Presentation on theme: "Errors and uncertainties in chemistry internal assessment"— Presentation transcript:
1Errors and uncertainties in chemistry internal assessment The consideration and appreciation of the significance of the concepts of errors and uncertainties helps to develop skills of inquiry and thinking that are not only relevant to the group 4 experimental sciencesThe treatment of errors and uncertainties is directly relevant in the internal assessment criteria of:data collection and processing, (recording raw data and presenting processed data)conclusion and evaluation, aspects 1, 2 and 3 (concluding, evaluating procedure(s), and improving the investigation).
2Within internal assessment students should be able to do the following: make a quantitative record of uncertainty range (±)state the results of calculations to the appropriate number of significant figures.propagate uncertainties through a calculation so as to determine the uncertainties in calculated results and to state them as absolute and/or percentage uncertainties.
3Random and systematic errors Systematic errors arise from a problem in the experimental set-up that results in the measured values always deviating from the “true” value in the same direction, that is, always higher or always lower.Examples of causes of systematic error are miscalibration of a measuring device or poor insulation in calorimetry experiments.
4Random uncertainties or errors arise from the inadequacies or limitations in the instrument.
5Random uncertainties What is the length of the object? The ruler has scale markings every inch.You must divide each inch to 10 equal parts w/ your eyes and estimate the length of the object to the nearest 1/10 of an inch.ANSWER: 1.5 or 1.4 or 1.6.We’re not certain about the first place after the decimal place.Hence we should record this value as 1.5 ± 0.1.
61.5 ± 0.1 Random uncertainties uncertainty of the measurement due to the limitation of the instrument
71.5 ± 0.1 in Random uncertainties Means that the true value can be in between 1.4 and 1.6
8No, you can estimate only ONE DIGIT, NOT TWO! Random uncertaintiesWhat is the length of the object?1.52 in ???No, you can estimate only ONE DIGIT, NOT TWO!
9Uncertainties in measurements… form the random errors in the investigationswill always be determined as 1/10th of the LEAST CERTAIN DIGIT on the MANUAL EQUIPMENTS!!!
10Uncertainties in measurements… For uncertainties of the digital equipments,± the smallest digit that could be measured on that equipment.2.000 ±0.001 g
11While making measurements… always remember to estimate ONE MORE DIGIT!!!
12total # of significant figures in that measurement Random uncertaintiesindigit we’re certain ofdigit we estimated2 sfTotal # of digits that we’re certain of + the # of the digit estimated (1)=total # of significant figures in that measurement
13Significant figures(carry meaning contributing to its precision)… Total # of digits that we’re certain of# of the digit estimated (1)+
14Can we eliminate the random errors? No, we can only reduce them.the uncertainty is reduced, but it can never be completely eliminated. When recording raw data, estimated uncertainties should always be indicated for all measurements
15How can we reduce the random errors? repeat measurements, 5 TRIALS AT LEAST!use more precise measuring equipment (?????)MOST EFFECTIVE!!!
16Learning check What is the length of the object on both rulers? top Ruler: ± 0.1 inbottom Ruler: ± 0.01inWhich ruler is more precise?
17More precise equipment is… the one that gives more digits to the right of the decimal point in measurements.
19Precision vs Accuracy in measurements The theoretical value of R (ideal gas law constant)=8.314 J/molKStudent A found it as 8.34 ± 0.03 J/molKStudent B found it as ± J/molKWhich one is more accurate and which one is more precise?
20Precision vs Accuracy in measurements Student A found it as 8.34 ± 0.03 J/molK(more accurate)Student B found it as ± J/molK(more precise)
21Accuracyis usually calculated as “PERCENTAGE ERROR.”
22AccuracyLet’s determine the accuracy of the student A’s and B’s results by calculating the % errors:8.314= %8.314= 2.39 % (less accurate)
24C. Estimating the uncertainity ( propogation of errors ) DeviceExampleUncertainityAnalogue scaleRuler,voltmeter,ammeter ,graduated cylinder, thermometer, watch, stopwatch,meters with moving pointers.1/10th of the smallest scale divisionDigital scaleTop-pan balances , digital meters,voltmeter,pH meterthe smallest scale divisionReflex time of a person0.2 secondsHand out 1) the worksheet about determining uncert 2) the sig fig papers. 3) the calculations about sf