Presentation on theme: "Using Assessment to Inform Instruction Dominie Training Laurens 55 May 29, 2008 Patti Hunnicutt."— Presentation transcript:
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction Dominie Training Laurens 55 May 29, 2008 Patti Hunnicutt
Why Dominie? Is it informative assessment? Formative assessment, on the other hand, delivers information during the instructional process, before the summative assessment. Both the teacher and the student use formative assessment results to make decisions about what actions to take to promote further learning. It is an ongoing, dynamic process that involves far more than frequent testing, and measurement of student learning is just one of its components. Language Arts December 2007 Vol 65
“ Assessment must serve the learner. This is of the utmost importance. Assessment must promote learning, not just measure it. That is, when learners are well served, assessment becomes a part of the learning experience that supports and improves instruction. The learners are not just the students, but also the teachers, who learn something about their students.” Conversations Regie Routman p. 559
Teacher Knowledge What to teach… What is appropriate to teach… How students’ learn… How to engage students in effective learning… How to connect what students know, to what they need to know to be more effective readers and writers…
What I've Learned About Effective Reading Instruction from a Decade of Studying Exemplary Elementary Classroom Teachers By Richard L. Allington Using data from a lengthy study of first- and fourth grade teachers in six states, Mr. Allington concludes that enhanced reading proficiency rests largely on the capacity of classroom teachers to provide expert, exemplary reading instruction — instruction that cannot be packaged or regurgitated from a common script because it is responsive to children's needs.
A series of studies have confirmed what was probably obvious from the beginning. Good teachers, effective teachers, matter much more than particular curriculum materials, pedagogical approaches, or "proven programs.” It has become clearer that investing in good teaching — whether through making sound hiring decisions or planning effective professional development — is the most "research-based" strategy available. If we truly hope to attain the goal of "no child left behind," we must focus on creating a substantially larger number of effective, expert teachers.
Time These teachers maintained a "reading and writing versus stuff" ratio that was far better balanced than is typically found in elementary classrooms. In other words, these teachers routinely had children actually reading and writing for as much as half of the school day — around a 50/50 ratio of reading and writing to stuff (stuff is all the other things teachers have children do instead of reading and writing). In typical classrooms it is not unusual to find that children read and write for as little as 10% of the day(30 minutes of reading and writing activity in a 300-minute— five-hour — school day).
The exemplary elementary teachers we studied recognized this critical aspect of instructional planning. Their students did more guided reading, more independent reading, more social studies and science reading than students in less effective classrooms. But the teachers' instructional planning involved much more than simply allocating lots of time for reading and writing.
Text If children are to read a lot throughout the school day, they will need a rich supply of books they can actually read. This seems a simple statement of fact. But there also exists a large and potent research base that supports supplying children with books of appropriate complexity. In the classrooms of exemplary teachers, lower-achieving students spent their days with books they could successfully read. This has not typically been the case in less effective classrooms.
Teaching The exemplary teachers in our study routinely gave direct, explicit demonstrations of the cognitive strategies that good readers use when they read. In other words, they modeled the thinking that skilled readers engage in as they attempt to decode a word, self-monitor for understanding, summarize while reading, or edit when composing. The "watch me" or "let me demonstrate" stance they took seems quite different from the "assign and assess" stance that dominates in less effective classrooms.
Talk We observed the exemplary teachers fostering much more student talk — teacher/student and student/student — than has previously been reported. In other words, these exemplary teachers encouraged, modeled, and supported lots of talk across the school day. This talk was purposeful talk, though, not simply chatter. It was problem-posing, problem- solving talk related to curricular topics.
The classroom talk we observed was more often conversational than interrogational. Teachers and students discussed ideas, concepts, hypotheses, strategies, and responses with one another. Teachers posed more "open" questions, to which multiple responses would be appropriate.
Examples of questions Question 1: How was Ruby Bridges like the other freedom heroes mentioned in the timeline? Question 2: So, what other story have we read that had an ending like this one? Question 3. Has anyone had a problem with a pet like the boy in the story?
