Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byGustavo Holloway Modified over 3 years ago

1
Patterns in a vertically oscillated granular layer: (1) lattice dynamics and melting, (2) noise-driven hydrodynamic modes, (3) harvesting large particles – Experiments Dan Goldman (now Berkeley) Mark Shattuck ( now City U. New York) Harry Swinney University of Texas at Austin – Simulations Sung Jung Moon (now Princeton) Jack Swift Southern Workshop on Granular Materials Pucón, Chile 10-13 December 2003

2
Particles in a vertically oscillating container light f = frequency (10-200 Hz) = (acceleration amplitude)/g = 4 2 f 2 /g (2-8)

3
Square pattern f = 23 Hz acceleration = 2.6g Particles: bronze, d=0.16 mm layer depth = 3d 1000d

4
OSCILLONS peak crater localized oscillatory: f /2 nonpropagating stable Umbanhowar, Melo, & Swinney, Nature (1996)

5
Oscillons: no interaction at a distance

6
Oscillons: building blocks for molecules each molecule is shown in its two opposite phases dimer tetramer polymer chain

7
Oscillons: building blocks of a granular lattice? each oscillon consists of 100-1000 particles

8
Dynamics of a granular lattice 18 cm Goldman, Shattuck, Moon, Swift, Swinney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) = 2.90, f = 25 Hz, lattice oscillation 1.4 Hz snapshot snapshot: close up time evolution

9
Coarse-graining of granular lattice: frequency at edge of Brillouin zone A lattice of balls connected by Hooke’s law springs? Then the dispersion relation would be: where k is wavenumber and a is lattice spacing

10
Compare measured dispersion relation with lattice model lattice model f Lattice (Hz) = 2.75 k Brillouin Zone (for (1,1) T modes) From space-time FFT I (k x,k y,f L )

11
Create defects: make lattice oscillations large = 2.9 FFT apply FM 52 cycles later 235 cycles later DEFECTS modulation rate = 2 Hz 32 Hz container position: Resonant modulation: FM at lattice frequency:

12
Frequency modulate the container, and add graphite to reduce friction MELTING = 2.9, f = 32 Hz, f mr (FM) = 2 Hz add graphite by 175 cycles: melted 56 cycles later

13
MD simulation: reduce friction to zero crystal melts (without adding frequency modulation) = 0.5 = 0 22 cycles later 100 cycles later: melted = 3.0, f = 30 Hz

14
Lindemann criterion for crystal melting Lindemann ratio: where u m and u n are displacements from the lattice positions of nearest neighbor pairs, and a is the lattice constant. Simulations of 2-dimensional lattices in equilibrium show lattice melting when Bedanov, Gadiyak, & Lozovik, Phys Lett A (1985) Zheng & Earnshaw, Europhys Lett (1998)

15
Lindemann criterion = 0.5: no melting Test Lindemann criterion on granular lattice MD simulations lattice melts = 0.1 melting threshhold Goldman, Shattuck, Moon, Swift, Swinney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003)

16
Conclude: granular lattice is described well by discrete lattice picture. How about a continuum description? Granular patterns: as in continuum systems -- vertically oscillated liquids, liquid crystals, … --- squares, stripes, hexagons, spiral defect chaos Instabilities as in Rayleigh-Bénard convection --- skew-varicose, cross-roll

17
Spiral defect chaos Rayleigh-Bénard convection Granular oscillating layer deBruyn, Lewis, and Swinney Phys. Rev. E (2001) Plapp and Bodenschatz Physica Scripta (1996)

18
Skew-varicose instabililty observed in granular expt: same properties as skew-varicose instability of Rayleigh-Bénard convection rolls wavelength increases deBruyn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (1998) 1 2 34

19
wave- length decreases de Bruyn, Bizon, Shattuck, Goldman, Swift, and Swinney, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1998) Cross-roll instability observed in granular experiment: same properties as cross-roll instability in convection

20
Continuum models of granular patterns Tsimring and Aranson, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1997) Shinbrot, Nature (1997) Cerda, Melo, & Rica, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1997) Sakaguchi and Brand, Phys. Rev. E (1997) Eggers and Riecke, Phys. Rev. E (1998) Rothman, Phys. Rev. E (1998) Venkataramani and Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1998)

