Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJamie Meers Modified over 2 years ago

1
Scaling of Elliptic Flow for a fluid at Finite Shear Viscosity V. Greco M. Colonna M. Di Toro G. Ferini From the Coulomb Barrier to the Quark-Gluon Plasma, Erice (Sicily) 22 Sept. 2008 University of Catania INFN-LNS abeckwith@uh.edu

2
Reminder of v 2 at RHIC Evidences for non-ideal hydrodynamics Transport approach with only 2 2 scatterings /s time dependent cross section renormalized to fix /s v 2 (p T )/ v 2 (p T )/ Relation between v 2 (p T )/ and v 2 (p T )/ scaling ? effects of freeze-out /s Relation of /s with coalescence (QNS) /s hints at /s < 3/4 + coalescence at intermediate p T Outline Momentum anisotropy measure of /s Ferini et al., 0805. 4814 [nucl-th]

3
A measure of the Interaction: Elliptic Flow x y z pxpx pypy v 2 is the 2nd harmonic Fourier coeff. of the distribution of particles. Perform a Fourier expansion of the momentum space particle distributions Free streaming v 2 =0 The analysis can be extended ! Good probe of early pressure c 2 s =dP/d CASCADE =10 mb Similar trend in hydro

4
Hydrodynamics No microscopic details (mean free path -> 0, =0) + EoS Parton cascade v 2 saturation pattern reproduced Large =10-15mb (coalesc.includ.) Good description of hadron spectra and v 2 (p T ) Mass ordering of v 2 versus p T D. Molnar & M. Gyulassy, NPA 697 (02) First stage of RHIC Parton elastic 2 2 interactions

5
It’s not that perfect … Is it really zero ideal hydro (zero shear viscosity) ? B. I. Abelev et al., (STAR), PRC77 (08) STAR, J. Phys. G34 (2007) Not too peripheral Not too high p T Not too high harmonics

6
Relation between x and v 2 Ideal Hydrodynamics Ideal Hydrodynamics: Independent of - impact parameter - system size Bhalerao et al., PLB627(2005) 2v time Effect of finite s ?! Data show evidence for deviation from hydro scaling v 2 / Hydrodynamics Au+Au@200 GeV STAR, PRC77(08)

7
Small viscosity Large cross sections Strong couplings beyond pQCD Shear Viscosity 1)Quantum mechanism s > 1/15 : R. Lacey et al., PRL99(2006) 2) 4 SYM + Gauge theory g ∞: Smaller than any other known fluid! Can we constrain /s with v 2 ? Kinetic Theory

8
Study of dissipative effects on Study of dissipative effects on How sensitive is elliptic flow to finite /s? Z. Xu & C. Greiner, PRL 101(08) Agreement for s =0.3 – 0.6 /s=0.15 – 0.08 Dependence on freeze-out Viscous HydroCascade ( 2 2,2 3 ) P. Romatschke, PRL99 (07) Dependence on relaxation time II 0 order expansion with green terms ( D. Rischke )

9
Transport approach Solved discretizing the space in x, y cells Collision integral not solved with the geometrical interpretation, but with a local stochastic sampling Z. Xhu, C. Greiner, PRC71(04) In the limit t 0 and 3 x 0 exact solutions of the Boltzmann equation Convergency of v 2 results tested against variable t and 3 x discretization and test particle number. 3x3x

10
Cross section for fixed /s Cross section for fixed /s We simulate a constant shear viscosity during the HIC Relativistic Kinetic theory Cascade code We have used pQCD-like cross section with screening mass The viscosity is kept constant varying s = cell index in the r-space

11
Evolution of cross section with Temperature A rough estimate of (T) can be done using Neglecting and inserting in (*) At T=200 MeV tr 10 mb In our code it is evaluated locally (different from D. Molnar arXiV:0806.0026 ) (*)

