Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) New Mexico (Bartlett) UCFA Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: " 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) New Mexico (Bartlett) UCFA Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%"— Presentation transcript:

1  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) New Mexico (Bartlett) UCFA Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

2  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

3  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

4  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

5  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault

6  1 ’s share of that remainder is 1/4=.25

7  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault  1 ’s share of that remainder is 1/4= $480,000 = $120,000

8  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

9  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

10  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault

11  3 ’s share of that remainder is 3/4=.75

12  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) =40% total remaining  s’ fault  3 ’s share of that remainder is 3/4= $480,000 = $360,000

13  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

14  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

15  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

16  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

17  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

18  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

19  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

20  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA : uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

21  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

22  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

23  1 ’s share of that remainder is 10/60=1/6

24  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  1 ’s share of that remainder is 10/60=1/6 1/6 * $480,000 = $80,000

25  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

26  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

27  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

28  3 ’s share of that remainder is 30/60=1/2

29  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  3 ’s share of that remainder is 30/60= ½ ½ * $480,000 = $240,000

30  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

31  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 = $240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 $240,000 + Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent

32  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault

33  ’s share of that remainder is 20/60=1/3

34  1 (10%) +  3 (30%) +  (20%) = 60% total remaining parties’ fault  ’s share of that remainder is 20/60=1/3 1/3 * $480,000 = $160,000

35  1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) retains J&S: uncollectable shares allocated among remaining  s $120,000 + $120,000 =$240,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $360,000 = $720,000 $240,000 New Mexico (Bartlett) discards J&S:  absorbs  2 ’s share $120,000 $480,000 $360,000$240,000 + $480,000 = $720,000 UCFA: uncollectable shares allocated among all remaining parties $120,000 + $80,000 = $200,000 $480,000 $360,000 + $240,000 = $600,000 $240,000 + $160,000 = $400,000 Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%  ’s damages = $1,200,000  2 is missing or insolvent


Download ppt " 1 ’ s Share  2 ’ s Share  3 ’ s Share  ’ s Share Illinois (Coney) New Mexico (Bartlett) UCFA Fault allocation:  =20%,  1 =10%,  2 =40%,  3 =30%"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google