Presentation on theme: "1 Number of substitutions between two protein- coding genes Dan Graur."— Presentation transcript:
1 Number of substitutions between two protein- coding genes Dan Graur
3 Computing the number of substitutions between two protein- coding sequences is more complicated, because a distinction should be made between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.
6 Aims: 1. Compute two numerators: The numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. 2. Compute two denominators: The numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites.
7 1. The classification of a site changes with time: For example, the third position of CGG (Arg) is synonymous. However, if the first position changes to T, then the third position of the resulting codon, TGG (Trp), becomes nonsynonymous. Difficulties with denominator: T Trp Nonsynonymous
8 2. Many sites are neither completely synonymous nor completely nonsynonymous. For example, a transition in the third position of GAT (Asp) will be synonymous, while a transversion to GAG or GAA will alter the amino acid. Difficulties with denominator:
9 Difficulties with numerator: 1. The classification of the change depends on the order in which the substitutions had occurred.
10 Difficulties with numerator: 1. When two homologous codons differ from each other by two substitutions or more the order of the substitutions must be known in order to classify substitutions into synonymous and nonsynonymous. Example: CCC in sequence 1 and CAA in sequence 2. Pathway I: CCC (Pro) CCA (Pro) CAA (Gln) 1 synonymous and 1 nonsynonymous Pathway II: CCC (Pro) CAC (His) CAA (Gln) 2 nonsynonymous
11 Difficulties with numerator: 2. Transitions occur with different frequencies than transversions. 3. The type of substitution depends on the mutation. Transitions result more frequently in synonymous substitutions than transversions.
12 1. Classification of sites. Consider a particular position in a codon. Let i be the number of possible synonymous changes at this site. Then this site is counted as i/3 synonymous and (3 – i)/3 nonsynonymous. Methods: Miyata & Yasunaga (1980) and Nei & Gojobori(1986)
13 In TTT (Phe), the first two positions are nonsynonymous, because no synonymous change can occur in them, and the third position is 1/3 synonymous and 2/3 nonsynonymous because one of the three possible changes is synonymous.
14 2. Count the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in each sequence and compute the averages between the two sequences. The average number of synonymous sites is N S and that of nonsynonymous sites is N A.
15 3. Classify nucleotide differences into synonymous and nonsynonymous differences.
16 For two codons that differ by only one nucleotide, the difference is easily inferred. For example, the difference between the two codons GTC (Val) and GTT (Val) is synonymous, while the difference between the two codons GTC (Val) and GCC (Ala) is nonsynonymous.
18 For two codons that differ by two or more nucleotides, the estimation problem is more complicated, because we need to determine the order in which the substitutions occurred.
19 Pathway (1) requires one synonymous and one nonsynonymous change, whereas pathway (2) requires two nonsynonymous changes.
20 There are two approaches to deal with multiple substitutions at a codon:
21 The unweighted method: Average the numbers of the different types of substitutions for all the possible scenarios. For example, if we assume that the two pathways are equally likely, then the number of nonsynonymous differences is (1 + 2)/2 = 1.5, and the number of synonymous differences is (1 + 0)/2 = 0.5.
22 The weighted method. Employ a priori criteria to assign the probability of each pathway. For instance, if the weight of pathway 1 is 0.9, and the weight for pathway 2 is 0.1, then the number of nonsynonymous differences between the two codons is (0.9 1) + (0.1 2) = 1.1, and the number of synonymous differences is 0.9.
24 4. The numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous differences between the two protein-coding sequences are M S and M A, respectively.
25 The number of synonymous differences per synonymous site is p S = M S /N S The number of nonsynonymous differences per nonsynonymous site is p A = M A /N A
26 If we take into account the effect of multiple hits at the same site, we can make corrections by using Jukes and Cantor's formula:
29 Number of Amino-Acid Replacements between Two Proteins The observed proportion of different amino acids between the two sequences (p) is p = n /L n = number of amino acid differences between the two sequences L = length of the aligned sequences.
31 Number of Amino-Acid Replacements between Two Proteins The Poisson model is used to convert p into the number of amino replacements between two sequences (d ): d = – ln(1 – p) The variance of d is estimated as V(d) = p/L (1 – p)