Presentation on theme: "IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC VISIUAL INDICATORS OF SEED MATURITY"— Presentation transcript:
1IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC VISIUAL INDICATORS OF SEED MATURITY SURAJ CHHETRISCHOOL OF CROP PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGYSURANAREE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
2INTRODUCTION Concept of seed physiological maturity (PM) PM is defined as occuring when the seed reaches its maximum dry weight and vigor (TeKrony et al. 1979).At PM nutrients are no longer flowing into the seed from the mother plant due to the breakdown of vascular bundle connecting seed to mother plant (TeKrony et al. 1979). .Moisture at PM is at certain level depending on crop and cultivar and the moisture totally depend with environment condition after PM (Copeland and MacDonald, 1995).PM permits an accurate measure of the duration of the grain filling period (Crookstton and Hill, 1878).
3INTRODUCTION Concept of seed physiological maturity PM also permits the estimation of harvest maturity (2 weeks)after PM when the seed moisture content is low enough fortemporary storage.Seed deterioration starts immediately after PM (Copeland andMacDonald, 1995).Figure 1. Seed and it’s relation to mother plant.Im- mature seedmature seed
4INTRODUCTION Concept of seed physiological maturity Figure 2. PM of Beans.PMPerdomo (1985)Seed VigorSeed Dry WeightSeed DiameterSeed Moisture
5INTRODUCTIONFigure 3. Examples of maturity marker in sorghum, wheat andmung bean.SorghumWheatMungbeanPPT in seed development and maturation, mungbean
6Physiological maturity-Maize Formation of black layerIntroduction and ObjectiveFormation of black layer in the placental region of corn as they matures were referred by Johann, 1935.Kiesselbach and Walker, 1952 reported that the formation of black layer might serve as a reliable indicator of PM in corn.The study was conducted to explore such possibilities of formation of black layer as simple, practical, visual characteristic of maize seed as an accurate indicator of PM.
7Physiological maturity-Maize Formation of black layerFour hybrid varieties of different maturity levels were evaluated.Six plants per hybrids were selected for daily sampling of kernels.The sampling started at the approach of maturity as indicated by hardening of upper part of kernels and continued several days after the seed had reached it’s maximum dry weight.Each day 10 kernels were removed from a single kernel row in the middle of each ear.
8Physiological maturity-Maize Formation of black layerTwo kernels per sample were cut lengthwise and development of black layer was examined and recorded.Figure 4. Length wise view for development of black layer in corn
9Physiological maturity-Maize Formation of black layerFigure 5. Basal view of black layer in corn with pedicel removed.
10Physiological maturity-Maize Formation of black layerFigure 6. Relationship between black layer formation and maximum kerneldry weights in cornHybridsMaximum kernel dry weights (gm)Appearance of black layer (%)Sx4849.251.7XL4556.055.7SX2958.356.7330662.660.8Black layer (%)Dry weights (gm)A close linear correlation was found among hybrids between blacklayer and maximum kernel dry weights.Maximum dry weight was attended when black layer formation wascompleted and no further weight increased was recorded.
11Physiological maturity-Maize Milk line as indicator of PMIntroduction and ObjectiveBlack layer formation takes place within short time andcauses inability to tell when it is formed.There is also variability in appearance consisting huge kernelmoisture ranging from 15.4 to 75%.Thus, the study on milk line as indicator of PM was done tocompare the reliability of kernel black layer formation andthe disappearance of kernel milk as visual indicator of cornPM which can be monitored over a period of time.(Afuakwa and Crookston, 1984).
12Physiological maturity-Maize Milk line as indicator of PMFive hybrids were evaluated .Sampling consist of harvesting 10 consecutive ears frommiddle row were collected in soft dough stage, dentedstage, half milk line stage, and every four days there after.Fresh weight, dry weight and moisture content weredetermined (following 5 days in a 60⁰C oven) .
13Physiological maturity-Maize Milk line as indicator of PMEars were broken in the middle and position of milk lineswere noted.Figure 7. Ears broken in themiddle for milk line determination in cornFigure 8. A milk lineappears across thekernel opposite theembryo side. Thisline advances downtoward the cop withmaturity and dried down.