Tasks Another characteristic of these exemplary teachers' classrooms was greater use of longer assignments and less emphasis on filling the day with multiple, shorter tasks. In these classrooms students often worked on a writing task for 10 days or more. They read whole books, completed individual and small- group research projects, and worked on tasks that integrated several content areas (reading, writing, and social studies). The work the children in these classrooms completed was more substantive and challenging and required more self-regulation than the work that has commonly been observed in elementary classrooms.
Testing The exemplary teachers often used a rubric-based evaluation scheme to assign grades. Improvement was noted based on where students started and where they ended up, rather than on the latter alone. We observed almost no test-preparation activity in these classrooms. Instead, these teachers believed that good instruction would lead to enhanced test performance.
Summary In order to think about using assessment to inform instruction, we must think about our expectations for teachers and teaching. Our study of these exemplary teachers suggests that such teaching cannot be packaged. Exemplary teaching is not regurgitation of a common script but is responsive to children's needs.
The Question What is your primary responsibility as a coach? Are we creating classrooms in which every year every teacher becomes more expert?
How do we work toward improving instruction? How do we work toward improving instruction? Being aware of what good teaching looks like and sounds like. Giving explicit feedback. Providing relevant ongoing staff development. Giving explicit feedback. Providing teachers with time to talk and reflect with colleagues. Giving explicit feedback.
Ways of Knowing Formal assessment Informal assessment
Informal Assessment Observation (“kid-watching”) Questioning Learning log Reviewing student work Interview/conference with learner
Continuous Assessment Modify the Instructional Plan/Implementation Plan and Implement Informal and Formal Assessment Evaluate and inform using Protocols
The Reading Process EMERGENT Inconsistently use early strategies: ◦one-on-one matching ◦Monitoring (repeating; self-correcting) ◦cross-checking Read easy patterned text with picture support with fluency Practice skills acquired on easy materials Link known initial and final sound symbols to new words Get "mouth ready" for an unknown word Have limited sight vocabularies Retell text with simple/interchangeable storyline Respond to text at a literal level
EARLY/DEVELOPING Search for and use cues with increasing independence Self-monitor and self-correct when prompted Read familiar text fluently Lack stamina needed for chapter books/novels Read longer text with smaller print Read with good phrasing and expression Hear/use some medial sounds to identify new words Identify "chunks" and analyze longer words on their own or with support Increase sight vocabulary Retell text with story structure to capture story elements Respond to reading content with inconsistent comprehension
FLUENT Use cues flexibly and effectively Integrate use of cues/strategies Self-monitor Problem-solve independently Read smoothly using appropriate speeds Able to scan ahead/predict Transfer known information to unknown words independently Able to visually analyze words in text "on the run" Have control of multi-syllable words Read longer books with more complex written style Have an extensive sight vocabulary Retell complex storyline to include plot and some detail Respond to a variety of reading genre with comprehension
Dominie Reading Categories Emergent Readers and Writers Usually kindergarten or beginning of 1st grade Learning about purposes of reading and writing Understanding concepts of words and letters Learning one to one matching Using known words to learn new words
Early Readers and Writers End of kindergarten beginning of 1st grade Beginning to establish foundational concepts about written language Using what they know to begin strategic problem solving Voice and print matching and concepts of directionality Visual searches for info in print
Developing Readers and Writers Middle of first grade Gained strategic control Refining problem solving abilities When reading familiar text they exhibit phrasing and fluent reading tendencies
Self-Extending Readers and Writers Second and third grade students Established a wide range of strategies Tend to read with greater accuracy Developing deeper levels of comprehension More able to discuss what they have read Need to learn to be more flexible and have a range of strategies for attacking new words Are more comfortable with silent reading and read for longer periods of time
Independent Readers and Writers Usually fourth grade and beyond Engage in independent exploration Must become effective and analytical about what they read and write Encountering a greater range of vocabulary when reading different genres Need to gain in fluency and flexibility reading both fiction and non fiction text Constructing meaning through independent, small group and large group experiences with reading and writing
What is Reading? Marie Clay defines reading as: I define reading as a message-getting, problem-solving activity which increases in power and flexibility the more it is practiced. My definition states that within the directional constraints of the printer’s code, language and visual perception responses are purposefully directed by the reader in some integrated way to the problem of extracting meaning from cues in a text, in sequence, so that the reader brings a maximum of understanding to the author’s message.
