Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAlysa Ballance Modified over 2 years ago

1
Salvatore Ruggieri SIGKDD2010 Frequent Regular Itemset Mining 2010/9/2 1

2
Outline 2010/9/2 2 Motivation Problem Definition Mining Regular Itemsets Experimental Results Conclusions

3
Motivation 2010/9/2 3 The intended objective of concise representations, like as closed itemset, is to alleviate the problems due to extracting, storing and postprocessing a huge amount of frequent patterns. They sacrifice readability and direct interpretability by a data analyst in favor of a compact, lossless representation, where itemsets whose support is derivable from others are pruned away.

4
(Cont.) 2010/9/2 4 min_sup=2 15 frequent itemsets a: 3 b: 3 c: 3 d: 2 ab: 2 bc: 2 ac: 3 bd: 2 ad: 2 cd: 2 abc: 2 abd: 2 acd: 2 bcd: 2 abcd: 2 3 closed itemset

5
Problem Definition 2010/9/2 5 This paper propose an extension of itemsets, called regular, with an immediate semantics and interpretability.

6
Extended itemsets 2010/9/2 6 E::=a|a?| {a 1,…,a h } * | {a 1,…,a k } + a?: means an item a may or may not be present. {a 1,…,a h } * : means any subset of an itemset may be present. {a 1,…,a k } + : means any non-empty subset of an itemset may be present. Example: The extended itemset ab{cd} * is represented the set of itemsets {ab, abc, abd, abcd} The extended itemset ab?{cd} + is represented the set of itemsets {ac, ad, acd, abc, abd, abcd}

7
(Cont.) 2010/9/2 7 The semantics s e ( ) for extended items is defined as follows:

8
(Cont.) 2010/9/2 8 The notion of extended itemset does not take into account the cover nor the support of the itemsets in tis semantics. Example The extended itemset R =ab? Two itemsets belong to s(R), namely a and ab. However, ab a

9
Regular Itemsets 2010/9/2 9

10
Mining Regular Itemsets 2010/9/2 10 A non-compositional item is defined:

11
A Covering precedure 2010/9/2 11 Given a non-compositional itemset R’, computes a set R’’ of extended itemsets equivalent to R’ and pairwise disjoint.

12
2010/9/2 12 R 1 = d{abcd} * d{abc} *

13
2010/9/2 13 R 3 = bc{d} - {ba} - {ad} * = bc{d} - {a} - {ad} *

14
2010/9/2 14 R=a{a} - b? S1 This means that no extended itemset is equivalent to R

15
2010/9/2 15 R 2 = ba{d} - {cd} * =bac?

16
2010/9/2 16 R = cd{ab} - {ab} * Partition the semantics s’(R) in two sets Removing any a? from R,

17
Merging Extended Itemsets 2010/9/2 17

18
2010/9/2 18 Given the regular itemsets R 1 =bac? and R 2 =bc They can be merged to b{ac} +

19
2010/9/2 19 Given the regular itemsets R 1 =b{ad} + and R 2 =bc{ad} * They can be merged to b{acd} +

20
Experimental Results 2010/9/2 20

21
Conclusion 2010/9/2 21 This paper introduced regular itemsets with an immediate semantics and interpretability.

Similar presentations

OK

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on statistics in maths what does the range Ppt on polynomials in maths what is the product Performance based pay ppt online Ppt on placement in hrm Ppt on interest rate risk Ppt on save water save life free download Ppt on artificial intelligence and global risk Ppt on series and parallel circuits diagram Ppt on uses of water for kindergarten Ribosome display ppt online