Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Appendix Materials Figures A-2—A30. Figure A-2: Potential Focus Groups Cabinet Campus Technology Council Chancellor’s Cabinet 2 Chief Administrators Officers.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Appendix Materials Figures A-2—A30. Figure A-2: Potential Focus Groups Cabinet Campus Technology Council Chancellor’s Cabinet 2 Chief Administrators Officers."— Presentation transcript:

1 Appendix Materials Figures A-2—A30

2 Figure A-2: Potential Focus Groups Cabinet Campus Technology Council Chancellor’s Cabinet 2 Chief Administrators Officers Data Stewardship Council Council of Deans Lead Policy Analysts Group Student Systems 2012 IDMG Task Force and Advisory Group (Dec 12) Academic Senate(?) Campus Development Officers (?) Facilities Leaders (?) Project plan assumes we will conduct 5 to 10 focus groups

3 Figure A-3: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Existence of Data You Need As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq STAFF: Staff funding patterns 54% 630.0903 Office of Student Research Survey Databases 82% 170.0907 STAFF: Hiring policy/practice 54% 820.0373 Student Data Warehouse (Pilot) 82% 170.0907 STAFF: Staff benefits/welfare iss. 53% 590.0603 Payroll (PPS) 75% 610.0259 STAFF: Compensation 52% 860.0141 Berkeley Information Sys. (BIS) 72% 650.083 UGRAD: Enrollment/course load plan. 52% 560.0513 Facilities Database System (FDX) 48% 290.0813 STAFF: Staffing needs/FTE allocation 51% 860.0065 By Job Type Tot NChisq STAFF: Staff development (mentor.) 51% 830.0055 College/school-level administ. (e.g., Associate Dean) 100% 60.0586 STAFF: Staff satisfaction/climate 50% 740.0071 Policy analyst 95% 220.0011 UGRAD: GPA, Advancement, retention, and graduation 49% 450.0319 Systems programmer 82% 170.0907 FAC: Faculty satisfaction/climate 49% 370.0514 Institutional researcher/analyst 82% 220.0591 STAFF: Staff workload/product./eval. 48% 770.0015 Staff member who supports non- acad. department decision maker 73% 780.0343 STAFF: Staff succession policy/plan. 46% 610.0018 Campus-level decision maker 48% 290.0813 OTHPOP: Extension 43% 210.046 Non-academic depar. director 48% 290.0813 Other academic department directors (e.g., ORU Director) 29% 70.0552 Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10).

4 Figure A-4: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Established Procedures for Requesting Access to Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant diff. only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq FINANC: Funding patterns/trends 51% 680.0199 Berk. Integr. Budg. and Staff. Syst. (BIBS) 66% 500 FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 50% 1110.0023 Berkeley Information Sys. (BIS)52% 610.0188 FINANC: Budget proj./expend. anal. 50% 1200.0018 Travel & Entert. Reimbursem.49% 700.0716 FINANC: Budget/fin. pol./develop. 49% 740.0593 Human Res. Man. Sys. (HRMS)48% 1190.0132 UGRAD: GPA, Advan., retent., grad. 28% 400.0956 Berk. Financial System (BFS)47% 1240.0259 UGRAD: Enrollment/course plan. 27% 510.0532 Cal Profiles 46% 1060.0708 OTHPOP: Visitors/Affiliates 27% 370.0977 BAIRS46% 1630.0085 GRAD: Admission planning/policy 27% 410.0741 Student Information Systems27% 370.0977 UGRAD: Admission planning/policy 26% 350.0761 Off. of Stud. Research Datab.18% 170.058 UGRAD: Course content/dev./eval. 24% 330.0575 Financial Aid (SAMS)11% 90.0772 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. productivity 23% 260.0733 Course File (Academic Senate)0% 110.0063 UGRAD: Undergrad. learn. outcom. 22% 370.0174 By Job Type Tot NChisq FAC: Faculty support/mentoring21% 390.0092 Campus-level decision maker57% 280.0435 OTHPOP: Extension19% 210.047 Staff who supp. campus-level decis. maker 49% 630.0721 GRAD: Course content/dev./eval.18% 280.0139 Staff who supp. acad. depart. decision maker 27% 450.056

