We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarquise Lummis
Modified over 2 years ago
Criminal Justice Today Chapter 11 Sentencing Criminal Justice
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Sentencing Sentencing—the imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. Most sentencing decisions are made by a judge, though in some cases, especially death-eligible cases, juries are involved. Traditional Sentencing Options Imprisonment Fines Probation Death Goals of Sentencing- Five goals influence modern sentencing practices: Retribution- the act of taking revenge on a perpetrator. “Eye for an eye” & “Just desserts” Incapacitation- the use of imprisonment, or other means, to reduce the likelihood that an offender will be capable of committing future offenses Requires only restraint (prison, mutilation, amputation of limbs)
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Deterrence- a more rational goal of criminal sentencing that seeks to inhibit criminal behavior through fear of punishment. It demonstrates that crime is not worthwhile. Overall goal is crime prevention. There are two types of deterrence: Specific- reducing likelihood of repeat offenses General- influence future behavior of those not yet arrested for offenses Rehabilitation- the attempt to reduce the number of crimes by changing the behavior of offenders. Education, training, and counseling are some of the vehicles used. The ultimate goal is to reduce the number of offenses Restoration- goal of criminal sentencing that attempts to make the victim “whole again.” Crime is a violation of a person as well as the state Restorative justice addresses the needs of the victim Sentencing options focus primarily on restitution payments
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Indeterminate Sentencing … A model of criminal punishment that encourages rehabilitation via the use of general and relatively unspecific sentences. Indeterminate sentencing allows judges to have a wide range of discretion. Sentences are often given in a range, i.e., “ten to twenty years.” Probation and parole are options. Degrees of guilt can be taken into account. Behavior of the offender during incarceration is the main determining factor in release decisions. A few states employ a partially indeterminate sentencing model. Judge sets maximum time. Minimum set by law. Criticisms of Indeterminate Sentencing- gives inadequate attention to: Proportionality- sentence should be proportional to crime Equity- sentence should same for offenders regardless of their personal/social characteristics Social debt- offender’s criminal history should be taken into account Gain time- time deducted for participation in a program Good time- time deducted for good behavior in prison
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Structured Sentencing..model of criminal punishment in which an offender is given a fixed term of imprisonment that may be reduced by good time or gain time. Determinate sentencing Offender is given a fixed sentence length. The sentence can be reduced by “good time.” The use of parole is eliminated. Voluntary/advisory sentencing guidelines Recommended sentencing policies that are not required by law but serve as guides for judges. “Sentences” are based on past practices Commission-created presumptive sentencing Proper sentence is presumed to fall within the range authorized by sentencing guidelines. If judges deviate from guidelines, they must provide written justifications. Sentencing guidelines provide for some review, usually by an appellate court.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Presumptive Sentencing Guidelines The federal government and 16 states now employ sentencing guidelines. Guideline jurisdictions generally allow judges to take into account aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Aggravating Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that make it more grave than the average instance of that crime (cruelty, etc.) Call for a tougher sentence. Mitigating Circumstances relating to the commission of a crime that may be considered to reduce the blameworthiness of the defendant (cooperation w/authorities, surrender, good character, etc) Call for a lesser sentence Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 established presumptive sentencing for federal offenders and addressed truth in sentencing. Truth in Sentencing- close correspondence between sentence imposed and actual time served in prison Melendez v. U. S. (1996)—judges can’t accept plea bargains that would have resulted in sentences lower than the minimum required by law for a particular type of offense.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved The defendant induced others to participate in the commission of the offense. The offense was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel. The defendant was armed with or used a deadly weapon during the crime. The defendant committed the offense to avoid or prevent a lawful arrest or to escape from custody. The offense was committed for hire. The offense was committed against a current or former law enforcement or corrections officer while engaged in the performance of official duties or because of the past exercise of official duties. The defendant took advantage of a position of trust or confidence to commit the offense. Aggravating Circumstances
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved The defendant has no record of criminal convictions punishable by more than 60 days of imprisonment. The defendant has made substantial or full restitution. The defendant has been a person of good character or has had a good reputation in the community. The defendant aided in the apprehension of another felon or testified truthfully on behalf} of the prosecution. The defendant acted under strong provocation, or the victim was a voluntary participant in the criminal activity or otherwise consented to it. The offense was committed under duress, coercion, threat, or compulsion that was insufficient to constitute a defense but that significantly reduced the defendant’s culpability. At the time of the offense, the defendant was suffering from a mental or physical condition that was insufficient to constitute a defense but that significantly reduced the defendant’s culpability. Mitigating Circumstances
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Mandatory Sentencing & Three Strikes Laws Mandatory sentences are a form of structured sentencing that allows NO leeway in the sentence required for a crime. Takes away judicial discretion Results in less plea-bargaining and more trials. Have led officials to make earlier and more selective arrest, charging, and diversion decisions. Three Strikes Laws Some states have “Three Strikes Laws,” which require mandatory sentences (sometimes life without parole) when convicted of third serious felony. The intent is to deter known and potentially violent offenders and to incapacitate repeat criminals for long periods of time. Innovations in Sentencing Some judges are paying closer attention to alternative sentencing strategies. Judges in certain jurisdictions have begun to use the wide discretion in sentencing available to them and impose truly unique sentences, many of which involve shaming.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Alternate Sentencing: Approaches and Diversion 1.Diversion: Official suspension of criminal or juvenile proceedings against an alleged offender at any point after a recorded justice system intake, but before the entering of a judgment, and referral of that person to a treatment or care program administered by a non-justice or private agency. 2.Offender registry: Requiring an offender to register with the community when committing a certain type of violation (such as a sexual crime). Once a person is required to register, it can be an additional crime if they move and do not register or notify authorities. 3.Alternative sanctions: Innovative individualized sentence given to an offender based on that particular crime. For example (as pictured above) having offenders of noise ordinances listen to classical music. Other examples include having an offender clean up property they damaged, having an offender wear a label (such as a bumper sticker on a car for those convicted of DWI) or write a letter of apology to a victim. 4.Home detention: Requiring an offender to stay home and not leave the property. 5.Drug treatment: The offender has to be tested for drugs/alcohol on a regular basis. 6.Psychological counseling: Having to attend meetings and sessions to help treat a particular problem (such as anger management).
