1. Formative assessment and contingency in the regulation of learning processes
Contribution to a Symposium entitled “Toward a theory of classroom assessment as the regulation of learning” at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 2014.
Dylan Wiliam

2. Issues in defining formative assessment
Theorization and definition
Possible variables
Category (instruments, outcomes, functions)
Beneficiaries (teachers, learners)
Timescale (months, weeks, days, hours, minutes)
Consequences (outcomes, instruction, decisions)
Theory of action (what gets formed?)

3. FA has included SRL for years
“Formative assessment is concerned with how judgments about the quality of student responses (performances, pieces, or works) can be used to shape and improve the student's competence by short- circuiting the randomness and inefficiency of trial-and-error learning.” (Sadler 1989 p. 120)
“The indispensable conditions for improvement are that the student comes to hold a concept of quality roughly similar to that held by the teacher, is able to monitor continuously the quality of what is being produced during the act of production itself, and has a repertoire of alternative moves or strategies from which to draw at any given point. In other words, students have to be able to judge the quality of what they are producing and be able to regulate what they are doing during the doing of it.” (p. 121)

4. Formative assessment as assessment
Assessment is a procedure for making inferences (Cronbach, 1971)
The formative-summative distinction is a classification of the kinds of inferences being made
Summative: inferences regarding an individual’s current, or future, status
Formative: inferences regarding the kinds of instructional activities likely to improve learning
No such thing as a formative or a summative assessment

5. An inclusive definition
An assessment functions formatively:
“to the extent that evidence about student achievement is elicited, interpreted, and used by teachers, learners, or their peers, to make decisions about the next steps in instruction that are likely to be better, or better founded, than the decisions they would have taken in the absence of the evidence that was elicited.” (Black & Wiliam, 2009 p. 9)

6. Consequences of the definition
Anyone—teacher, peer, learner, can be the agent of formative assessment;
The focus is on decisions, rather than data;
The next steps in instruction indicated may not be the best, or even successful;
The assessment need not actually change the decision made.
And therefore, formative does not mean optimal, or even good

7. FA and the regulation of learning processes
Formative assessment is therefore concerned with the creation of, and capitalization upon, moments of contingency in the regulation of learning processes
Kinds of regulation (Allal, 1988)
proactive
interactive
retroactive
asynchronous
synchronous

8. Unpacking formative assessment
Where the learner is going
Where the learner is
How to get there
Engineering effective discussions, tasks, and activities that elicit evidence of learning
Providing feedback that moves learners forward
Teacher
Clarifying, sharing and understanding learning intentions
Peer
Activating students as learning
resources for one another
Activating students as owners of their own learning
Learner