within FRC and TLC geometries calculated via mechanics model. This study uses a model of the left human lung and arterial tree. The arterial model is embedded within the lung and deforms according to the change in lung volume, Fig 7. The effect of P pl and length changes on flow were assessed separately. Change in P pl with constant geometry resulted in a relat- ively linear increase in flow from FRC to TLC due to increased radius values, Fig 9a. The flow response to vascular length deformations was more heterogeneous with higher average flows at FRC, Fig 9b. Fig 10 compares inversion of postures: changes in lung volume produce a roughly linear reduction in flow from TLC to FRC. Results demonstrate alterations in flow gradients resulting from inversion of posture, however flow gradients are not completely reversed indicating a component of structural dependence. The model of coupled soft-tissue mechanics-blood flow has been used to investigate flow heterogeneity in response to gravity, orientation of the lung, and resultant tissue deformation. This poster details the evolution towards a realistic model of pulmonary blood flow. Factors not yet accounted for: Changes in the geometry of the chest wall, diaphragm, and heart with change in posture have not been included; Coefficients in the material law were based on a simple assumption of P pl(FRC) =-5cmH 2 O and P pl(TLC) =-25cmH 2 O; The effect of blood pressure was not included in the mechanics solutions; Vessel elasticity did not change with changing length which would tend to decrease the flow predictions at TLC. Why?What? 2 4 5 6 7 Fig 3: (a) Radius and (b) flow (30 mm slices)versus height with various Strahler-based diameter ratios. (a)(b) (a)(b) We constructed a computational model to understand the interdependence between structure, fluid transport, and mechanical function in the lung. The use of a model provides exact control over functional parameters and the geometry of the solution domain. MODEL GEOMETRY FLOW MODEL + GRAVITY VESSEL ELASTICITY SOFT-TISSUE MECHANICS VESSELS EMBEDDED COUPLED MECHANICS-FLOW FLOW IN VARIOUS POSTURES SUMMARY 3

Similar presentations

OK

1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.

1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google