Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Extramedullary Compared with Intramedullary Implants for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures by Daniel D. Bohl, Bryce A. Basques, Nicholas S. Golinvaux, Christopher.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Extramedullary Compared with Intramedullary Implants for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures by Daniel D. Bohl, Bryce A. Basques, Nicholas S. Golinvaux, Christopher."— Presentation transcript:

1 Extramedullary Compared with Intramedullary Implants for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures by Daniel D. Bohl, Bryce A. Basques, Nicholas S. Golinvaux, Christopher P. Miller, Michael R. Baumgaertner, and Jonathan N. Grauer J Bone Joint Surg Am Volume 96(22): November 19, 2014 ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

2 The rate of serious adverse events did not differ between patients treated with an intramedullary implant and those treated with an extramedullary implant (14.1% compared with 12.4%, respectively) either before adjustment (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.3; p = 0... Bohl D D et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96: ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

3 With the exception of the rate of urinary tract infection, the rates of adverse events did not differ between patients treated with intramedullary compared with extramedullary implant either before or after adjustment. Bohl D D et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96: ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

4 The mean operation time did not differ between patients treated with an intramedullary implant compared with those treated with an extramedullary implant (54.8 compared with 55.3 minutes, respectively) either before adjustment (difference, −0.5; 95% CI, −2.... Bohl D D et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96: ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

5 The mean postoperative length of stay was shorter for patients treated with an intramedullary implant compared with those treated with an extramedullary implant (5.4 compared with 6.5 days), both before adjustment (difference, −1.1, 95% CI, −1.4 to −0.8; p... Bohl D D et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96: ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

6 The rate of readmission within thirty days of surgery did not differ between patients on the basis of implant type (9.6% for the intramedullary implant group compared with 9.5% for the extramedullary implant group) either before adjustment (RR, 1.0; 95% CI,... Bohl D D et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96: ©2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Download ppt "Extramedullary Compared with Intramedullary Implants for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures by Daniel D. Bohl, Bryce A. Basques, Nicholas S. Golinvaux, Christopher."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google