Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byGlen Ledington Modified over 2 years ago

1
What do RHIC data tell us about thermalisation? J-Y Ollitrault Journée thématique IPN Orsay, 2 juin 2006

2
Outline Which data can be interpreted in a fairly model- independent way, and why? (based on Bhalerao Blaizot Borghini & JYO, nucl-th/0508045) The centrality dependence of elliptic flow shows deviations from ideal hydro (taking into account fluctuations in initial conditions, Bhalerao & JYO, in preparation) Can we model deviations from ideal hydro? A preliminary transport calculation (Clément Gombeaud & JYO, work in progress)

3
Good probe of thermalisation: Elliptic flow v 2 Interactions among the produced particles: Pressure gradients generate positive elliptic flow v 2 (v 4 smaller, but also measured)

4
In hydro, at a time of order R/c s where R = transverse size c s = sound velocity When does elliptic flow build up? For a given equation of state, v2 scales roughly like the initial eccentricity ε

5
What is the density then? Assuming particle number conservation, the density at t=R/c s is It varies little with centrality and system size

6
How can we probe hydro behaviour? (= thermalisation) We want to measure the equation of state so that we should not assume any value of c s a priori The robust method is to compare systems with the same density, hence the same c s, and check that they have the same v 2 /ε Au-Au collisions and Cu-Cu collisions at midrapidity, and moderate centralities do a good job The rapidity dependence of v 2 is interesting, but interpretation is more difficult since the density varies significantly with rapidityv v 4 is also interesting (not covered in this talk) Bhalerao Blaizot Borghini & JYO, nucl-th/0508045

7
Why does this really probe thermalisation? Varying centrality and system size, the density does not change, but the number of collisions per particle ~ σ/S (dN/dy) does ! Notation: # of collisions=1/K where K=Knudsen number. The hydro limit is K<<1. If not satisfied, one expects smaller v 2 than in hydro.

8
Problems with RHIC data Au +Au 200 GeV STAR preliminary Gang Wang, Quark Matter 2005, nucl-ex/0510034 Results depend on the method used for the analysis

9
Eccentricity fluctuations A nice idea by the PHOBOS collaboration, nucl-ex/0510031 Positions of participant nucleons at the time when the collision occurs are randomly distributed throughout the overlap area. The « participant eccentricity » ε p differs from the « standard eccentricity» ε s due to statistical fluctuations v 2 {ZDC-SMD} should scale like ε s V 2 {2} should scale like Bhalerao & JYO, in preparation

10
STAR data revisited With the proper scaling by ε, the discrepancy between methods disappears: Little room for « nonflow effects » v 2 /ε increases with # of collisions per particle : clearly NOT HYDRO

11
Modelling deviations from ideal hydro Need a theory that goes to ideal hydro in some limit. First method: viscous hydrodynamics (Teaney, Muronga et: al, Romatschke et al, Heinz et al, Pal) : this is a general approach to small deviations from ideal hydro, but quantitative results are not yet available Second method: Boltzmann equation. Drawback: applies only to a dilute system (not to a dense system like the RHIC liquid). Advantage: directly involves microscopic physics through collisional cross-sections

12
What is the literature on the subject? Molnar, Huovinen, nucl-th/0404065

13
Our approach to the Boltzmann equation (C. Gombeaud, stage M1) Two-dimensions (three later) Massless particles (mass later) Billiard-ball-type calculation, but with Lorentz contraction taken into account: this ensures Lorentz invariance of the number of collisions. N particles of size r in a box of surface S: Dilute system if r<

14
Test of the algorithm: thermalisation in a static system Initial conditions: monoenergetic particles. Relaxation time = mean free path= tau=S/(Nr)

15
Elliptic flow: preliminary results Initial conditions: homogeneous density inside a rectangular box. Particle then escape freely from the box. Two dimensionless parameters D=r sqrt(N/S) 1/K=R/λ

16
Time evolution of elliptic flow

17
Variation with number of collisions

18
Perspectives Study the pt-dependence (saturation of v 2 ) Hexadecupole flow v 4 Generalize to three dimensions with longitudinal expansion Obtain the value of K by comparing the shape of the curve with data?

Similar presentations

OK

Hydrodynamics, flow, and flow fluctuations Jean-Yves Ollitrault IPhT-Saclay Hirschegg 2010: Strongly Interacting Matter under Extreme Conditions International.

Hydrodynamics, flow, and flow fluctuations Jean-Yves Ollitrault IPhT-Saclay Hirschegg 2010: Strongly Interacting Matter under Extreme Conditions International.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on action words for grade 1 Ppt on fast food retailing in india Download ppt on global warming Ppt on power generation by speed breaker symbols Download ppt on coordinate geometry for class 9th physics Presentations open ppt online Ppt on environmental sustainability Ppt on polynomials in maths what does mode Ppt on shell scripting commands Viewer ppt online reader