Download presentation

Published byArlene Williard Modified over 3 years ago

1
**Chapter 20: Basic principles of intersection signalization**

Chapter objectives: By the end of this chapter the student will be able to: Explain the meanings of the terms related to signalized intersections Explain the relationship among discharge headway, saturation flow, lost times, and capacity Explain the “critical lane” and “time budget” concepts Model left-turn vehicles in signal timing State the definitions of various delays taking place at signalized intersections Graph the relation between delay, waiting time, and queue length Explain three delay scenarios (uniform) Explain the components of Webster’s delay model and use it to estimate delay Explain the concept behind the modeling of random and overflow delay Know inconsistencies existing between stochastic and overflow delay models Chapter 20

2
**Discharge headways, saturation flow rates, and lost times **

Four critical aspects of signalized intersection operation discussed in this chapter Discharge headways, saturation flow rates, and lost times Allocation of time and the critical lane concept The concept of left-turn equivalency Delay as a measure of service quality Chapter 20

3
**20.1.1 Components of a Signal Cycle**

Cycle length Phase Interval Change interval All-red interval (clearance interval) Controller Chapter 20

4
**Signal timing with a pedestrian signal: Example**

Interval Pine St. Oak St. % Veh. Ped. 1 G-26 W-20 R-31 DW-31 36.4 2 FDW-6 10.9 3 Y-3.5 DW-29 6.4 4 R-25.5 AR 2.7 5 G-19 W-8 14.5 6 FDW-11 20.0 7 Y-3 DW-5 5.5 8 R-2 AR 3.6 Cycle length = 55 seconds Chapter 20

5
**20. 1. 2 Signal operation modes and left-turn treatments & 20. 1**

Signal operation modes and left-turn treatments & Left-turn treatments Operation modes: Pretimed (fixed) operation Semi-actuated operation Full-actuated operation Master controller, computer control, adaptive traffic control systems for coordinated systems Left-turn treatments: Permitted left turns Protected left turns Protected/permitted (compound) or permitted/protected left turns Chapter 20

6
**Factors affecting the permitted LT movement**

LT flow rate Opposing flow rate Number of opposing lanes Whether LTs flow from an exclusive LT lane or from a shared lane Details of the signal timing Chapter 20

7
**CFI (Continuous Flow Intersection)**

Bangerter Highway & 3500 South Chapter 20

8
**DDI (Diverging Diamond Interchange)**

Chapter 20

9
**Four basic mechanisms for building an analytic model or description of a signalized intersection**

Discharge headways at a signalized intersection The “critical lane” and “time budget” concepts The effects of LT vehicles Delay and other MOEs (like queue size and the number of stops) Chapter 20

10
**20.2 Discharge headways, saturation flow, lost times, and capacity**

Start-up lost time Effective green h Vehicles in queue Total lost time Saturation flow rate Clearance lost time e Startup lost time Extension of green Gi Capacity yi ari Cycle length Chapter 20

11
**Sample problem, p. 467 First approach: Second approach: Eq. 20-6**

Chapter 20

12
**20.2.6 Saturation flow rates from a nationwide survey**

Chapter 20

13
**20.3 The “critical lane” and “time budget” concepts**

Each phase has one and only one critical lane (the most intense traffic demand). If you have a 2-phase signal, then you have two critical lanes. 345 Total loss in one hour Total effective green in one hour 100 75 Max. sum of critical traffic demand; this is the total demand that the intersection can handle. 450 N = No. of phases; tL = Lost time in seconds per phase; C = Cycle length, sec; h = saturation headway, sec/veh Chapter 20

14
**20.3.2 Finding an Appropriate Cycle Length**

Desirable cycle length, incorporating PHF and the desired level of v/c Eq Eq Doesn’t this look like the Webster model? The benefit of longer cycle length tapers around 90 to 100 seconds. This is one reason why shorter cycle lengths are better. N = # of phases. Larger N, more lost time, lower Vc. Chapter 20

15
**Webster’s optimal cycle length model**

C0 = optimal cycle length for minimum delay, sec L = Total lost time per cycle, sec Sum (v/s)i = Sum of v/s ratios for critical lanes Delay is not so sensitive for a certain range of cycle length This is the reason why we can round up the cycle length to, say, a multiple of 5 seconds. Chapter 20

16
**20.3.2 Finding an Appropriate Cycle Length**

Desirable cycle length, Cdes Marginal gain in Vc decreases as the cycle length increases. Cycle length 100% increase Vc 8% increase (Review the sample problem on page 473) Fig. 20.4 Chapter 20

17
A sample problem, p.473 Chapter 20

18
**20.4 The Concept of Left-Turn (and Right-Turn) Equivalency**

In the same amount of time, the left lane discharges 5 through vehicles and 2 left-turning vehicles, while the right lane discharges 11 through vehicles. Chapter 20