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Presentence Investigation (PSI) Report PSI Reports provide judges with the backgrounds on convicted defendants awaiting sentencing. Typically, prepared by probation or parole officers. Include a sentencing recommendation. Presentence Investigation Report
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved 12 Figure 12.2 Information in a Presentence Report
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved The Victim – Forgotten No Longer A grassroots movement began in the 1970s. Today, victims’ assistance programs help victims understand the system and their rights, get counseling, file civil suits, and recoup financial losses. Victim Compensation Restorative justice programs provide the basis for victim compensation funds. States have legislation providing monetary payments to help certain victims. The USA PATRIOT Act provides compensation for victims of terrorism and their families. Victim Impact Statements The victims’ rights movement also called for the use of victim impact statements before sentencing. These statements: Are generally in written form. Provide descriptions of losses, suffering, and trauma experienced by victims or their survivors. Are designed to help judges make sentencing decisions
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Crime Victims’ Rights Act The Crime Victims’ Rights Act is part of the Justice For All Act of 2004. It grants victims of federal crimes the right to: Be reasonably protected from the accused. Reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public proceeding involving the crime, or any release or escape of the accused. Be included in any such public proceeding. Be reasonably heard at any public proceeding involving release, plea, or sentencing. Confer with the federal prosecutor handling the case. Full and timely restitution as provided by law. Proceeding free from unreasonable delay. Be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Traditional Sanctions There are four traditional sanctions: Fines Probation Imprisonment Death A judge’s discretion to choose the sanction type varies depending on the structure of sentencing used within that particular jurisdiction.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Fines Fines are one of the oldest forms of sentencing. Fines may be used alone or in combination with another penalty. More than $1 billion in fines are collected nationwide each year. Arguments For Fill state coffers Lower tax burden Deny criminals the proceeds of their criminal activity. Inexpensive to implement. Can be made proportionate to the severity of the offense. Arguments Against Too mild of a punishment. Offenders often serve no time. Discriminate against the poor. Can be difficult to collect. Day Fines- proportional to the severity of the crime and the financial resources of the offender. Some critics of fines propose using the Scandinavian system of day fines.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved 17 French Revolution Dark Ages Greek and Roman Societies Biblical Israel Capital Punishment
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved The Death Penalty Capital punishment=death penalty. It is the most extreme of all possible sanctions and is reserved only for especially repugnant crimes (known as capital offenses). Capital punishment is a sentencing option is 35 states and the federal government. States vary considerably with regard to the number of death sentences given and the number of executions Methods of imposing death vary by state. Most use lethal injection. Electrocution, hanging, gas chamber, and firing squad are still on the books as a option in at least one state. Today, the average time before execution is 12 years and 9 months. Most of the delay is due to appeals. All death penalty cases get one automatic appeal. Beyond that, inmates can receive more appeal by filing writs of habeas corpus, an order directing anyone holding a prisoner to bring him before a judicial officer to determine the lawfulness of the imprisonment. Baze v. Rees (2008)- Capital punishment protocol does not violate 8th Amendment as it does not create a substantial risk of pain, torture, or lingering death.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Court-Ordered Executions Carried Out in the United States, 1930- 2008 FIGURE 11–3 Court-ordered executions carried out in the United States, 1930–2008.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved Abolitionist and Retentionist Positions on Capital Punishment Arguments for Retention Revenge—Only after execution can survivors begin to heal psychologically Just desserts—Some people deserve to die for what they did Protection—Once executed, the person cannot commit another crime Arguments for Abolition Has been used on innocent people and may be again Not an effective deterrent Imposition is arbitrary and discriminatory Far too expensive Reduces society to the level of the criminal Doesn’t deter offenders
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved The Death Penalty and Innocence Claims of innocence are being partially addressed by recently passed state laws that mandate DNA testing of all death row inmates in situations where DNA might help establish guilt or innocence. The Innocence Protection Act (2004) provides federal funds to help analyze DNA at crime labs throughout the country. The Death Penalty Information Center claims that 133 people in 25 states were freed from death row between 1973 and 2009 after it was determined that they were innocent. FIGURE 11–4 Number of DNA-based exonerations by state since 1989.