14Physiological maturity-Maize Milk line as indicator of PMFigure 9. The position of milk line with different maturity level in cornThe milk line disappears the corn becomes more solid as the grain matures.PM seed has no milk line
15Physiological maturity-Maize Milk line as indicator of PMFigure 10. Accumulation of kernel dry weight by pioneer ‘ 3978’ in 1980 and Various development stages of the kernels are identified according to the days after planting and they occurred. The stages are S- soft dough, D- dented, H- half milk ,P1- PM according to least square regression analysis, P2- Dunca’s Multiple Range test ,P3- PM by Polynomial regression analysis, NM- No milk line stage,BL- Black layer completely formed.
16Physiological maturity-Maize ResultBlack layer developed in all varieties.The relationship between maximum kernel dry weight and black layer formation was linear.Soft dough stage signaled the beginning of milk to solid convertion.Soon after fully dented stage, the milk line became visible on the kernel face opposite the germ and its progression could be monitored.Kernel moisture at the half milk line stage was 40%.Loss of all milk from kernel occurred an average of 2 days prior to black layer formation.Disappearance of milk line coincided with maximum kernel dry weight.
17Physiological maturity-Maize DiscussionUnder normal conditions both ( milk line and black layer formation) occurred simultaneously.But under stress condition black layer formation occurred while endosperm milk was still present.Black layer formation can be more reliable indicator of PM because of its consistence formation irrespective of environmental condition and grain moisture content because kernel don’t accumulate dry mater after black layer formation.Milk line is more useful in monitoring grain maturation prior to PM because it can be easily visible and monitored during the maturation period.
18Physiological maturity-Soybean Introduction and ObjectivePrevious studies on soybean maturity was based on the loss of green color in the pod as indicator of PM (Crookstoon and Hill, 1978; Tekernoy et al., 1979).These studies were subjective and based on pods attached at specified nodes on the lower portion of the stem, thus the usefulness of their criteria for indicating PM of an entire soybean plant was not determined.The present study was therefore being done to determine if the loss of green color from pods was a reliable indicator of PM of an entire soybean plant or not.Gbikipi and Crookstoon, 1981
19Physiological maturity-Soybean Figure11. Soybean field at different maturity stagesnot maturePMHMhttps://kb.osu.edu
20Physiological maturity-Soybean Figure 12. Sequence of pod formation and seed filling
22Physiological maturity-Soybean Figure 14(a). The whole-plant dry weight (solid lines) and seed moisture content (dashed lines) of 4 soybean cultivars. Physiological maturity (PM) was determined as the intercept of a line representing mature seed weight and with a slope of the rate of seed weight increase.NoVisual characters1Pod containing a green seed ( at one of the four uppermost nodes2One normal pod on the main stem that has reached it’s mature color3Pods free of green color4Leaves free of green color5Pods brown6Petioles free of green color7Stems free of green color8Leaves fallen
23Physiological maturity-Soybean Figure 14(b). Frequency of occurrences of criteria of 4 soybean cultivars over 2 years.(6)(6)NoVisual characters2One normal pod on the main stem that has reached it’s mature color3Pods free of green color
24Physiological maturity-Soybean Figure 15. Soybean PM and visual marker of maturity
25Physiological maturity-Soybean ResultCriteria no 3 ( pods free of green color) coincided with calculated PM most consistently.Criteria no 2 ( one normal pod on main stem that has reached its mature color) was useful predictor of the date of occurrence of PM.At PM the moisture content of individual seed was 55%.The average moisture content of all seed at PM was 44% due to different maturity timing ( difference of 11 days)Criteria no 4, 6, 7 and 8 occurred at variable time periods from the point of PM for each cultivar.Harvest maturity (13% MC) occurred 10 to 13 days after physiological maturity.
26Physiological maturity-Soybean DiscussionCriteria no 3 ( pods free of green color) can be regarded as prediction of PM.The result also confirms the previous studies of loss of green color in pod as indicator of PM of entire soybean plant.
27Seed maturity-Cabbage Chlorophyll fluorescence of the testaFigure 17. Chlorophyll content of cabbage seedradio.weblogs.com/.../221205_cabbage_seed.jpg
28Seed maturity-Cabbage Chlorophyll fluorescence of the testaFigure 18. Seed quality and germination performances of cabbage seed
29Seed maturity-Cabbage Chlorophyll fluorescence of the testaResult and DiscussionThe germination performance was inversely related to the magnitude of the CF signal.The seeds from the subsample with the lowest CF signal germinated at 100% and had highest germination rate.The very high CF subsample had significantly reduced performance.It is useful as non-distructive marker of maturity and germination performance.It can be used in determining maturity and quality of all types of seeds for which the chlorophyll is broken down during the maturation process.