5 Figure A-5: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Willingness of Other Units to Grant Data Access As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq UGRAD: Student profiles 44% 430.0923 Admissions Database84% 190.0099 FAC: Hiring policy/practice 40% 300.0633 Berk. Integr. Budg. and Staff. Syst. (BIBS) 73% 510.0078 GRAD: Course content/dev./eval. 36% 250.0356 Campus Alumni Development System (CADS) 69% 390.0697 FAC: Faculty support/mentoring 33% 360.0034 Cal Profiles64% 1030.0336 COURSE: Course offerings/profiles 32% 220.0177 UG Admissions (UGA) (var. syst.)25% 80.0742 COURSE: Approv./modific. of courses 32% 190.027 Facil. and Spat. Data Integ. (FASDI) 24% 170.0055 OTHPOP: Extension 30% 200.0154 By Job Type Tot NChisq ACAD: Non-fac. acad. devel./mentor. 25% 160.0103 Staff who supp. acad. depart. decision maker44% 410.0937 Systems manager41% 270.095

6 Figure A-6: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Timeliness of Cross-Unit Response to Data Requests As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant diff. only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq SPACE: Parking/Transportat. Needs 73% 150.0398 Berk. Integr. Budg. and Staff. Syst. (BIBS) 80% 460 GRAD: Grad. st. placement upon grad. 71% 170.0496 Physical Plant (SPAN)73% 110.0882 FINANC: Costing st./rate develop. 64% 470.0136 Visiting Scholars/Postdocs (VSPA)71% 140.0664 STAFF: Compensation 61% 690.0097 Payroll (PPS)61% 560.0261 FINANC: Funding patterns/trends 61% 560.0261 Berk. Financial System (BFS)55% 1100.0284 FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 60% 950.0022 UG Admissions (UGA) (var. syst.) 13% 80.0433 SPACE: Facilities plan./dev./renov. 60% 470.0688 By Job Type Tot NChisq FINANC: Budget proj./expend. anal. 57% 1050.0105 Staff who supp. non-acad. depart. decis. maker 57% 650.0812 UGRAD: Enrollment/course load plan. 34% 470.0388 Systems manager27% 260.0257 COURSE: Course offerings/profiles 28% 180.0803 COURSE: Approv./modific. of courses 13% 150.0061

7 Figure A-7: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Release of Up-to-Date Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Sub-Decision (continued) Tot NChisq STAFF: Staff development/mentor. 42% 730.0493 FAC: Faculty satisfac./climate 27% 300.0029 STAFF: Staff succession pol./plan. 41% 580.0607 COURSE: Course offerings/profiles 25% 200.0112 UGRAD: Student profiles/characteris. 41% 440.0991 COURSE: Approv./mod. of courses 24% 170.0143 STAFF: Staff workld./product./eval. 41% 690.0241 GRAD: Course content/dev./eval. 21% 240.0012 UGRAD: GPA, Advan., retent., grad. 40% 400.0923 By Data Access Tot NChisq UGRAD: Undergrad. satisfact./climate 40% 450.071 Berk. Int. Budg. & Staff. Sys. (BIBS) 78% 510 STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 40% 630.0222 Payroll (PPS) 69% 580.004 FAC: Faculty Compensation 39% 380.0884 Cashiers Deposit System (CDS) 69% 350.0381 FAC: Fac. teach., resrch., work. 39% 380.0884 Travel & Entertain. Reimbursement 65% 650.0217 GRAD: Admission planning/policy 38% 390.0619 Berkeley Information Sys. (BIS) 62% 600.0972 FAC: Faculty renewal policy/plan. 36% 280.0639 Human Res. Manag. Sys. (HRMS) 61% 1160.0102 FAC: Hiring policy/practice 34% 320.0308 Berk. Financial System (BFS) 61% 1170.0147 UGRAD: Enrollment/course load plan. 34% 470.0059 Cal Profiles 59% 1020.0908 FAC: Faculty support/mentoring 31% 350.0081 BAIRS 57% 1520.0604 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. devel./mentor. 31% 160.0827 Course File (Academic Senate) 18% 110.0208 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. productivity 30% 230.0284 Library Systems 17% 60.0775 UGRAD: Admission planning/policy 30% 330.007 Univ. Relat. Warehouse (in devel.) 0% 60.0095 FAC: Faculty productivity 30% 270.013 By Job Type Tot NChisq RESRCH: Resear. compliance review 29% 210.0236 General analyst 65% 480.0589 RESRCH: Proposal activity and trends 29% 280.008 Coll./school-level lead. (e.g., Dean) 14% 70.0415

