Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAustin Purcell Modified over 4 years ago

1
Example 15.1b Prediction

2
15.115.1 | 15.2 | 15.1a | 15.2a | 15.2b | 15.3 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 15.615.215.1a15.2a15.2b15.315.415.515.6 The Problem n Besides the 50 regions in the data set, Pharmex, does business in five other regions, which have promotional expenses indexes of 114, 98, 84, 122, and 101. n Find the predicted Sales and a 95% prediction interval for each of these regions.

3
15.115.1 | 15.2 | 15.1a | 15.2a | 15.2b | 15.3 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 15.615.215.1a15.2a15.2b15.315.415.515.6 PHARMEX.XLS n This example cannot be solved with StatPro but it is relatively easy with Excels built-in functions. n We illustrate the procedure in this file shown here on the next slide. n The original data appear in Column B and C. We use the range names SalesOld and PromoteOld for the data in these columns. n The new regions appear in rows 8-12. Their given values of Promote are in the range G8:G12, which we name PromoteNew.

4
15.115.1 | 15.2 | 15.1a | 15.2a | 15.2b | 15.3 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 15.615.215.1a15.2a15.2b15.315.415.515.6

5
15.115.1 | 15.2 | 15.1a | 15.2a | 15.2b | 15.3 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 15.615.215.1a15.2a15.2b15.315.415.515.6 Solution n To obtain the predicted sales for these regions, we use Excels TREND function by highlighting the range H8:H12, typing the formula =TREND(SalesOld,PromoteOld,PromoteNew) and pressing Ctrl-Shift-Enter. n This substitutes the new values of the explanatory variable (in the third argument) into the regression equation based on the data from the first two arguments.

6
15.115.1 | 15.2 | 15.1a | 15.2a | 15.2b | 15.3 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 15.615.215.1a15.2a15.2b15.315.415.515.6 Solution -- continued n We then calculate the limits of a 95% prediction interval for each new region in columns I and J by going out two standard errors on each side of the predicted values in column H. n We see from the wide predication intervals how much uncertainty remains. n This implies that the point predication for this region, 112.03, contains a considerable amount of uncertainty. The reason is the relatively large standard error of estimate, s e.

7
15.115.1 | 15.2 | 15.1a | 15.2a | 15.2b | 15.3 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 15.615.215.1a15.2a15.2b15.315.415.515.6 Solution -- continued n If we reduce the s e, the length of the prediction interval would be reduced accordingly. n Contrary to what you might expect, this is not a sample size problem. A larger sample size would almost surely not produce a smaller value of s e. n The problem is that Promote is not highly correlated with Sales. n The only way to decrease se and obtain more accurate predictions is to find other explanatory variables that are more closely related to Sales.

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Applied Econometrics Second edition

Applied Econometrics Second edition

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google