21
Convecting fluids: thermal fluctuations drive noisy hydrodynamic modes below the onset of convection Theory: Swift-Hohenberg eq., derived from Navier-Stokes Swift & Hohenberg, Phys Rev A (1977) Hohenberg & Swift, Phys Rev A (1992) Experiments : convecting fluids and liquid crystals: Rehberg et al., Phys Rev Lett (1991) Wu, Ahlers, & Cannell, Phys Rev Lett (1995) Agez et al., Phys Rev A (2002) Oh & Ahlers, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2003) Granular systems are noisy. Can hydrodynamic modes be seen below the onset of patterns?

22
Noise below onset of granular patterns 6.2 cm snapshot time evolution 170 m stainless steel balls (e 0.98) time (T) = 2.6, f = 30 Hz x

23
Increase toward pattern onset at c = 2.63 : S max (k) increases 0 15 30 45 60 Hz |k| P(f) S(k x,k y )

24
Emergence of square pattern with long-range order S(k x,k y ) P(f) frequency of square pattern container frequency S(k) = 2.8 k

25
Swift-Hohenberg model for convection: from Navier-Stokes eq. with added noise If no noise ( F = 0) (“mean field”), pattern onset is at But if F 0, onset of long-range (LR) order is delayed, Xi, Vinals, Gunton, Physica A (1991); Hohenberg & Swift, Phys Rev A (1992)

26
Compare granular experiment to Swift-Hohenberg model Experiment Swift-Hohenberg DISORDERED SQUARES Granular noise is: -- 10 4 times the k B T noise in Rayleigh-Bénard convection [Wu, Ahlers, & Cannell, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1995)] --10 times the k B T noise in Rayleigh-Bénard convection near T c [ Oh & Ahlers, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2003 )] Goldman, Swift, & Swinney Phys. Rev. Lett. (Jan. 2004) = ( – c )/ c

27
Segregation: separate particles of different sizes

28
f* = f x [(layer depth)/g] 1/2 Kink: boundary between regions of opposite phase -- layer on one side of kink moves down while other side moves up flat with kinks OSCILLONS

29
Kink: a phase discontinuity 3-dimensional MD simulation =6.5 container x/d 0 100 200 kink Moon, Shattuck, Bizon, Goldman, Swift, Swinney Phys. Rev. E 65, 011301 (2001)

30
Convection toward a kink falling rising This is NOT a snapshot: the small black arrows show the displacement of a particle in 2 periods (2/f )

31
Larger particles rise to top (Brazil nut effect) and are swept by convection to the kink ® this segregation is intrinsic to the dynamics (not driven by air or wall interaction) glass particles dia. = 4d bronze particles dia. = d

32
Moon, Goldman, Swift, Swinney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) kink particle trajectory oscillating kink EXPERIMENT: controlled motion of the kink harvests the larger particles black glass dia. = 4d bronze d = 0.17 mm 247 cycles 566 cycles t = 0

33
Dynamics of a granular lattice Granular lattice: like an equilibrium lattice of harmonically coupled balls and springs Lindemann melting criterion supports the coupled lattice picture Question: Would continuum pattern forming systems, e.g., Faraday waves in oscillating liquid layers, Rayleigh-Bénard convection patterns, falling liquid columns, Taylor-Couette flow, viscous film fingers, … exhibit similar lattice dispersion and melting phenomena?

34
Noise Near the onset of granular patterns, noise drives hydrodynamic-like modes, which are well described by the Swift-Hohenberg equation.

35
Harvesting large particles Segregation of bi-disperse mixtures has been achieved for particles with Diameter ratios: 1.1 – 12 Mass ratios: 0.4 - 2500

36
END

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Lattice Vibrations, Part I

Lattice Vibrations, Part I

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on measurement of price elasticity of demand Ppt on latest technology in electronics and instrumentation Ppt on total parenteral nutrition administration Free ppt on brain machine interface articles Ppt on effective english teaching Ppt on regional trade agreements japan Ppt on anti bullying Ppt on old english literature Ppt on mammals and egg laying animals wikipedia Ppt on stars and planets