8 Figure A-8: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Availability of Data When You Need It As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq STAFF: Staffing needs/FTE allocat. 42% 760.0224 Off. of Stud. Research Surveys 91% 110.0098 STAFF: Staff benefits/welfare iss. 42% 550.0604 Admissions Database72% 180.088 STAFF: Staff workld./product./eval. 42% 670.0316 Graduate Stud. Informat. Sys.71% 210.0752 STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 41% 610.0306 Cal Profiles62% 970.0223 GRAD: Financial aid/fellowship supp. 40% 470.0557 By Job Type FAC: Faculty Compensation 40% 350.0976 No significant differences STAFF: Staff funding patterns 40% 550.0288 STAFF: Compensation 38% 740.0018 STAFF: Hiring policy/practice 37% 680.0016 STAFF: Staff development/mentor. 34% 700.0002 FAC: Faculty support/mentoring 33% 330.0152 RESRCH: Research compliance review 32% 190.0522 STAFF: Staff succession pol./plan. 31% 520.0003 GRAD: Course content/dev./evaluat.30% 200.032 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. devel./mentor.29% 170.044

9 Figure A-9: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Ease of Extracting/Accessing Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Sub-Decision (continued) Tot NChisq FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 55% 990.0193 OTHPOP: Extension21% 190.0276 STAFF: Staff workld./product./eval. 34% 700.0312 ALUM: Giving profiles20% 200.0182 STAFF: Staff succession pol./plan. 34% 500.0752 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. devel./ment.18% 170.018 STAFF: Staff benefits/welfare iss. 33% 540.048 ALUM: Biographical profiles17% 180.0115 UGRAD: Student profiles/characteris. 32% 380.0667 GRAD: Course content/dev./evalu.15% 200.0047 SPACE: Space allocation 31% 480.0309 COURSE: Course offerings/profiles14% 220.0018 UGRAD: Course content/dev./evaluat. 30% 270.0847 ALUM: Relationships & affiliations14% 220.0018 FAC: Faculty funding patterns 30% 270.0847 ALUM: Volunteer history8% 120.0085 STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 29% 660.0019 By Data Access Tot NChisq UGRAD: Enrollment/course load plan. 28% 430.0124 Berk. Integ. Bud. & Staff. Sy. (BIBS)62% 500.0084 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. satisf./clim. 27% 220.0764 Berkeley Information Sys. (BIS)61% 640.0039 RESRCH: Research compliance review 27% 220.0764 Campus Alumni Developmen System (CADS) 32% 370.0905 FAC: Faculty support/mentoring 27% 300.0296 BearFacts31% 510.0264 ALUM: Prospect. donor activ./wealth 26% 230.0529 Student Information Systems28% 320.0376 ACAD: Teaching, research, workload 23% 220.0265 By Job Type Tot NChisq ACAD: Non-fac. acad. productivity 23% 220.0265 Staff who supp. campus-level decis. maker 62% 630.0024 COURSE: Approv./modific. of courses 22% 180.0418

