Presentation on theme: "Biostatistics Core Southeastern Center for Air Pollution and Epidemiology (SCAPE) RD83479901 Lance Waller."— Presentation transcript:
Biostatistics Core Southeastern Center for Air Pollution and Epidemiology (SCAPE) RD Lance Waller
Personnel Lance Waller W. Dana Flanders (Epidemiologic methods) Mitchel Klein (Epidemiologic methods) Howard Chang (Spatiotemporal statistics) Thanks to: – Katie Gass (Doctoral Student, C&RT) – John Pearce (Post-doc, self-organizing maps) Welcome to: – Jenna Krall (Post-doc, spatiotemporal statistics)
Overall goals Biostatistical support within each project – Design and analysis plan – Analysis and interpretation Methodological development motivated by and applied to project data – Areas of particular interest: Spatiotemporal statistics Epidemiologic analysis Linking exposure(s) to outcome(s)
Embedded in Projects Project 1: Instrumentation for Comprehensive Air Quality –General discussions of quantifying measurement error Project 2: Commuter Study –Design and analysis plan –Data analysis and interpretation (Flanders) Project 3: Pediatric Birth Cohort –Plan for assessing confounding –Bayesian ensemble estimates for source apportionment (Chang) –Fused CMAQ exposure (Chang) Project 4: Multi-city time series –Model development to address within and between city variation –Source apportionment and epidemiologic associations (Krall)
Recent publications (to appear) Gass KM, Balachandran S, Chang HH, Russell AG, Strickland MJ. Ensemble-based source apportionment of fine particulate matter and emergency department visits for pediatric asthma. American Journal of Epidemiology, accepted. Reich BJ, Chang HH, Foley K. A spectral method for spatial downscaling. Biometrics, in press. Winquist A, Schauer JJ, Turner J, Klein M, Sarnat SE. Impact of ambient fine particulate matter carbon measurement methods on observed associations with acute cardiorespiratory morbidity. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, accepted. Chang HH, Hao H, Sarnat SE. A statistical modeling framework for projecting future ambient ozone and its health impact due to climate change. Atmospheric Environment 89: , 2014.
More publications Darrow LA, Klein M, Flanders WD, Mulholland JA, Tolbert PE, Strickland MJ. Air pollution and acute respiratory infections among children 0-4 years: an 18-year time-series study. American Journal of Epidemiology 180:968-77, Dionisio KL, Baxter LK, Chang HH. An empirical assessment of exposure measurement error and effect attenuation in bipollutant epidemiologic models. Environmental Health Perspectives 122(11): , Gass K, Klein M, Chang HH, Flanders WD, Strickland MJ. Classification and regression trees for epidemiologic research. Environmental Health 13:17, Hu X, Waller LA, Lyapustin A, Wang Y, Al-Hamdan MZ, Crosson WL, Estes MG, Estes SM, Quattrochi DA, Puttaswamy SJ, Liu Y. Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the Southeastern United States using MAIAC AOD retrievals and a two-stage model. Remote Sensing of Environment 140: , Hu X, Waller LA, Lyapustin A, Wang Y, Liu Y Year Spatial and Temporal Trends of PM2.5 Concentrations in the Southeastern U.S. Estimated Using High- Resolution Satellite Data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14:
More publications Neelon B, Chang HH, Ling Q, Hastings SN. Flexible space-time hurdle models for zero-inflated count data: exploring spatiotemporal trends in emergency department visits. Statistical Methods and Medical Research, 2014, DOI: / Pearce JL, Waller LA, Chang HH, Klein M, Mulholland JA, Sarnat JS, Sarnat SE, Strickland MJ, Tolbert PE. Using self-organizing maps to develop ambient air quality classifications for use in multipollutant health studies: a time-series example. Environmental Health 13:56, Russell A, Holmes H, Frieberg M, Ivey S, Hu Y, Balachandran S, Mulholland J, Tolbert P, Sarnat J, Sarnat S, Strickland M, Chang H, Liu Y. Use of Air Quality Modeling Results in Health Effects Research. In Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XXIII (D. Steyn and R. Mathur eds.) Sarnat JA, Golan R, Greenwald R, Raysoni AU, Kewada P, Winquist A, Sarnat SE, Flanders WD, Mirabelli MC, Zora JE, Bergin MH, Yip F. Exposure to Traffic Pollution, Acute Inflammation and Autonomic Response in a Panel of Car Commuters. Environmental Research 133: 66-76, 2014.
