1. Summer Leadership Conference August 10, 2012 Dr. Susan Moxley, Superintendent

2. Elementary Results – Reading FCAT 2.0 District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 201 (=)213 (=)220 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (=)61 (=)60 (-1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 17 (-1)12 (=)15 (=)

3. Elementary Results – Reading FCAT 2.0 District Changes from 2011-2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 201 (=)213 (+2)220 (+1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (-3)61 (+5)60 (+1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 17 (+1)12 (-3)15 (-1)

7. Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Reading District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 224 (-1)231 (=)237 (=) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 56 (-1)56 (-2)54 (-1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 18 (-1)17(-1)17 (=)

8. Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Reading District Changes from 2011 to 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 224 (-1)231 (=)237 (+1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 56 (=)56 (=)54 (+4) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 18 (=)17(-1)17 (-1)

12. High School Results – FCAT 2.0 Reading District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 9Grade 10 239 (-1)241 (-3) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 9Grade 10 49 (-3)45 (-5) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 9Grade 10 18 (=)23 (+3)

13. High School Results – Reading FCAT 2.0 District Changes from 2011-2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 9Grade 10 239 (+1)241 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 9Grade 10 49 (+1)45 (=) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 9Grade 10 18 (-3)23 (+1)

16. Elementary Results – Math FCAT 2.0 District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 201 (-1)214 (-1)221 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (=)60 (=)55 (-2) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 18 (-2)18 (=)19 (=)

17. Elementary Results – Math FCAT 2.0 District Changes from 2011-2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 201 (+3)214 (+2)221 (+1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (+4)60 (+6)55 (+1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 18 (-4)18 (-4)19 (-1)

21. Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Math District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 225 (-2)234 (-2)241 (-2) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 51 (-2)52 (-4)52 (-5) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 22 (-1)22 (+2)23 (+1)

22. Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Math District Changes from 2011-2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 225 (-1)234 (=)241 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 51 (-1)52 (-2)52 (-4) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 22 (-2)22 (=)23 (+2)

26. Elementary Results – FCAT Writing Grade 4 Essay Score 3.2 (-.8)

27. Elementary Results – FCAT Writing Grade 4 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

28. Middle School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 8 Essay Score 3.2 (-.9)

29. Middle School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 8 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

30. High School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 10 Essay Score 3.3 (-.5)

31. High School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 10 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

32. Elementary Results – FCAT Science Grade 5 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

33. Middle School Results – FCAT Science Grade 8 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

34. 2011-2012 Winter Algebra 1 EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 392 State 391 Percent at Level 1 District 22% State 25% Percent => Level 3 District 46 State 44

35. 2011-2012 Spring Algebra 1 EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 400 State 402 Percent at Level 1 District 15% State 15% Percent => Level 3 District 56 (+3 from 2011) State 59

36. 2011-2012 Spring Geometry EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 48 State 49 Percent in Bottom Third District 36% State 35% Percent in Top Third District 27% State 34%

37. 2011-2012 Spring Biology EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 48 State 49 Percent in Bottom Third District 36% State 35% Percent in Top Third District 27% State 34%

38. School Grade Comparison School Grade Number of Schools by Year 2011 Projected by FLDOE in February 2012 2012 * A 211018 B 15913 C 6215 D 121 F 120 * Eight school grades still pending

40. R U C2 Ready? What is Required? Why is it Important How to do it? (Schools) How to do it? (Businesses) College and Career Readiness 21 st Century ThinkersShifts in PedagogyShifts in Partnerships Critical/Creative Thinkers Solution Seekers Innovators Collaborators Ethical Decision-Makers Effective Oral and Written Communicators Entrepreneurship Industry Demand Career fields not yet Created Technology not yet Developed Information not yet Discovered Learning Targets Level of Cognitive Demand Complex Text Non-Fiction Information Text Independence Project based learning A range of writing for a variety of purposes across all content areas Practical Internships After School and Youth Development Mentorships Adopt-a-School Program Teach-In

41. RUC2 Ready? WE WIN, TOGETHER! Lake County Schools Investing In Excellence! College and Career Readiness