Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance update for soil and sediment samples and their simultaneous analysis of δ 15 N, δ 13 C, δ 34 S and NCS concentrations using an Elementar Vario.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Performance update for soil and sediment samples and their simultaneous analysis of δ 15 N, δ 13 C, δ 34 S and NCS concentrations using an Elementar Vario."— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance update for soil and sediment samples and their simultaneous analysis of δ 15 N, δ 13 C, δ 34 S and NCS concentrations using an Elementar Vario Isotope EA and Isoprime 100 IRMS. By Paul D. Brooks, Stefania Mambelli, Kari Finstad, Joey Pakes and Todd E. Dawson. Univ. of California, Berkeley

2 Disclaimer The product names used in this presentation are for information only and do not constitute a promotion or endorsement by the University of California, university affiliates or employees.

3 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank: Dr. Brian Fry, formerly Univ. of Hawaii. Dr. Andreas Rossmann, Isolab Germany. Steve Silva, USGS Menlo Park, Ca. Scott Hughes, Elementar Americas Inc. Robin Sutka, formally of Elementar Americas Inc. Everyone who has replied to questions on Isogeochem and has attended ASITA or earlier CFIRMS conferences.

4 Instruments used All information in this presentation were generated using: An Elementar vario ISOTOPE cube interfaced to: A Isoprime 100 mass spectrometer.

5 Why analyze NCS isotopes in one sample? Analysis of food web can greatly benefit from the addition of 34 S by adding an additional dimension to the analysis. Food web studies usually require a large number of samples to reduce the noise level of the data. Analysis for NCS concentration, then weighing out individual aliquots of each sample for separate N, C, S isotope analysis reduces the number of field samples that can be analyzed. Many samples are so small that it is impractical to subsample them into two different aliquots for analysis by two different methods. Combining samples results in the loss of the field sample noise which is usually critical to answering the experimental hypothesis in Ecosystem sciences.

6 Example of NCS data for individuals from stream population. Note noise level in populations and change in S ratio when N and C do not change. Samples from student Hiromi Uno.

7 Large number of samples required. Concentration required.  34 S may significantly improve source identification.

8 To be useful, the NCS isotope analysis must meet these requirements Be capable of a high throughput of over 60 unknown samples per day in order to analyze many field samples and reduce field noise level. Costs, sample preparation and ease of analysis should not be excessively higher than 15 N 13 C analysis. The analysis system must be able to analyze a wide sample range with different concentrations range of N, C and S. Precision and accuracy must be similar to conventional NC and S methods.

9 Problems solved for high throughput NCS isotope analysis S analysis usually uses one combined combustion reduction column with short lifetime. Solution: Use separate combustion and reduction columns connected with a heated quartz bridge. Only fill 110 mm center of reduction tube with Cu and heat to 880 °C. Variable 18 O in samples interferes with SO 2 mass 66 as 66 can be due to 34 S or 18 O. Solution: Use a magnesium perchlorate water trap immediately after the 1 st reduction tube followed by a 900 °C quartz buffering tube with CuO at center to buffer O. (Fry et al. 2002).

10 Silver sulfide with varying amounts of EDTA added to change C/S ratio with no quartz buffering tube. Silver sulfide with varying amounts of EDTA added to change C/S ratio with quartz buffering tube. O buffering of SO 2 with quartz buffering tube. Magnesium perchlorate drying tube before quartz tube. NOTE Y SCALES ARE DIFFERENT On every analysis we measure a AgS 2 standard with and without added sucrose with no difference in  34 S. Data from Robin Sutka.

11 Mitigation S memory Memory effects for S. Mitigation: Use a drying tube immediately after the 1 st Cu tube to trap water. Hypothesis, this may be due to SO 2 and H 2 O being in equilibrium with H 2 SO 3. Keeping the water trap hot may prevent H 2 O from condensing. This may be why a combined comb/red column or heated connection between separate combustion and copper tube is necessary for SO 2. Could SO 2 be dissolving in a H 2 O film? SO 2 + H 2 O H 2 SO 3

12 Test of various standards for memory effect. Currently 0.11-0.15 µgS on UCB system.

13 Water trap split to allow daily changes of magnesium perchlorate.

14 Split water trap in place over Cu column

15 Prevent SO 2 trailing, fully reduce NO x Problem: SO 2 begins to trail as ash build up in combustion tube. Solution: Trap SO 2 and release after all SO 2 is collected. Problem: NO x is not fully reduced in 880 °C Cu reduction column needed to pass SO 2. Solution: Use a second 650 °C Cu reduction column after the SO 2 trap. (Brian Fry, personal communication.)

