Presentation on theme: "Part 2 Congress and The Executive Power V. Power."— Presentation transcript:
Part 2 Congress and The Executive Power V. Power
X. Original Intent A. Framers saw a state of friction between the two branches because each had powers that would bring them into potential disagreement with each other. B. Separation of powers and checks on those powers were instituted to allow independent operations in their delegated areas and cooperation in others they shared.
C. Congressional Controls on the Executive Most Executive branch powers or duties are subject to Congress approval or oversight such as: - The budget process - Government operations - Law-making - Treaty ratification - War-making - Appointment confirmation - Veto override
XI. PRESIDENTIAL TECHNIQUES TO ACHIEVE HIS AGENDA Build coalitions: - Seek bipartisan solutions - Convert opponents to your side or defeat those who continue to oppose your policies. Use the bully pulpit, or special interests, and the media to mold public opinion against Congress via: - Press conferences; targeted issue speeches - State of the Union Address - Saturday radio addresses and YouTube messages - Meet the people events Executive orders: Do it his way
XII. THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY A. May occur as a result of powers inherent in the roles of Chief Executive, Commander-in-Chief, and foreign policy, whereby the President may decide to act unilaterally by using his constitutional powers for political reasons. Executive order: - A rule issued by the President only to Executive branch organizations ordering a policy or action to be followed or ended on his authority. These orders have the force of law, but are not binding on any future presidents.
Executive Order Examples -Emancipation Proclamation (1863) Lincoln ordered slaves freed in areas of rebellion - E.O (1942) Roosevelt ordered the internment of Japanese-Americans during WW2 -E.O (1979) Carter banned all U.S. intelligence agencies from conducting assassinations -E.O (2010) Obama placed a moratorium on new offshore oil drilling after the 2010 BP oil rig blowout
Imperial Presidency (contd) Executive privilege The right of the president to keep essential communications between him, his advisors and staff private. Some presidents have interpreted this as just about all communications. U.S. v. Nixon (1973)In U.S. v. Nixon (1973) the Court ruled that there is no presidential right to absolute, unqualified immunity in his communications that may be questionable as to subject, or which may serve as evidence of criminality.
IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY (CONT) Presidential finding Presidential finding In extraordinary situations, presidents may come to a conclusion that they should sign an authorization to violate a law so that a greater good may be attained outside that law. In extraordinary situations, presidents may come to a conclusion that they should sign an authorization to violate a law so that a greater good may be attained outside that law. - These findings may not legally hold up in the end. - These findings may not legally hold up in the end. Example: Iran-Contra Controversy (1986) Example: Iran-Contra Controversy (1986)
Imperial Presidency (contd) Signing statements Signing statements The President signs a bill into law, but states in writing that he believes part of the law to be unconstitutional and he intends to ignore it, implement it differently, or interpret it in ways he thinks are constitutional. The President signs a bill into law, but states in writing that he believes part of the law to be unconstitutional and he intends to ignore it, implement it differently, or interpret it in ways he thinks are constitutional.
XIII. Budgetary Imperialism A. Impoundment - President refuses to spend money (for any reason) that was legally appropriated by Congress for things in the budget. Reform and Impoundment Budget Act (1974) – Required president to spend funds unless Congress approved impoundment. – Created standing Budget Committees in both houses and the independent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to counter the presidents OMB.
Budget Fights Budget Fights The Presidents budget is a major source of political contention. It is reflective of each branchs agenda to cut, tax, or spend. Unified govt is no guarantee of a smooth budget process. Sequestration: President cuts money from the budget that was already appropriated by Congress without its approval in order to cut spending, or use the money to fund other programs not approved by Congress.
Failure to pass an annual budget may require passage of legislation to keep government funded at levels for the last budget cycle. This is called a continuing resolution. Failure to pass an annual budget may require passage of legislation to keep government funded at levels for the last budget cycle. This is called a continuing resolution. If one is not passed, the president may order a government shutdown and force a budget battle with Congress. If one is not passed, the president may order a government shutdown and force a budget battle with Congress.
B. Federal Spending Mandatory spending Expenses required by law. In 2013 mandatory spending represents over 60% of the annual budget. Both branches vow to protect certain expenditures (sacred cows) or cut them as pork thus creating budget impasses. Examples: - Entitlements (e.g. Social Security, Medicare, veterans pensions) - Interest on national debt - Welfare programs (e.g. food stamps, unemployment insurance) - Student Loans
Spending Types (contd) Discretionary spending- What is left over for all other govt needs and is the focus of Executive v. Legislative branch budget decisions and compromise. Examples: -- Defense -- Education -- National parks -- Transportation infrastructure -- Foreign aid - Disaster relief - Routine govt operations
XIV. WAR POWERS A. Only the President is the Commander-in-Chief and foreign policy initiator, NOT Congress. However, only Congress can declare war and only when requested by the president. B. Constitution subordinates the military to the decisions of civilian leaders. – The military implements what the President and his security advisors decide is in the nations strategic interest.
C. Imperial Commander-in-Chief Role of C-in-C has seen expansion of presidential war-making power outside of legislative checks by: - Designing defense strategy without input from Congress (Example: Pres. Obamas 2012 declaration to reduce U.S. nuclear weapon inventory by 80%) - Using military force without Congressional declaration of war, or not consulting first with them. (Example: 2011 US intervention in Libyan civil war) - Demanding legislation to expand emergency powers to protect nation at the expense of personal rights. (Example: Bush Jrs 2002 Patriot Act)
D. Using Military Force 1. Last declared war was WW2. Since then, presidents have used the military about 250 times to effect their foreign policy agenda without Congressional knowledge or a declaration of war. - Iranian hostage rescue (Carter) - Grenada invasion (Reagan) - Persian Gulf War (Bush Sr.) - Somalia intervention (Clinton) - Invasion of Iraq (Bush Jr.) - Attack on Libya (Obama )
E. WAR POWERS ACT Enacted as a Congressional reaction to Richard Nixons expansion of the Vietnam War into Cambodia in 1971 without Congress consent or knowledge. W.P.A. provisions: Presidents can send up to 10,000 troops into a hostile situation for a period of 60 days and have another 30 days to return them (90 day total) without notifying Congress or getting their approval.
War Powers Act To date, no president of either party has acknowledged the laws constitutionality. - None want to be constrained by it. - None has challenged it in court. Congress has never enforced it, although it has often threatened to.
Confiscate private property Set wage & price controls Ration strategic materials Control transportation & communications Mediate with labor Declare martial law & suspend habeas corpus XVI. Presidential Emergency Powers
WHAT PRESIDENTIAL CRITTERS AWAIT US IN THE 2016 ELECTION? END OF UNIT 9 (Part 2) THE PRESIDENCY