More publications Sororian S, Holmes H, Friberg M, Ivey C, Hu Y, Mulholland J, Russell A, Strickland M, Chang H. Temporally and spatially resolved air pollution in Georgia using fused ambient monitoring data and chemical transport model results. In Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XXIII (D. Steyn and R. Mathur eds.) Strickland MJ, Klein M, Flanders WD, Chang HH, Mulholland JA, Tolbert PE, Darrow LA. Modification of the effect of ambient air pollution on pediatric asthma emergency visits: susceptible subpopulations. Epidemiology 25(6):843-50, Winquist A, Kirrane E, Klein M, Strickland M, Darrow LA, Sarnat SE, Gass K, Mulholland JA, Russell AG, Tolbert PE. Joint effects of ambient air pollutants on pediatric asthma emergency department visits in Atlanta, Epidemiology 25:666-73, 2014.
Under development Review of statistical methods for mixtures A general definition of causal effects (Flanders and Klein) Partial correction for unmeasured confounders (Flanders) And many more…
Partial Correction for Unmeasured Confounding W. Dana Flanders et al
Background Prior Work In time-series and spatial analyses, previously showed how one can identify confounding and other model miss-specification, e.g.:
Background Prior Work
Works because X t+1 cannot be a cause of or conversely; In fact should be unassociated with after control of and if model correctly specified. (DAG) Model to be evaluated (correctly specified?) Diagnostic model
U t C t X t Y t X t+1 Causal Diagram, Example. X t+1 associated with Y t conditional on X t and C t. Y t = outcome, day t; C t = covariate, day t; X t = air pollutant, day t; X t+1 = air pollutant, day t+1; U t = covariate, day t;
U t C t X t Y t X t+1 Causal Diagram, Example. X t+1 independent of Y t conditional on X t and C t if no confounding. Y t = outcome, day t; C t = covariate, day t; X t = air pollutant, day t; X t+1 = air pollutant, day t+1; U t = covariate, day t;
Background Prior Work X t+1 occurs after the onset of disease (a ‘future variable’) X t+1 can be viewed as a negative control exposure (Lipsitch et al Epidemiol 2010) Relies on a central tenet of causality: A cause must precede its effect If a future variable is associated with past disease, after accounting for the relevant past exposures, this must reflect a spurious association
Background Proxy for a confounder “Often, when a confounder cannot be adequately measured, it is better to adjust for a surrogate confounder than to use the crude odds ratio (1).” Hernán et al. Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects Epidemiology. AJE 2002; 155: 176f. (1) Greenland S and Neutra R. Control of confounding in assessment of medical technology. IJE 1980; 9: 361f.
Propose a method to partially reduce confounding Build on prior work, using X t+1 X t+1 can be viewed as a surrogate or proxy for an unavailable confounder (X t+1 )... often better to adjust for it.
Key Assumptions for some continuous function g(.) of, correlation of and with unmeasured confounder both + or both - # alternatively:
Simulations based on real data Introduce confounding by fitting model without: Temperature lag0, lag1-3 Model cor(x t,x t+1 ) cor(x t,u t ) cor(x t+1,u t ) a) Drop T lag b) Drop all T
Simulations based on real data Introduce “confounding” by fitting model without: TmaxC-terms, or also Tmin-terms Crude Correct partial corrected a) b) Crude model omits Temperture Correct model includes Temperature lag0, lag1, lag2 Partial Corrected model: omits Temperature, but includes X t+1
Preliminary Conclusions Theory indicates less bias in linear case by including X, when confounding present (assumptions). Simulations suggest same for log-link. Mean squared error also often reduced No bias if include Future Indicator in absence of confounding, but can increase MSE
Preliminary Conclusions If ME not negligible, can increase bias & MSE Sensitivity analysis