16 Analyze N 29/28 and S 66/64 on same triple collector. Problem: As the N 29/28 ratio is much smaller than S 66/64, careful sample size selection based on prior knowledge of the N and S concentration is necessary to avoid saturating S on mass 66 or insufficient N on mass 28 with 10 volt AD converters. Solution: Use an IRMS with 100 volt AD converters for wide dynamic range.

17 Get accurate concentrations for NCS Concentration of N, C and S is not as precise using the IRMS as from the EA. Solution: Interface the MS and EA software so sample names and weights are input automatically into the EA software and the TCD concentration and IRMS isotope results are combined in one final Excel file.

18 Calibration requires a large number of standards. Preferred range of sample size is 30-1000 µgN, 0.2-5 mgC (adjustable with different dilution) and 10-140 µgS in a capsule. Calibration of all three isotopes requires a large number of standards. Solution: Use 120-place auto-sampler, a 10 minute per analysis method, and analyze 133 capsules with 46 standards per analysis and 81 unknowns, 3 standards and 3 blanks at beginning to stabilize system. 133 total capsules takes ≈22.2 hours. There is potential for reducing the number of standards required.

19 Preferred sample range 30-1000 µgN Bovine liver

20 TCD Heated quartz SO2 trap CO2 trap Bypass valves for SO2 P2O5 trap P2O5 trap P2O5 trap To MS Magnesium perchlorate trap Cu reduction tube 880 °C Tungsten oxide comb tube 1150°C Quartz buffering tube 900°C Cu WO3 CuO quartz 2 nd Cu reduction tube 650°C Final schematic for NCS isotope analysis Large size CO 2 trap.

21 Combustion tube, 1 st reduction tube, and magnesium perchlorate water trap.

22 Use tungsten oxide in long ash finger to mitigate long term memory and Increase combustion tube life.


24 TCD chromatogram

25 MS chromatogram

26 Is an added oxidant needed? V 2 O 5 melting temp 690 °C. Nb 2 O 5 melting temp 1512 °C. WO 3 melting temp 1473 °C. V 2 O 5 is very toxic and we do not allow its use by our undergraduates who weigh most of our samples and standards. Nb 2 O 5 or WO 3 are used as substitutes but do not seem to work as well (Steve Silva personal communication). Could this be because of melting temperature?

27 Is an extra oxidant needed? Oxidants seem to be added to help mitigate trailing problems with SO 2. This may not be necessary if the SO 2 is trapped, but depends on material (see later slides). %N d15 N %C d 13C %S d 34S avgstdevavgstdevavgstdevavg stde vavgstdevavgstdev peach w/Nb2O5 peach no Nb2O5 2.960.012.060.0348.410.61-25.863. Yolo soil w/Nb2O5 Yolo soil no Nb2O5 0.00-2.310.13 Joey Pakes data.

28 15 N and 13 C results are the same in NC and NCS mode Since the second Cu reduction tube was added 15 N results have been the same as in NC mode. 13 C results have always been the same.

29 S is more challenging (difficult). Mass 66 saturates at about 140 ug S with current system, potential exists to gain shift and increase the range. If the samples are all similarly small size then sample less than 4 µgS are feasible. The memory effect of the current system models at about 0.11-0.15 µg S as estimated by fitting a dual mixing model to the data. This may limit the precision and accuracy of small samples with big differences in isotope ratio. There is a phantom blank effect equivalent to about 0.8 µg S.

30  34 S vs µ S for standard


32 ≈ 0.8 µg S

33 Standardization procedure Use a calibration standard of 3.8-4.2 mg (32 µgS) bovine liver every 12 samples to correct for drift, large size minimizes carryover. Put a variable weight bovine liver after the calibration standard to use for QC. Put in 10 variable weight standards each of fishmeal and spirulina to check carryover, adjust linearity and normalize isotope values.

34 Post analysis calculation Drift correct between calibration standards using peak to peak correction. Check S carryover using variable weight fishmeal and spirulina standards. Summarize different standards data and move to dual mixing model spreadsheet for linearity and normalization correction. Check blank correction for S using fishmeal and spirulina.

