Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NOT SO FAST! Why We Must “KILL THE BILL” Boulder Valley Education Association.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NOT SO FAST! Why We Must “KILL THE BILL” Boulder Valley Education Association."— Presentation transcript:

1 NOT SO FAST! Why We Must “KILL THE BILL” Boulder Valley Education Association

2 NOT SO FAST! Senator Michael Johnston’s (D-Denver) educator bill, SB 191, otherwise known as the EQUITEE bill requires all teachers (probationary and non-probationary) and all principals to be evaluated every year. Evaluations conducted every two or three years would no longer be the standard. SB 191changes the purposes of evaluations to include supporting the state in the “equitable distribution of effective teachers and principals” (though it does not say how this distribution would occur). SB 191says that evaluation will be the basis for decision making in hiring, compensation, promotion, assignment, professional development, earning and keeping probationary status, dismissal, and contract nonrenewal.

3 NOT SO FAST! SB 191 bases teacher evaluations on “effectiveness.” The term is not defined. It also requires that principals evaluate teachers with “multiple methods that are fair, transparent, timely, and rigorous.” Those terms are not defined, nor are the methods. SB 191 also allows principals to designate others to do teacher evaluations, perhaps opening the door to peer reviewers who would have the authority to recommend dismissal of a teacher.

4 NOT SO FAST! SB 191 requires that at least 50 percent of a teacher’s evaluation be based on student academic growth. The multiple measures already mentioned will be used to determine a teacher’s “effectiveness” and shall include (but are not limited to) measures of student longitudinal academic growth and achievement levels on any statewide assessments in the relevant subject and grade level (i.e., CSAP). Locally adopted interim assessments approved by the State Board of Education to assess student academic growth in the relevant subject and grade level (in other words, tests that districts develop and that must be approved by the State Board) could also be used. This requirement appears to apply to every teacher even if he/she teaches in a subject or at a grade level where CSAP is not given.

5 NOT SO FAST! SB 191 defines a probationary teacher as one who has not yet completed three consecutive years of “demonstrated effectiveness.” Under SB 191, teachers win and lose non-probationary status. A non- probationary teacher loses due process with two consecutive years of “demonstrated ineffectiveness.” Then this teacher must build three new consecutive years of “demonstrated effectiveness” in order to win back non-probationary status. Presumably, one proceeds through one’s teaching career like this. A non-probationary teacher who loses their status would be subject to non-renewal regardless of their years of non-probationary status or employment in the district.

6 NOT SO FAST! SB 191 requires school boards to develop and implement new evaluation systems based on “effectiveness.” District systems must meet or exceed the state’s measures of “effectiveness.” District systems must provide that all teachers and principals are evaluated annually, and the systems must serve as the basis for “ineffective performance dismissal” (a new term that would be in the state due process law). The systems must also provide that any teacher whose performance is deemed “ineffective” be given a remediation plan. SB 191 says these teachers will get two things besides a remediation plan - a reasonable period of time to remediate deficiencies and a “statement of the resources and assistance available for the purpose of improving effectiveness.

7 NOT SO FAST! RIF (reduction in force) is changed under SB 191. The bill requires using “teacher ineffectiveness” to determine RIFs. The law would no longer state that probationary teacher contracts are cancelled first in a RIF. SB 191 provides that no teacher can be hired or transferred into a school without the “school’s” consent. This would supersede current CBA (collective bargaining agreement) provisions and current board policy. If a teacher cannot get an assignment after two hiring cycles – because he or she cannot get the consent of a receiving school – the teacher goes on unpaid leave.

8 NOT SO FAST! School boards must also adapt their principal evaluations so that at least 66% of a principal’s evaluation is based on a combination of student academic growth and the effectiveness or increased effectiveness of the teachers who work in the principal’s school.

9 NOT SO FAST! SB 191 does not codify the Governor’s Educator Effectiveness Council, but it gives the council more jobs. It also makes the council work closely with the State Board of Education and allows the State Board to take over the council’s work if that work is not completed by December 31, Instead of the Governor’s Educator Effectiveness Council making recommendations to the Legislature, the council will make recommendations to the State Board. Three State Board seats are up for election in November 2010: Angelika Schroeder (up for re-election, former BVSD school board member) and the seats held by Peggy Littleton and Randy DeHoff who are not running. All seven of the State Board of Education members, including Angelika Schroeder and Jane Goff (former CEA Vice President) took a motion of support for this bill.

10 NOT SO FAST! If you didn’t already think teaching is a risky job this bill should convince you that it is. This bill would touch every single one of us – no matter your level of experience in the district. You, your best friend, or your colleagues down the hall could lose your jobs if Sen. Michael Johnston passes this anti-teacher, anti-union bill. Evaluations will be used to hire, fire, pay, assign, and dismiss teachers in ways that you cannot even imagine today. We must marshal our forces and get our members mobilized right now. With your help…… WE WILL KILL THIS BILL!

11 Here’s how YOU must work to kill this bill - To be successful in fighting SB 191, Senator Johnston’s teacher evaluation and due process bill, we need educator voices in the capitol talking with their legislators. CEA is launching Rolling Lobby Days to ensure a continuous stream of educators voicing our message. BV and Westminster EA have chosen April 20 th as our united day. However, if that date doesn’t work – here are other days: April 19, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29. Please contact BVEA if you are willing to go down on these days. There are still BVEA professional leave days available if a group goes downtown. It was stated the legislators are really enjoying the conversations they have had with teachers so far at the Capitol. They want to hear from educators in the schools!!


Download ppt "NOT SO FAST! Why We Must “KILL THE BILL” Boulder Valley Education Association."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google