Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byTommy Decourcy Modified over 2 years ago

1
**Poohsticks and hypothesis tests involving the binomial distribution**

L.O.: To carry out one-sided and two-sided hypothesis tests involving a binomial distribution Based upon an idea published in Teaching Statistics

2
**The House at Pooh Corner (by AA Milne)**

Pooh believes that he is able to predict which of two fir-cones will emerge first from under a bridge in a game of poohsticks. To see whether he is right, he devises a simple experiment in which he plays the game of poohsticks 12 times. He is able to correctly predict the winning fir-cone on 10 of these occasions. Test whether Pooh seems able to predict the winning fir cone using a 5% significance test.

3
**The House at Pooh Corner (by AA Milne)**

H0: p = 0.5 H1: p > 0.5 5% significance test Let X be the number of correct predictions. Under H0, X ~ B(12, 0.5). P(X ≥ 10) = 1 – P(X ≤ 9) = 1 – = or 1.93% As 1.93% < 5%, we can reject H0. There is evidence that Pooh has some ability to predict the winning fir-cone. This probability is called the p-value.

4
**One-sided and two-sided hypothesis tests**

Example: A drug is claimed to have a 40% success rate for curing patients with a certain disease. This is suspected of being an exaggeration. To test this claim, 16 people were treated with one drug and it was found that 3 were cured. Carry out a test at the 10% significance level. Solution: H0: p = H1: p < 0.4 10% significance test Let X be the number of people cured. Under Ho, X ~ B(16, 0.4) P(X ≤ 3) = or 6.51% (from tables). Since 6.51% < 10%, we can reject H0. There is weak evidence that the claimed success rate is exaggerated.

5
**One-sided and two-sided hypothesis tests**

Compare this example to the following slightly differently worded question:-

6
**One-sided and two-sided hypothesis tests**

Example: A drug is claimed to have a 40% success rate for curing patients with a certain disease. A doctor wishes to test whether this success rate is correct. The doctor gives the drug to 16 patients and finds that 3 are cured. Carry out a hypothesis test using a 10% level. Notice that we have the same data as before, i.e. 16 patients, 3 cured. However the hypotheses are now different: H0: p = 0.4 H1: p ≠ 0.4 This test is now called a two-sided (or two-tailed) test. We are essentially testing two different hypotheses, i.e. whether p < 0.4 and p > We use a 5% significance level for each test. Note: we are not indicating whether the success rate is believed to be too high or too low.

7
**One-sided and two-sided hypothesis tests**

Solution: H0: p = H1: p ≠ 0.4 10% significance test Let X be the number of people cured. Under Ho, X ~ B(16, 0.4) P(X ≤ 3) = or 6.51% (from tables). Since 6.51% > 5%, we cannot reject H0. There is no evidence that the claimed success rate is incorrect.

8
**One-sided and two-sided hypothesis tests**

Example: A magazine claims that 35% of all adults wear glasses. Anna wishes to test whether this figure is correct. She takes a sample of 18 adults and notices that exactly 13 of them wear glasses. Test at the 5% level whether the magazine claim is accurate. Solution: H0: p = H1: p ≠ (two-sided) Significance level: 5% Let X = number of people wearing glasses in sample.

9
**One-sided and two-sided hypothesis tests**

Under Ho, X ~ B(18, 0.35). P(X ≥ 13) = 1 – P(X ≤ 12) = = 1 – = or 0.14% As this test is two-sided we compare this probability with 2.5%. As 0.14% < 2.5%, we can reject H0. We have some evidence that the proportion of adults wearing glasses is not 35%.

10
**Use of a normal approximation**

Example: There are many complaints from passengers about the late running of trains on a particular route. The railway company claims that the proportion of trains that are delayed is 10%. The Railway Passengers’ Association conducts a survey of a random sample of 200 trains and finds that 27 are delayed. Test at the 5% level whether the railway company is underestimating the proportion of trains that are delayed.

11
**Use of a normal approximation**

Solution: H0: p = 0.1 H1: p > (one-sided test) Significance level: 5% Let X be the number of trains in the sample that are delayed. Under H0, X ~ B(200, 0.1). But X ≈ N[200 × 0.1, 200 × 0.1 × 0.9] = N[20, 18]. P(X ≥ 27) = P(X ≥ 26.5) = Continuity correction

12
**Use of a normal approximation**

Conclusion: Since 6.28% > 5%, we cannot reject H0. There is no evidence that the train company is understating the proportion of delayed trains.

Similar presentations

OK

CHAPTER 15: Tests of Significance: The Basics Lecture PowerPoint Slides The Basic Practice of Statistics 6 th Edition Moore / Notz / Fligner.

CHAPTER 15: Tests of Significance: The Basics Lecture PowerPoint Slides The Basic Practice of Statistics 6 th Edition Moore / Notz / Fligner.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on effect of global warming on weather alaska Ppt on bionics contact Download ppt on mind controlled robotic arms manufacturers Ppt on liquid crystal display Ppt on power system stability analysis Edit ppt on ipad 2 Download ppt on pulse code modulation pdf Ppt on carburetor systems Hrm ppt on recruitment plan Ppt on surface area and volume of frustum