35 Soils and sediment analysis. Soil analyze well for N and C, but S may be difficult for some soils and sediments. For example, SRM 1646a appears to have a slow release of S resulting in a big memory effect. This effect may in turn affect S analysis of later samples.

36 Soils analysis for NCS shows no bias with size and without V 2 O 5 show good agreement with other analysis. Sample Target mg Actual mg % Nug Nδ 15N% Cmg C δ 13C% Sug SFry δ 34S EM high organic B2151 55.080.69354.429.120.46-26.360.75434.49 EM high organic B2151 54.900.72354.449.260.45-26.310.76424.50 EM high organic B2151 1010.120.67684.569.330.94-26.350.73814.41 EM high organic B2151 109.890.67674.659.360.93-26.420.73794.25 EM high organic B2151 1010.150.67694.619.390.95-26.410.73814.12 avg 0.68 4.549.29 -26.370.74 4.35 std 0.02 0.100.11 0.050.02 0.16 CERTIFIED VALUE 4.42 +_.29 -26.27 +- 0.15 4.20 EM low organic B2153 7070.940.14986.951.551.10-27.570.02194.80 EM low organic B2153 7070.790.14976.871.541.09-27.500.02184.66 EM low organic B2153 7070.270.14976.911.561.09-27.420.02184.67 EM low organic B2153 140140.640.141906.791.542.17-27.390.02364.64 EM low organic B2153 140139.930.141896.911.532.15-27.310.02364.54 EM low organic B2153 140139.810.141896.911.552.16-27.250.02364.49 avg 0.14 6.891.55 -27.410.02 4.63 std 0.00 0.060.01 0.120.00 0.11 CERTIFIED VALUE 6.7 +-.15 -27.46 +_.11 4.94 +_ 1.4

37 Soils analysis for NCS shows no bias with size and without V 2 O 5 show good agreement with other analysis.

38 Note analysis works well up to 140 mg of soil, and possibly higher.

39 SRM 1646a sediment appears to introduce a memory effect.

40 A 2 stage memory dual mixing model corrected the memory effect. But how would the analyst know what correction to apply? Icacos soil 28-32 µgS

41 Anoxic sediment had a sever carryover and even appears to adsorb S from the next sample. N and C results looked good.

42 How to further improve NCS isotope analysis (and current NC analysis?) Provide at least 3 standards with all NCS values either heavy, light, and one to use as a QC in between. Treat soils for S analysis carefully, especially anoxic sediments.

43 Conclusions 1 The system can analyze 133 total capsules (samples including standards) in 22.2 hours. NCS mode requires additional standards, so 81 unknowns can be analyzed in 22.2 hours. Precision in a size range of 30-1000 µgN, 0.2-5 mgC and 10-140 µgS in a capsule compares well with separate NC and S analysis. The only significant additional maintenance compared to NCS is the changing of the 1 st Cu reduction tube and small water trap daily. S analysis is improved with capability to analyze 10 variable weight samples of 3 different 34 S isotope standards for a total of 30 normalization and QC standards.

44 Conclusions 2 S analysis should be over 10 µgS and better over 20 µgS which minimizes problems with blank correction and carryover. This is not difficult to achieve as the Vario Isotope Cube is easily capable of burning samples weighing of at least 10 mg. The upper limit on sample size has not been explored. Soil samples up to at least 140 mg can be analyzed. Some soil or sediment samples do not analyze well for S even though results for N and C are good. We have not tried to measure these problem sediment samples adding V 2 O 5 or other accelerants such as ammonium nitrate. We hypothesize that anaerobic sediments are problematic for S analysis as they have a large carryover.

45 References Fry, Brian. 2007. Coupled N, C and S stable isotope measurements using a dual-column gas chromatograph system. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 21:750-756. Fry, B., et al. 2002. Oxygen isotope corrections for online  34 S analysis. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 16:854-858. Sieper, Hans-Peter et al. 2006. A measuring system for the fast simultaneous isotope ratio and elemental analysis of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur in food commodities and other biological material. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 20:2521-2527. Hansen, T. et al. 2009. Simultaneous  15 N,  13 C and  34 S measurements of low biomass samples using a technically advanced high sensitivity elemental analyzer connected to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 23:2521-2527.

Download ppt "Performance update for soil and sediment samples and their simultaneous analysis of δ 15 N, δ 13 C, δ 34 S and NCS concentrations using an Elementar Vario."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google