We ask questions all the time as we read and our theories of what might occur work so well that we are scarcely aware that they exist. We only become aware of our questioning when our answers fail to match the information before us. Asking questions is a means of eliminating alternatives. We can encourage children to ask themselves questions and develop their strategies for improving predictions. All this applies to reading and writing. We must read by asking and answering questions if we are to understand what we are reading. Marie Clay Becoming Literate, page 6
Meaning Cues Meaning cues are the sources of information which a reader uses to make sense of a text. Meaning is the most important part of reading. It is the interaction between reader and text. Prior knowledge Story sense Illustrations
Structure Cues Structure cues are the sources of grammatical information which allow the child to construct sentences and predict how will sentence will unfold. Natural language Knowledge of English
Visual Cues Visual cues are the attention to print details, directionality, letter/sound relationships, punctuation marks, word configuration, print size, and other concepts of print.
What about the Essential Five Components? Phonemic Awareness Phonics Vocabulary Fluency Comprehension What else is involved in the reading process?
Hints for beginning Text Reading Levels After scoring the Sentence Writing and Spelling record the stanines for the phonemes and the spelling Average the two stanines Stanines 1, 2 or 3 begin with a benchmark or bridging book that is one or two levels below the child’s grade level Stanine 4, 5 or 6 begin with a benchmark or bridging book that is on the grade level Stanine 7, 8 or 9 begin with a benchmark or bridging book that is a level or two above their grade level. Hints for beginning Text Reading Levels After scoring the Sentence Writing and Spelling record the stanines for the phonemes and the spelling Average the two stanines Stanines 1, 2 or 3 begin with a benchmark or bridging book that is one or two levels below the child’s grade level Stanine 4, 5 or 6 begin with a benchmark or bridging book that is on the grade level Stanine 7, 8 or 9 begin with a benchmark or bridging book that is a level or two above their grade level.
Summary of Assessment Effective assessment must be a continuous process. It must provide teachers with data that can be used to enhance learning opportunities. Assessment is more than the traditional test; it is more a process of reaction, refection, and redirection.
Summary of Assessment Assessment provides opportunities for students to assume a sense of responsibility for their own learning. When actively engaged in the assessment process, students become less teacher dependent and more independent. Assessment respects the child and preserves and enhances his or her self- esteem. Assessment should be used to improve instruction and gauge progress; it does not simply assign numerical scores to reading achievement.
Summary of Assessment Assessment provides opportunities for teachers and students to work toward common curricular goals, both short-term and long-term. It is important to consider assessment as a positive feature of literacy learning. Assessment is a cooperative activity between teachers and students. It is not something done to students, but rather an activity done with students.
In general, when the child is hard to accelerate he is finding some part or parts of the reading process difficult. Oftentimes he has learned to do something, which is interfering with his progress, and he may have learned it from the way you have been teaching. (Teaching Struggling Readers, Lyons quoting Guidebook, Clay, pg. 57)
Observation Observe the idiosyncratic way the child interacts while reading and writing; Describe the child’s reading and writing strengths behaviorally and specifically;\ Analyze the behaviors in relation to the entire complex processing system needed to read and write; Think about problem behaviors in relation to cognitive and emotional development; Determine when problem behaviors occur and how often they are repeated throughout the lesson;
Observation Think about what the teacher does or does not do in response to the child’s affective and cognitive processing; Think about what the child does in response to the teacher’s actions and verbal non-verbal responses; Decide which affective behaviors to address an/or prevent; Prioritize actions and responses and determine what needs to be done first;
Observation Decide under what circumstances, when, and how to intervene; Determine the affective and cognitive behavioral indicators to watch for to suggest children are gaining control and becoming self-regulated; Record on the lesson record what children do and say in response to the teacher’s actions. From: Teaching Struggling Readers, Lyons. Pg. 97