19
**Left-turn vehicles are affected by opposing vehicles and number of opposing lanes.**

5 1000 1500 The LT equivalent increases as the opposing flow increases. For any given opposing flow, however, the equivalent decreases as the number of opposing lanes is increased. Chapter 20

20
**Left-turn consideration: 2 methods**

Given conditions: 2-lane approach Permitted LT 10% LT, TVE (ELT) =5 h = 2 sec for through Solution 1: Each LT consumes 5 times more effective green time. Solution 2: Calibrate a factor that would multiply the saturation flow rate for through vehicles to produce the actual saturation flow rate. Chapter 20

21
**20.5 Delay as an MOE Common MOEs: Delay Queuing**

Stopped time delay: The time a vehicle is stopped while waiting to pass through the intersection Approach delay: Includes stopped time, time lost for acceleration and deceleration from/to a stop Travel time delay: the difference between the driver’s desired total time to traverse the intersection and the actual time required to traverse it. Time-in-queue delay: the total time from a vehicle joining an intersection queue to its discharge across the stop-line or curb-line. Control delay: time-in-queue delay + acceleration/deceleration delay) Common MOEs: Delay Queuing No. of stops (or percent stops) Chapter 20

22
**20.5.2 Basic theoretical models of delay**

Uniform arrival rate assumed, v Here we assume queued vehicles are completely released during the green. Note that W(i) is approach delay in this model. At saturation flow rate, s The area of the triangle is the aggregate delay. Figure 20.10 Chapter 20

23
**Three delay scenarios This is acceptable. This is great.**

UD = uniform delay OD = overflow delay due to prolonged demand > supply (Overall v/c > 1.0) OD = overflow delay due to randomness (“random delay”). Overall v/c < 1.0 A(t) = arrival function D(t) = discharge function If this is the case, we have to do something about this signal. Chapter 20

24
**Arrival patterns compared**

Isolated intersections Signalized arterials HCM uses the Arrival Type factor to adjust the delay computed as an isolated intersection to reflect the platoon effect on delay. Chapter 20

25
**Webster’s uniform delay model, p480**

UDa Total approach delay The area of the triangle is the aggregated delay, “Uniform Delay (UD)”. To get average approach delay/vehicle, divide this by vC Chapter 20

26
**Modeling for random delay, p.481**

UD = uniform delay Analytical model for random delay Adjustment term for overestimation (between 5% and 15%) OD = overflow delay due to randomness (in reality “random delay”). Overall v/c < 1.0 D = 0.90[UD + RD] Chapter 20

27
**Random delay derivation**

Chapter 20. Chapter 20

28
**Modeling overflow delay**

because c = s (g/C), divide both sides by v and you get (g/C)(v/c) = (v/s). And v/c = 1.0. The aggregate overflow delay is: Because the total vehicle discharged during T is cT, See the right column of p.482 for the characteristics of this model. Chapter 20

29
**Average overflow delay between T1 and T2**

Average delay/vehicle = (Area of trapezoid)/(No. vehicles within T2-T1). Derive it by yourself. Hint: the denominator is c(T2-T1). Chapter 20

30
**20.5.3 Inconsistencies in random and overflow delay**

The stochastic model’s overflow delay is asymptotic to v/c = 1.0 and the overflow model’s delay is 0 at v/c =1.0. The real overflow delay is somewhere between these two models. Chapter 20

31
**Comparison of various overflow delay model**

Delay model in the HCM 2000 The 4th edition dropped the HCM 2000 model (I don’t know why…). It looks like Akcelik’s model that you see in p. 484 (eq ). These models try to address delays for 0.85<v/c<1.15 cases. Chapter 20

32
**20.5.5 Sample delay computations**

We will walk through sample problems (pages ). This will review all delay models we studied in this chapter. Start reading Synchro 9.0 User Manual and SimTraffic 9.0 User Manual. We will use these software programs starting Mon, October 20, 2014. Chapter 20

Similar presentations

OK

CEE 320 Fall 2008 Course Logistics HW7 due today (9 total) Midterm next Friday (Wednesday review) Signalized Intersections (Chapter 7 of text) Last material.

CEE 320 Fall 2008 Course Logistics HW7 due today (9 total) Midterm next Friday (Wednesday review) Signalized Intersections (Chapter 7 of text) Last material.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Upload and view ppt online training Ppt on power quality and energy management Ppt on neutral grounding Ppt on transport in flowering plants Full ppt on electron beam machining process Ppt on conceptual art examples Animal adaptations for kids ppt on batteries Ppt on rural entrepreneurship Ppt on distributed file system Ppt on p&g products