Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Predictions of the Model of the Orbital Structure of Elementary Particles in regard to the Experimental Results from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Predictions of the Model of the Orbital Structure of Elementary Particles in regard to the Experimental Results from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Predictions of the Model of the Orbital Structure of Elementary Particles in regard to the Experimental Results from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

2 Collision of two protons Caption of the processes represented in the animation The distinct colours and sizes of the particles symbolize the distinct orbital quantum states of the electric charges. The quantum states with a single electric charge come from the rupture of the fundamental system, formed by a pair of integer and opposite electric charges.

3 Orbital Model versus Standard Model 1. In colliding, the two protons fuse into an excited unstable and highly energetic state, during which pairs of positive and negative charges are generated. In decaying, the electric charges fly out, at once that they acquire a proper quantum state having an orbital configuration, which defines the structure of each particle. The electric charges can be expelled in pairs as well as separately (broken pairs), leading thus to both neutral and charged particles. 1. In colliding, the two protons fuse into an excited unstable and highly energetic state, during which pairs of positive and negative charges are generated. In decaying, the electric charges fly out, at once that they acquire a proper quantum state having an orbital configuration, which defines the structure of each particle. The electric charges can be expelled in pairs as well as separately (broken pairs), leading thus to both neutral and charged particles. 2. So, our predictions envision that there will be no Higgs bosons, no quarks, no gluons. This will not be due to experimental shortcuts, but will be so for a very simple reason: these particles just do not exist. They are mathematical mirages, extracted from an animistic conception of mathematics, which consists in attributing a physical existence to determined mathematical entities. 2. So, our predictions envision that there will be no Higgs bosons, no quarks, no gluons. This will not be due to experimental shortcuts, but will be so for a very simple reason: these particles just do not exist. They are mathematical mirages, extracted from an animistic conception of mathematics, which consists in attributing a physical existence to determined mathematical entities.

4 3. The liberated energy from the incident protons only promotes the genesis of pairs of integer electric charges, but not of quarks, gluons and Higgs bosons. The presumption of the creation of integer electric charges derives straightforwardly from the fact that all the charged particles produced have an integer electric charge, corresponding so to the most direct deduction. 3. The liberated energy from the incident protons only promotes the genesis of pairs of integer electric charges, but not of quarks, gluons and Higgs bosons. The presumption of the creation of integer electric charges derives straightforwardly from the fact that all the charged particles produced have an integer electric charge, corresponding so to the most direct deduction. 4. It is worthwhile contrasting it with the complexity of the genesis of quarks with fractional electric charges with values -1/3, -2/3, +1/3 y +2/3, (without the possibility of quarks with charges 3/3, 4/3, 5/3, 6/3, etc.), which after while have to combine in such a way as to always lead to integer electric charges, according to the Standard Model. Moreover, why there is no quarks association that would generate elementary particles with fractional charges of value 1/3, 2/3, 4/3, 5/3? As well, an extra genesis of height types of gluons and the Higgs boson should be put in. Furthermore, leptons stay apart, not being composed of quarks. Higher the arbitrariness, lower the likelihood! In the genesis from the Orbital Model, only pairs of integer electric charges are produced, which are the only type of charges experimentally observed. 4. It is worthwhile contrasting it with the complexity of the genesis of quarks with fractional electric charges with values -1/3, -2/3, +1/3 y +2/3, (without the possibility of quarks with charges 3/3, 4/3, 5/3, 6/3, etc.), which after while have to combine in such a way as to always lead to integer electric charges, according to the Standard Model. Moreover, why there is no quarks association that would generate elementary particles with fractional charges of value 1/3, 2/3, 4/3, 5/3? As well, an extra genesis of height types of gluons and the Higgs boson should be put in. Furthermore, leptons stay apart, not being composed of quarks. Higher the arbitrariness, lower the likelihood! In the genesis from the Orbital Model, only pairs of integer electric charges are produced, which are the only type of charges experimentally observed. 5. The presumed “Big Bang“, as the explosion of the transitory state created through the collision between two incident protons, would have only led to the genesis of pairs of opposite electric charges, which in acquiring a coupled quantum state, would have generated all the variety of elementary particles. 5. The presumed “Big Bang“, as the explosion of the transitory state created through the collision between two incident protons, would have only led to the genesis of pairs of opposite electric charges, which in acquiring a coupled quantum state, would have generated all the variety of elementary particles.

