Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates April 16, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and State Assessment Consultant.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates April 16, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and State Assessment Consultant."— Presentation transcript:

1 Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates April 16, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and State Assessment Consultant

2 Agenda, Webinar #10 Accountability – Final decisions

3 ACCOUNTABILITY

4 2014 Development Final decisions ELL inclusion Accountability sessions

5 2014 Ratings Labels Rating based on 4 Indexes

6

7

8 Index 1: Student Achievement Index 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students  Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.  Student Groups: All Students.  Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory).  STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments (15 total):  Reading I; Reading II; Reading III  Writing I; Writing II; Writing III  Algebra l; Geometry; Algebra ll  Biology; Chemistry; Physics  World Geography; World History; US History  English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests):  ELLs in US schools Years 1-3 excluded  ELLs in US schools Year 4 or more included 2014  Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.  Student Groups: All Students.  Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory).  STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments (5 total):  English l; English ll  Algebra l  Biology  US History  English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests):  ELLs in US schools Year 1 excluded  ELLs in US schools Year 2 and beyond included

9 Index 1: Student Achievement  English I and II from Spring  Include Reading I and II from July 2013 and December 2013 Substitute Assessments EOCs (PSAT, PLAN, SAT, ACT, AP)  Standard at Meeting Final Level II (CCR Standard)  Counted as PASSER for Index I  Counted as Meeting CCR Standard for Index IV  Not used in Index 2 and 3

10

11 Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.  By Subject Area: Reading and Mathematics  One point for Met progress level  Two points for Exceeded progress level  Progress Measures by Subject Area and School Type  New for 2014:  No Index 2 for High Schools (9-12 campuses)  Inclusion STAAR-Modified, STAAR-Alt  Inclusion of ELL Students Index 2: Student Progress

12 Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.  New for 2014:  Students who skip grades included  Students who transition from Spanish to English in mathematics included  ELL Denials: Students whose parent(s) have denied ELL services included  Considered as Non-ELL student for Index 2 Index 2: Student Progress

13

14 2013  Points based on STAAR performance:  Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II  By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.  Student Groups:  Economically Disadvantaged  Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from 2012 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups  Points based on STAAR performance:  Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II  Level III advanced performance: Two points for each percent of tests at the Level III advanced performance standard.  By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.  Student Groups:  Economically Disadvantaged  Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from 2013…groups must have 25 tests in reading AND math  Inclusion of ELL Students

15

16 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 2013  Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for:  Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups; or  Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index.  RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school  Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for:  Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups; or  Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index.  RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.  STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.  College ready graduates.

17 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Indicator All Students African Amer. Amer. Indian AsianHispanic Pacific Islander White Two or More Races ELL Special Ed. Total Points Max. Points STAAR Score STAAR % Met Final Level ll on Two or More Tests 29%16%40%23%38%36% STAAR Score (STAAR total points divided by maximum points)30 Graduation Score (Gr. 9-12) 4-yr. graduation rate84.3%78.8% 91.6%86.0%44.2%69.8% yr. graduation rate85.1%78.8%80.0%92.1%84.0%48.9%77.5% Highest Graduation Total Graduation Score (best of total graduation points divided by maximum points)78.0 RHSP/DAP Score 4-yr. graduation Percent RHSP/DAP 82.7%76.4%83.6%83.0% RHSP/DAP Score (best of total RHSP/DAP points divided by maximum points)81.4 Postsecondary/College-Ready Graduates Score College-Ready Graduates subject (ELA & Math) 82.0%72.0%78.0%89.0% College-Ready Score (total points divided by maximum points)80.2 Overall Index Score STAAR Score30.0 Multiply by Weight Graduation Score78.0 RHSP/DAP Score81.4 College-Ready Score80.2 Index Score (sum of weighted index scores)

18

19 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness STAAR Level II Final Performance  Percent Met Final Level II on Two or More Assessments Weighting of Indicators: Post-Secondary Indicator:  Percent Met Criteria on ELA AND MATH IndicatorWeight STAAR Component25% Graduation25% Graduation Plan25% Post-Secondary Indicators25%

20 Rating Labels: AEA 2014 System Standard accountability labels: Met Alternative Standard Improvement Required

21 Index 4 Targets Elementary-12 Middle School-13 High School-18 District--13 Districts, high schools, and multi-grade campuses- 56…..changed to 57 per April 25 th posting. STAAR ComponentAll four components

22 Distinction Designations 2013 Distinction Designation  Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent: Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparison group earn a distinction designation.  Student Progress based on Index 2  Academic Achievement in:  Reading/ELA  Mathematics 2014 Distinction Designation  Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent: Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparison group  Student Progress (based on Index 2)  Closing Performance Gaps (based on Index 3)  Academic Achievement in:  Reading/English Language Arts  Mathematics  Science  Social Studies  Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness: House Bill 5 (83 rd Texas Legislature, 2013) expanded distinctions for districts and campuses for attainment of postsecondary readiness Criteria must include indicators based on percentages of students who:  Achieve college-readiness standards on STAAR;  Earn nationally/internationally recognized business/industry certification;  Complete a coherent sequence of CTE courses;  Complete dual credit or a postsecondary course for local credit;  Achieve college readiness standards on SAT, ACT, PSAT, or ACT-PLAN;  Earn college credit based on AP/IB performance.

23

24 Accountability Ratings and Distinction Designations 2013 and 2014 Accountability Rating (Districts and Campuses) 2013 Distinction Designations2014 Distinction Designations Met Standard Campuses Only Student Progress Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA Mathematics Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness Campuses Only Student Progress Closing Performance Gaps Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA Mathematics Science Social Studies Improvement RequiredN/A

25 System Safeguards Safeguard Measures and Targets:  Reporting system disaggregates performance by student group, performance level, and subject area.  Performance rates are calculated from the assessment results used to calculate Index 1: Student Achievement.  2013 targets for the disaggregated system-safeguard results:  STAAR performance target corresponds to Index 1 (50%);  STAAR participation target required by federal accountability (95%);  Federal graduation rate targets and improvement calculations for 4-year rate (78%) and 5-year rate (83%); and  Federal limit on use of alternate assessments (1% and 2%).

26 26 IndicatorEntity All Students African Amer. Amer. Indian AsianHispanic Pacific Islander White Two or More Races Eco. Disadv. ELLSpecial Ed. Performance Rates* Reading State55% Federal79% n/a 79%n/a79%n/a79% Mathematics State55% Federal79% n/a 79%n/a79%n/a79% Writing55% Science55% Social Studies55% Participation Rates Reading95% Mathematics95% Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets) 4-year80% 5-year85% District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results Reading Modified2%Not Applicable Alternate1%Not Applicable Mathematics Modified2%Not Applicable Alternate1%Not Applicable Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting 2014 Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets * Targets for 2014 correspond to the performance target for Index 1: Student Achievement.

27 Secure Environment Staging Data Validation Monitoring in ISAM Campus pairings for accountability available in late April

28 STUDENT ASSESSMENT

29 ELL progress measure

30


Download ppt "Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates April 16, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and State Assessment Consultant."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google