10 Figure A-10: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Clear Documentation Regarding Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq SPACE: Library facilit./hold./plan. 56% 90.0835 Physical Plant (SPAN)60% 150.0081 OTHPOP: Visitors/Affiliates 47% 380.0098 Berk. Integr. Bud. and Staff. Sy. (BIBS)46% 480.0067 FINANC: Budget/fin. pol./develop. 41% 660.0208 Berk. Financial System (BFS)38% 1150.0071 FINANC: Budget proj./exp. anal. 40% 1100.0018 BAIRS35% 1540.0225 FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 40% 1010.0053 BearFacts14% 510.0055 STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 20% 650.0494 Collect./Accounts Rec. Sy. (CARS) 14% 220.0857 UGRAD: Enrollm./course load pln. 20% 460.099 Class Sched. & Instruct. Rec. (CSIR)11% 280.0202 GRAD: Admission planning/policy 17% 350.0817 Graduate Stud. Information Syst.10% 210.0352 GRAD: Course content/dev./eval. 9% 220.0274 Student Data Warehouse (Pilot)7% 150.0447 Student Information Systems6% 330.0015 By Job Type Tot NChisq Staff who supp. coll./sch.-level decis. maker 41% 440.0734

11 Figure A-11: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Accuracy/Quality of the Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq ACAD: Non-fac. acad. productivity 52% 230.0871 Cashiers Deposit System (CDS)86% 360.0124 FAC: Faculty FTE allocation 50% 260.0375 Berk. Integ. Bud. and Staff. Sy. (BIBS)80% 500.0442 FAC: Faculty funding patterns 50% 260.0375 Payroll (PPS)79% 580.0374 RESRCH: Proposal activity and trends 50% 280.0301 Archit. CAD floor plans/rm. numb.33% 60.0649 FAC: Faculty satisfac./climate 48% 290.0154 Univ. Relat. Warehouse (in develop.)33% 60.0649 RESRCH: Contracts/grants policy 47% 320.0061 Facil. and Spat. Data Integ. (FASDI) 33% 150.003 RESRCH: Research compliance review 45% 220.0175 By Job Type FAC: Faculty support/mentoring 44% 320.0016 No significant differences ALUM: Volunteer history 43% 140.0376 RESRCH: Technology licensing activity 33% 90.023

12 Figure A-12: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Consistency of Data Across the Campus As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq ALUM: Relationships & affiliations 25% 280.0895 Berk. Integ. Bud. and Staff. Sy. (BIBS)53% 360.0765 ALUM: Biographical profiles 22% 230.0633 Cal Profiles49% 840.0267 ALUM: Giving profiles 19% 210.0423 Off. of Stud. Research Surveys15% 130.0652 Student Data Warehouse (Pilot)9% 110.0335 Facil. and Spat. Data Integ. (FASDI)8% 120.0225 Univ. Relat. Warehouse (in devel.) 0% 50.0668 By Job Type Tot NChisq Data recorder73% 110.0211 Staff who supp. acad. depart. decision maker 61% 310.0076 Staff who supp. other acad. depart. decis. mak. 61% 230.0274

13 Figure A-13: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Consistency of Data Fields Across Systems As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 16% 440.0619 BearFacts15% 410.0464 FAC: Faculty FTE allocation 11% 190.0907 Class Sched. & Instruct. Rec. (CSIR) 5% 220.0121 FAC: Faculty satisfac./climate 10% 210.0576 Course File (Academic Senate)0% 90.0626 OTHPOP: Extension 0% 160.0113 Facil. and Spat. Data Integ. (FASDI)0% 100.0491 By Job Type Tot NChisq Systems manager12% 250.0723 Policy analyst6% 160.0521