5 6. To account for the multiplicity of particles produced by the collision of the protons (a total of about 80 known at present, disregarding resonant states), the Standard Model needs 36 different quarks (from colours and anti-quarks) to account for hadrons (baryons and mesons), and moreover 25 not composed of quarks represented by 12 distinct leptons, 8 types of gluons, 3 vector bosons W+, W–, y Z0, the photon and the Higgs boson, which gives 61 fundamental elements. Classifying them into families, as set in the Standard Model, does not reduce the number of components! So, to account for about 80 elemental particles, the Standard Model needs 61 fundamental elements. What a poor power of unification! Oppositely, the Orbital Model appeals only to the two integer electric charges, positive and negative. The variety of elementary particles is given by the quantum orbital of the charges. 6. To account for the multiplicity of particles produced by the collision of the protons (a total of about 80 known at present, disregarding resonant states), the Standard Model needs 36 different quarks (from colours and anti-quarks) to account for hadrons (baryons and mesons), and moreover 25 not composed of quarks represented by 12 distinct leptons, 8 types of gluons, 3 vector bosons W+, W–, y Z0, the photon and the Higgs boson, which gives 61 fundamental elements. Classifying them into families, as set in the Standard Model, does not reduce the number of components! So, to account for about 80 elemental particles, the Standard Model needs 61 fundamental elements. What a poor power of unification! Oppositely, the Orbital Model appeals only to the two integer electric charges, positive and negative. The variety of elementary particles is given by the quantum orbital of the charges. 7. Particles are usually conceived as elemental masses, with or without a coupled electric charge. In fact, it is more convenient to conceive them as electric charges with different coupled masses. This way, mass is no more taken for the primordial component, and passes to hold a secondary status which emerges from the quantum state coupled to each electric charge. This makes easier to grasp why there are so many different masses coupled to the electric charge. Having a single value, the electric charge appears thus as a more primordial entity than mass since allowing a multiplicity of quantized values, which hints at a complex origin. So much so, it is has not yet been achieved quantizing the mass of elementary particles. For the electric charge there is nothing to be quantized since its value is invariant. 7. Particles are usually conceived as elemental masses, with or without a coupled electric charge. In fact, it is more convenient to conceive them as electric charges with different coupled masses. This way, mass is no more taken for the primordial component, and passes to hold a secondary status which emerges from the quantum state coupled to each electric charge. This makes easier to grasp why there are so many different masses coupled to the electric charge. Having a single value, the electric charge appears thus as a more primordial entity than mass since allowing a multiplicity of quantized values, which hints at a complex origin. So much so, it is has not yet been achieved quantizing the mass of elementary particles. For the electric charge there is nothing to be quantized since its value is invariant.

6 8. The only novelty that can be expected from the LHC will be some new particles having not been produced through the less energetic collisions from earlier experiments, however these new particles will have the same structure as all others, based on the orbital spun by the electric charges. They would differentiate only by the specific quantum state in which ensues the orbital structure of each one. 8. The only novelty that can be expected from the LHC will be some new particles having not been produced through the less energetic collisions from earlier experiments, however these new particles will have the same structure as all others, based on the orbital spun by the electric charges. They would differentiate only by the specific quantum state in which ensues the orbital structure of each one. 9. The Orbital Model of the structure of elementary particles is highly unifying, since it confers the leading role to the sole electric charge, providing it with a coupled quantum state fixing the particles structure and their mass. The wide assortment of masses is hence easily figured out, since these derive from the variety of quantum states of the structural orbital defined by each electric charge. 9. The Orbital Model of the structure of elementary particles is highly unifying, since it confers the leading role to the sole electric charge, providing it with a coupled quantum state fixing the particles structure and their mass. The wide assortment of masses is hence easily figured out, since these derive from the variety of quantum states of the structural orbital defined by each electric charge. 10. As well as the Standard Model appeals to the Higgs boson to generate mass, in its place the Orbital Model appeals to the quantum state coupled to the electric charge, which defines the energy state of the structure of each particle and therefore of its mass as well. 10. As well as the Standard Model appeals to the Higgs boson to generate mass, in its place the Orbital Model appeals to the quantum state coupled to the electric charge, which defines the energy state of the structure of each particle and therefore of its mass as well.

7 11. The attitude of the official propaganda of the prominent scientific centres in systematically presenting their theoretical standpoints as if they were the unique ones, without considering or just mentioning alien standpoints, constitutes a dogmatic behaviour quite deplorable in the scientific field, making quite a disservice to progress. 11. The attitude of the official propaganda of the prominent scientific centres in systematically presenting their theoretical standpoints as if they were the unique ones, without considering or just mentioning alien standpoints, constitutes a dogmatic behaviour quite deplorable in the scientific field, making quite a disservice to progress. 12. In contrast with our disagreement with the Standard Model, being any worthy theoretical advice because of its conceptual basis being utterly fanciful, the technological mastering for such a titanic achievement to discover the very ultimate primordial elements is extremely merits. Certainly, such a cusp of technology will endure as an outstanding work ‑ edge. 12. In contrast with our disagreement with the Standard Model, being any worthy theoretical advice because of its conceptual basis being utterly fanciful, the technological mastering for such a titanic achievement to discover the very ultimate primordial elements is extremely merits. Certainly, such a cusp of technology will endure as an outstanding work ‑ edge. Text for impression: Animation with Flash Player: Animation with Quick Time: Orbital Model:


Download ppt "Predictions of the Model of the Orbital Structure of Elementary Particles in regard to the Experimental Results from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google