© 2013 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 All Rights Reserved The Death Penalty, Mental Capacity, & Age People with very low IQs (mentally challenged) cannot be executed People with mental diseases may be executed as long as they know why they’re on death row & understand the punishment they face People who were under 18 when they committed the crime cannot be executed
Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE TODAY, 10E© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc by Dr. Frank Schmalleger Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Sentencing CHAPTER.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 9 - Sentencing.
© Prentice Hall 2008 Pearson Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, NJ Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger 1 Seminar Unit.
Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Test to the 21st Century Frank Schamalleger Sentencing Chapter 11 Copyright ©2011, 2009, 2007, 2005 by Pearson.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE A Brief Introduction, 6/E by Frank Schmalleger ©2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter.
Introduction to Criminal Justice Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Nine Bohm and Haley.
© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All Rights Reserved Schmalleger, Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 10e.
Dr. Terry M. Mors, Ed.D. © Mors Copyright 2010 Sentencing Sentencing—the imposition of a penalty on a convicted criminal following an impartial.
Chapter 10 Sentencing. © 2003 Prentice Hall, Inc. 2 Sentencing Goals of Sentencing retribution incapacitation deterrence rehabilitation restoration.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE A Brief Introduction, 5/E by Frank Schmalleger ©2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Sentencing.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections Chapter 15 Street Law Text pp
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE TODAY, 10E© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc by Dr. Frank Schmalleger Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Pretrial, Trials,
SENTENCING. Government determines sanction range for each offense Judge or jury responsible for sentencing Broad range of potential criminal sentences.
Punishment & Sentencing Chapter 10 in Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
Chapter 15 Sentencing Options. Questions Why do we sentence? Should the punishment fit the crime? or, Should the punishment fit the criminal?
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON A MERICAN GOVERNMENT HOLT 1 The U.S. Legal System Section 1: U.S. Law Section 2: The Criminal Justice System Section 3: Corrections.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101: Chapter 10 Sentencing, Appellate Review, and the Penalty of Death.
Chapter 19 Sentencing and Punishment. Sentencing The imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. Modern sentencing practices are influenced.
Punishment and Sentencing Chapter 13. Physical torture Branding Whipping Death Past Punishments.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial Chapter 13 Street Law Text pp
BREAK IT DOWN Getting into the rhythm of CJ 299 – Associate Capstone projects Jennifer Wills.
Unit 7 Sentencing, Trial, Pre-Trial Professor Jennifer Wills Adapted from Criminal Justice Today By Frank Schmalleger 1.
Chapter 9: Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty.
Chapter 10 Sentencing. © 2003 Prentice Hall, Inc. 2 Traditional Sentencing Options imprisonment fines probation death.
Chapter 9 Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections 1. Sentencing Options 2. Purposes of Punishment 3. Parole 4. Capital Punishment 5. Corrections.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 9 Punishment and Sentencing.
Essential Questions: What are the appropriate methods of punishing citizens for noncompliance with laws? Why should individuals accused of crimes be presumed.
Criminal Justice Chapter 9 Presentation Assignment By: Ciara Hairston & Kiya Holland May 4, 2012.
Chapter 11 SENTENCING AND SANCTIONS 1. Purpose of Criminal Sanctions Criminal Sanctions – A penalty imposed for violating accepted social norms. A sanction.
Criminal Law Sentencing Youth Justice May Sentencing The Goal of sentencing is Deterrence Rehabilitation Retribution Segregation Taking into account.
Welcome to CJ 101!! Kaplan University Professor Chad Rosa Unit 7.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
Sentence - punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime. The goal or purpose of a sentence ◦ Protection of public ◦ Retribution.
Unit Seven Seminar Sentencing Chapter Eleven Reading.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Sentencing A declaration, or decision, by a Court of Law to punish a convicted criminal.
Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing. The History of Punishment From Exile to Fines, Torture to Forfeiture Public Work and Transportation to the Colonies.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Chapter 3 Sentencing and the Correctional Process 1.
SENTENCE: punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing © 2015 Cengage Learning.
Sentencing and Corrections. Judges Options Suspended Sentence: Sentence is given but is not imposed until the defendant messes up again (arrested or violates.
Topic 10 Sentencing Topic 10 Sentencing. Topic 10 Sentencing Introduction to sentencing aims of sentencing types of sentences youth sentencing.
The end of the line…. Who decides? After the jury returns a verdict of guilty either…guilty The judge determines the sentence Or the jury gives a recommendation.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.