14 Figure A-14: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Access to Standardized Data Reports As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Sub-Decision (continued) Tot NChisq OTHPOP: Outreach 67% 180.0522 UGRAD: GPA, Advan., retent., & grad.22% 360.0033 SPACE: Eval. of client services 63% 190.0932 UGRAD: Advising21% 280.0084 RESRCH: Contracts/grants policy 62% 290.046 GRAD: Student profiles/characteris.18% 380.0004 RESRCH: Proposal activi. & trends 62% 260.069 By Data Access Tot NChisq FINANC: Budget proj./expen. anal. 55% 1070.0042 Library Systems83% 60.0544 FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 54% 990.0235 Physical Plant (SPAN)67% 150.0783 STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 36% 640.0994 Berk. Integ. Bud. & Staff. Syst. (BIBS)64% 470.0035 GRAD: Financ. aid/fellowsh. sup. 33% 460.0663 Cashiers Deposit System (CDS)63% 350.0201 FAC: Faculty satisfac./climate 31% 320.0996 Berkeley Information Sys. (BIS)59% 580.0153 GRAD: Grad. stud. satisf./climate 28% 390.0235 Berk. Equipm. Track. Syst. (BETS)58% 360.0764 UGRAD: Undergrd. learn. outcom. 28% 320.0426 Travel & Entertainment Reimbursem.58% 640.0148 FAC: Faculty productivity 27% 220.084 Berk. Financial System (BFS)55% 1160.002 UGRAD: Undergrad. satisfac./clim. 26% 460.0048 BAIRS50% 1490.0302 GRAD: Advan., retent., graduation 26% 270.0371 Student Information Systems30% 270.094 COURSE: Course offerings/profile 25% 200.0638 BearFacts29% 450.018 GRAD: Admission planning/policy 25% 320.016 Graduate Stud. Information Syst.27% 220.084 UGRAD: Admission planning/pol. 24% 330.0109 Class Sched. & Instruct. Rec. (CSIR)24% 210.0436 UGRAD: Enrollm./course ld. plan.24% 460.0016 Course File (Academic Senate)9% 110.015 UGRAD: Student profiles/characte.24% 420.0027 By Job Type Staff who supp. campus-level decis. maker 54% 630.0887

15 Figure A-15: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Access to Specialized Reports As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq FINANC: Budget proj./expend. anal. 40% 960.0398 Physical Plant (SPAN)54% 130.0859 FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 38% 910.0966 Berk. Financial System (BFS)40% 1010.0308 UGRAD: Undergrad. satisfact./climate 17% 410.0209 Cal Profiles26% 860.0882 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. productivity 17% 240.0832 BearFacts20% 410.0526 FAC: Fac. teach., resrch., work. 17% 300.0491 Facilities Database Syst. (FDX)16% 250.0645 UGRAD: Student profiles/characteris. 16% 380.0168 Student Information Systems 12% 250.0212 UGRAD: Enrollment/course load plan. 15% 400.0097 Class Schd. & Instr. Rec. (CSIR)9% 220.0142 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. advan./retent. 15% 270.0383 Univ. Relat. Warehouse (in dev.)0% 60.0865 UGRAD: Undergraduate learning outcom. 14% 280.0293 Course File (Academic Senate)0% 110.0188 UGRAD: Advising 13% 230.0371 By Job Type Tot NChisq UGRAD: Admission planning/policy 10% 310.0037 Staff who supp. campus-level decis. maker 44% 570.0291 FAC: Faculty productivity 9% 220.0142 UGRAD: GPA, Advan., retent., and grad. 9% 330.002 UGRAD: Undergr. placem. upon grad.8% 120.0681

16 Figure A-16: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Access to Trained Staff As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 33% 600.0806 Cal Profiles50% 940.0819 OTHPOP: Extension 20% 150.0629 Facilities Database System (FDX)20% 250.0141 RESRCH: Technology licensing activity 13% 80.0761 By Job Type Tot NChisq Member of the Chancellor's Cabinet 64% 140.0981