30Physiological maturity-Sunflower Introduction and ObjectiveSeveral studies have been conducted in determiningsunflower PM based on visual character (color) but they aresubjective and may vary with environmental conditions.This visual character have not been validated in terms ofmaximum fruit dry weight.Studies on relationship of MC at PM of sunflower have alsobeen done but there is no appropriate model that matchesseed dry matter accumulation to seed MC.Therefore the study was conducted with the objectives ofPM in sunflower coincides with fixed seed MC whichcoincides with maximum seed dry matteraccumulation.
31Physiological maturity-Sunflower Influence of seed in capitulum in determining PM in SunflowerFigure 19. Flower arrangement and seed development in capitulum of sunflowerFlowering begins at periphery and progress towards center. It takes 5-12 days depending on total no of floral circle and genotypes . PM at periphery Is earlier than center.waynesword.palomar.edu/images/capitul2.gif
32Physiological maturity-Sunflower Plants were grown in different condition (open field andgreen house).Sampling began at flowering and continued 30 days afterPM (when final seed weight did not increase).The seed were harvested at 2-3 days interval fromperipheral and intermediate positions on capitulum.Fresh (seed weighed 3-5 minutes after harvest) and dryweight (48 h at 60 ⁰C) was determined.
33Physiological maturity-Sunflower Figure 21. Relative SDW and MC for peripheral seeds in 8 genotypes of sunflower.At moisture content 38⁰% all genotypes had maximumSDW which did not increase later.
34Physiological maturity-Sunflower Relationship of seed dry weight and water content in intermediate and peripheral seeds of 2 genotype sunflowerFigure22. Dynamics of SDW (square)And MC (circles) between peripheral(closed symbols) and intermediate(open symbols)Seed at intermediate achieved lower SDW and reached PM later than fruit at peripheral.Seed at intermediate had greater MC than peripheral at all times.
35Physiological maturity-Sunflower Standardization of SDW and WCFigure 23 . Relative SDW and MC for peripheral and intermediate seed of 8 genotypes of sunflowerAt moisture content 38⁰% all genotypes had maximum SDW which did not increase later
36Physiological maturity-Sunflower Figure 25. Picture of mature sunflowerYellow back with bracts beginning turn brown, PM (38% MC)White seedImmature seedGray seedmature seed
37Physiological maturity-Sunflower ResultSeed MC of 38% proved strong indicator of PM.Seed from intermediate position in capitulum startedgrowing 3-5 days later than peripheral seeds and matured3-8 days later.At anthesis seed MC was 89% and dropped continuouslyduring grain filling and post PM periods.Seed MC at intermediate was higher than peripheral atall time from start of anthesis.
38Physiological maturity-Sunflower DiscussionAlthough there were difference in maturity level and SDWvariation between intermediated and peripheral fruits butthose were minimize by standardization using relative SDWof all genotypes.The relationship between Relative SDW and MC showedsimilar characteristic across position when fitted in tri-linearfunction.The work has been carried out in various conditions usingall possible characteristic of sunflower development.Random sampling of grain at water concentration of 38%involved only a small yield penalty (<5%).
39ReferencesAfuakwa, J. J. and R. K. Crookston usuing the kernel milk line to visually monitor grain maturity in maize.Crop Sci. 24:Crookston, R. K., and D. S. Hill A visual indicator of the physiologicalmaturity of soybean seed. Crop Sci. 18:Daynard, T. B and W. G. Duncan The black layer and grain maturity in corn. Crop Sci. 9:Gbikpi, P.J. and R. K. Crookstoon A whole-plant indicator of soybean physiological maturity. Crop Sci. 21:Jalink , H., A. Frandas, R. Van Der Schoor, J.B. Bino Chlorophyll fluorescence of the testa of Brassica oleracea seeds as an indicator of seed maturity and seed quality. Sci. agris., Piracicaba, 55:Rondanini, D. P., R. Savin, and A. J. Hall Estimation of physiological maturity in sunflower as a function of fruit water concentration. Europ. J. Agronomy 26:TeKrony, D.M., D. B. Egli, J. Ballas, T. Pfeifferet, and R. J. Fellows Physiological maturity in soybean. Agron. J. 71:
40Thanks for your attention! Questions and comments are greatly appreciated!