12
Elliptic flow sensitive to the Shear Viscosity Au+Au @ 200 AGeV b=9 fm b=7 fm b=5 fm b=3 fm Sensitivity increasing at larger p T Intermediate p T can say more about /s 50% increase

13
“strong evidence for hydrodynamic scaling of v 2 over a broad selection of the elliptic flow data” Does v 2 / scaling validate ideal hydro? PHENIX PRL 98, 162301 (2007) Scaling with Centrality and System Size Such scalings holds also at finite viscosity? Scaling outside the hydro region

14
v 2 / and v 2 / as a function of p T bothboth Scaling for both v 2 / and v 2 / for both Au+Au and Cu+Cu Small /s does not break v 2 / the scaling Agreement with PHENIX data for v 2 / Violation of the scaling at higher /s /s 1/4 closer to data, but… Au+Au & Cu+Cu@200 AGeV /s=1/2 /s=1/

15
PHENIX, PRL98 (2007) Of course it is more complex… STAR, PRC77 (2008) v 2 / does not scale! Can a cascade approach account for this? Freeze-out is crucial! v 2 / scales!

16
Elliptic flow sensitive to freeze out Effect of freeze-out increasing with b For < c =0.7 GeV/fm 3 collisions are switched off b=3 fm /s=1/4 Effect of freeze-out

17
v 2 / and v 2 / with freeze-out V 2 / V 2 / broken in a way similar to STAR data Agreement with PHENIX and STAR scaling of v 2 / The freeze-out lowers the V 2 (p T ) at higher p T … (about 40% in b=3-9 fm) No freeze-out /s=1/4 v 2 / scaling brokenv 2 / scaling kept! Cascade can get both features:

18
Short Reminder … Enhancement of v 2 Quark Number Scaling Molnar and Voloshin, PRL91 (03) Fries-Nonaka-Muller-Bass, PRC68(03) Considering only momentum space x - p correlation neglected narrow wave function v 2 for baryon is larger and saturates at higher p T v 2q fitted from v 2 GKL, PRC68(03) v 2q (p T ) fitted. Is it reasonable the v 2 needed by coalescence?

19
v 2 (p T ) as a measure of /s v 2 / scaling reproduced, what about v 2 absolute value? /s >3/4 too low v 2 (p T ) at p T 1.5 GeV/c for quantitative estimate an EOS with phase transition ( ≠ 3p) needed! lower the estimate the /s PHENIX /s 0.1-0.2 + freeze-out Open the room to need coalescence in the region of QNS Finite /s shape for v 2 (p T ) consistent with that needed by coalescence

20
Freeze-out with /s from QGP HG Smooth transition of /s from minimal value (1/4 ) to the value typical of a pion-kaon gas (7/4 ) Previous results with sudden freeze-out confirmed GeV/fm 3 ] /s 1/4 8/4 1.70.3 HG QGP = 0.7GeV/fm 3 Preliminary

21
v 2 / ( ) scaling holds at finite /s up to 0.15 Freeze-out at =0.7 GeV/fm 3 or /s change from 1/4 7/4 (in cross-over region): Transport at finite /s pave the way for consistency: breaking of v 2 (p T )/ scaling persistence of v 2 (p T )/ scaling v 2 (p T ) need presence of coalescence at p T > 1.5 GeV with /s<3/4 Summary

Similar presentations

OK

Does HBT interferometry probe thermalization? Clément Gombeaud, Tuomas Lappi and J-Y Ollitrault IPhT Saclay WPCF 2009, CERN, October 16, 2009.

Does HBT interferometry probe thermalization? Clément Gombeaud, Tuomas Lappi and J-Y Ollitrault IPhT Saclay WPCF 2009, CERN, October 16, 2009.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on history of english literature Ppt on credit policy in banks Ppt on natural and artificial satellites diagram Convert pdf to word ppt online Ppt on schottky diode temperature Ppt on remote controlled screw jack Ppt on biodegradable and non biodegradable materials landfill Ppt on types of energy for kids Ppt on group development forming Ppt on leaders of the revolt of 1857