17 Figure A-17: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Access to User Friendly Reporting Tools As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq SPACE: Eval. of client services 50% 180.0724 Berk. Integr. Budg. & Staff. Syst. (BIBS) 45% 440.023 FINANC: Budget proj./exp. anal. 40% 1010.0147 Berkeley Information Sys. (BIS) 45% 560.0124 FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 38% 920.0665 BearFacts 19% 420.0608 UGRAD: Undergrad. satisf./clim. 18% 400.0401 Academic Personnel Data 14% 210.0798 FAC: Faculty support/mentoring 17% 290.0833 Facilities Database System (FDX) 12% 250.0284 UGRAD: Enrollm./course ld. plan. 17% 410.0317 By Job Type Tot NChisq UGRAD: GPA, Advan., retent., grad. 16% 320.0408 Institutional researcher/analyst 56% 180.02 OTHPOP: Extension 7% 150.0341 Policy analyst 48% 210.0878 RESRCH: Technology licensing activity 0% 80.0527 Staff who supp. coll./sch.-level decis. maker 46% 390.0267 Staff who supp. campus-level decis. maker 45% 600.0072 Campus-level decision maker 14% 210.0798

18 Figure A-18: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Access to Analytical Tools to Help with Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq FINANC: Budget develop./allocat. 18% 680.0793 Off. of Stud. Research Surveys 64% 140.0003 STAFF: Staff funding patterns 14% 360.0892 Off. of Stud. Research Databases 57% 140.0033 FINANC: Costing st./rate develop. 14% 360.0892 Student Data Warehouse (Pilot) 45% 110.0986 STAFF: Staff workld./product./evl. 13% 460.0311 Berk. Financial System (BFS) 19% 840.0875 SPACE: Space allocation 13% 320.0749 Travel & Entertainment Reimbursement 16% 450.0957 STAFF: Staff benefits/welfare iss. 11% 360.0327 BearFacts9% 320.0253 ALUM: Biographical profiles 6% 160.0718 Facilities Database System (FDX) 5% 210.0234 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. productiv. 6% 180.0461 Berk. Equipm. Track. Syst. (BETS) 4% 250.0092 ACAD: Non-fac. acad. satisf./clim. 6% 180.0461 By Job Type Tot NChisq Institutional researcher/analyst 72% 180 Systems programmer 60% 100.0076 Policy analyst 50% 160.0136 Staff who supp. non-acad. depart. decis. maker 35% 400.0829 Campus-level decision maker 6% 160.0718

19 Figure A-19: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Procedures to Protect Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq ALUM: Giving profiles 89% 190.0224 Financial Aid (SAMS)90% 100.0969 UGRAD: Advising 85% 340.0091 Student Information Systems81% 320.0453 ALUM: Biographical profiles 85% 200.0563 Human Resource Manag. Sys. (HRMS) 59% 980.0852 ALUM: Prospect. donor activ./wealth 85% 260.0306 Travel & Entertainment Reimbursement 54% 630.0244 GRAD: Advan., retent., graduation 81% 270.0651 Cashiers Deposit System (CDS)52% 330.0676 GRAD: Grad. stud. satisf./climate 78% 360.0951 Berk. Equipm. Track. Syst. (BETS) 51% 350.057 STAFF: Hiring policy/practice 57% 670.0732 Facil. and Spat. Data Integ. (FASDI)42% 120.0738 STAFF: Staff satisfact./climate 55% 640.0328 By Job Type Tot NChisq STAFF: Staff workld./product./eval. 55% 660.0273 Policy analyst47% 190.082 STAFF: Compensation 54% 720.0152 SPACE: Eval. of client services 48% 210.0701

20 Figure A-20: Mapping the UCB Data Landscape: % Evaluating Procedures to Ensure Sharing of Data As Excellent/Good vs. Fair/Poor (significant differences only, p<.10) Red Shading=Significantly lower eval. based on chi-sq. (p<.05; light red=p<.10). Green Shading=Sign. higher eval. based on chi-square (p<.05; light green=p<.10). By Sub-Decision Types Tot NChisq By Data Access Tot NChisq ALUM: Giving profiles 79% 140.0198 Admissions Database74% 190.0212 SPACE: Library facilit./hold./plan. 78% 90.0725 Travel & Entertainment Reimbursement 38% 500.0864 ALUM: Prospect. donor activ./wealth 75% 200.0126 Student Data Warehouse (Pilot)23% 130.0577 SPACE: Eval. of client services 71% 140.0757 Facil. and Spat. Data Integ. (FASDI) 18% 110.0384 UGRAD: Financial aid/fellowship supp. 68% 220.0509 By Job Type Tot NChisq RESRCH: Proposal activity and trends 68% 220.0509 College/school-level leader (e.g., Dean) 100% 50.0197 Campus-level decision maker21% 190.0119 Member of the Chancellor's Cabinet 11% 90.0216

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29 Figure A-29: Principal Component Analysis, Factor Analysis*: Access to Campus- Wide Data Systems among All IDMG Respondents (factors 1- 5) Factor 1 Factor 3 BAIRS 0.73 Admissions Database0.55 Berkeley Information Sys. (BIS)0.61 BearFacts0.58 Human Resource Management Sys. (HRMS)0.63 Departmental Student Award Sys.0.55 Berkeley Equipment & Tracking Sys. (BETS)0.53 Graduate Student Information Sys.0.74 Berkeley Financial Sys. (BFS)0.82Collection and Accounts Receivable Sys. (CARS)0.55 Berkeley Integ. Budget and Staff. Sys. (BIBS)0.71 Variance Explained: 2.49 Cashiers Deposit Sys. (CDS)0.63 Payroll (PPS)0.64Factor 4 Travel & Entertainment Reimbursement0.71Project Information Sys. Management (PRISM)0.87 Variance Explained: 4.79 Architectural CAD floor plans & room numbers0.89 Variance Explained: 1.96 Factor 2 Student Athletes (various Sys.)0.51Factor 5 Office of Student Research Database Sys.0.79Physical Plant (SPAN)0.58 Office of Student Res. Survey Databases0.87Facilities and Spatial Data Integration (FASDI)0.54 Student Data Warehouse (Pilot)0.75Facilities Database Sys. (FDX)0.55 Variance Explained: 2.51 Educational Technology Room Inventory0.59 Variance Explained: 1.67 *Using varimax rotation, Eigen value criterion for retention of factors, and displaying correlation values over.50 only.

30 Figure A-30: Principal Component Analysis, Factor Analysis*: Access to Campus- Wide Data Systems among All IDMG Respondents (factors 6-13) *Using varimax rotation, Eigen value criterion for retention of factors, and displaying correlation values over.50 only. Factor 6Factor 10 Class Schedule and Instruct. Rec. (CSIR)0.66Financial Aid (SAMS)0.63 Course File (Academic Senate)0.77UG Admissions (UGA) (var. sub sys.)0.81 Variance Explained: 1.60Variance Explained: 1.49 Factor 7Factor 11 Cal Profiles0.54Campus Alumni Develop. Sys. (CADS)0.75 Planning and Analysis Databases0.64University Relations Warehouse (in devel.)0.72 Variance Explained: 1.57 Variance Explained: 1.39 Factor 8Factor 12 Academic Personnel Data0.80UNEX Student Sys.0.80 Visiting Scholars and Post Doct. Aff. (VSPA)0.60 Variance Explained: 1.39 Variance Explained: 1.54 Factor 13 Factor 9Library Sys.0.86 Extramural Funds Accounting (EFA)0.76 Variance Explained: 1.32 COEUS0.60 33 Variance Explained: 1.53


Download ppt "Appendix Materials Figures A-2—A30. Figure A-2: Potential Focus Groups Cabinet Campus Technology Council Chancellor’s Cabinet 2 Chief Administrators Officers."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google