We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeslie Evans
Modified over 3 years ago
© Milberg USING THE LAW TO PROTECT YOUR FUNDS ASSETS: The Role of Institutional Investors in U.S. Shareholder Litigation Prepared for: The Tel Aviv Institutional Investor Conference May 24, 2010 Todd Kammerman, Esq. Associate Benjamin Kaufman, Esq. Partner
© Milberg Protection of Future Income Litigation to Prevent or Recover Institutional Investor Losses through: Securities Litigation; Derivative Litigation; and Transactional Litigation
© Milberg Securities Fraud Class Action Cases in the United States
© Milberg This Court has long recognized that meritorious private actions to enforce federal antifraud securities laws are an essential supplement to criminal prosecutions and civil enforcement actions brought, respectively, by the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). -- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the opinion of the Supreme Court in Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308, 313 (2007), which was litigated by Milberg LLP
© Milberg Traditional Securities Class Action Litigation Historically, as fiduciaries, institutional investors have actively sought to recover fund losses due to fraud
© Milberg Institutional Investors Role Private and public funds dominate the market and have vested interest in: Maintaining integrity of financial markets Assuring corporate accountability Maximizing returns Increasingly stepping forward to seek recoveries for losses due to securities fraud Fulfill fiduciary duties to take action when necessary Serve as Lead Plaintiff and/or Class Representative
© Milberg U.S. Securities Class Actions with Union/Public Pension Fund As Lead Plaintiff Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers 2008 Securities Litigation Study (April 2009) and PricewaterhouseCoopers 2009 Securities Litigation Study (April 2010) Final 2009 data was not available; the full-year projections were based upon filings through June 30, 2009.
© Milberg U.S. Securities Class Actions with Any Institutional Investor As Lead Plaintiff Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers 2009 Securities Litigation Study (April 2010) Final 2009 data was not available; the full-year projections were based upon filings through June 30, 2009.
© Milberg Institutional Investors Account for Vast Majority of Settlements 91 total settlements valued at $3.1 billion in % of cases settled in 2009 had an institutional investor as lead plaintiff However, the value of the cases led by an institutional investor that settled in 2009 accounted for 85% of the value of total 2009 settlements Nine of the top ten settlements in 2009 had institutional investors as the lead plaintiff Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers 2009 Securities Litigation Study (April 2010)
© Milberg Recent Jury Verdict: In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Recent trial ended with a jury verdict finding Vivendi liable on all counts Retirement System for the General Employees of the City of Miami was a lead plaintiff Class includes foreign institutional and individual investors Investors estimated to recover up to $9.3 billion
© Milberg Transactional and Derivative Litigation – Protecting Assets From Future Losses Comverse Derivative Litigation $62 million in cash + significant corporate governance reforms (subject to court approval at June 21, 2010 hearing) Southwest Airlines Improved reporting procedures Anheuser Busch Litigation Settled for additional disclosures in proxy statement concerning merger with InBev, protections for certain AB employees and an increase in the merger consideration Madoff Litigation Brought on behalf of feeder funds that invested with Madoff Alleges that the funds managers failed to conduct adequate due diligence Alleges that the funds auditors failed to conduct proper audits
© Milberg Foreign Fund Trends and Statistics
© Milberg A Foothold in Two of Top 10 securities class action settlements of all time have been against foreign corporations Nortel (two cases brought in 2001 and 2004): $2.2 billion Royal Ahold N.V. (2003): $1.1 billion Cross-border transactions Globalization of the securities marketplace Outreach by U.S.-based securities class action firms Education and marketing efforts of U.S.-based securities litigators Growing relationships between U.S. class actions firms and international institutional investors
© Milberg Non-U.S. Institutional Investor Lead- Plaintiff Applicants Trend Source: ISS Research (Dec 2008)
© Milberg Growing Geographic Distribution 234 instances of international institutional investors moving for lead plaintiff status (1996 through 2007) 134 different cases 25 different countries 31 different law firms represented the international institutional investors Top 5 Countries: Germany, Canada, Israel, Italy and United Kingdom Included public pension funds, asset managers, mutual funds, union pension plans, and hedge funds
© Milberg Non-U.S. Institutional Investor Lead Plaintiff Applicants by Country: Source: ISS Research (Dec 2008)
© Milberg Foreign Participation Contributions in U.S. Securities Class Actions Maximize shareholders returns Nortel Networks cases Help achieve important corporate governance changes Increase credibility of cases Steer class definition to include Eurobond purchasers and/or shares purchased on foreign exchanges Increased participation by non-U.S. investors in U.S.- based securities class actions may drive legal reforms in their own countries Structure settlements to include international institutional investors
© Milberg Attractiveness of U.S. Lawsuits Ability to sue on behalf of other similarly situated persons is largely unique to the United States Availability of contingency fee arrangements Absence of loser pays fee-shifting rules Confidentiality Order Scheduling Orders, which move the litigation Right to expansive discovery after Motion to Dismiss phase Well-developed system for certifying class actions Potential for a large jury verdict
© Milberg Lead Plaintiff Incentives Submit claim forms in a timely fashion 30-70% of institutional investors fail to file claim forms in cases where they have losses Extraordinary percentage in light of $6.9 billion in securities class action settlements finalized in 2007 Unaware of lawsuits until after the LP deadline Increased attention to the filing process may lead to more active involvement by international institutional investors
© Milberg Opting-Out of Class Actions Depends on the particulars of a plaintiffs claims and the strengths of those claims connected to the plaintiffs purchases Typically reserved for plaintiffs with substantial losses and financial and structural wherewithal to pursue its own claims The ability of defendants to pay damages Advantages of opting-out The ability to select the venue in which to file The power to select counsel The ability to direct settlement unimpeded by the court or class issues Possibility of obtaining a recovery many times larger than what would have been obtained in a class recovery No need to seek class certification Risks Opt-out plaintiff runs the risk of non-recovery- opting out forever bars that plaintiff in participating in the class settlement or judgment
© Milberg The Milberg Difference
© Milberg Milberg LLP: Setting the Standard Expertise Lead Counsel in 29 of the Top 100 Settlements Co-lead counsel in more of the 100 largest settlements than any other plaintiff law firm Top 10 plaintiffs law firm based on total settlements in 2008 Leadership in landmark cases (e.g., Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor) Resources Financial and human resources to oppose defense firms Top-tier attorneys supported by in-house experts Forensic accountants and investigators Litigation technical support Results 40 years of unparalleled recoveries on behalf of investors Sources: RiskMetrics SCAS 100 for 2009 and SCAS 50 for 2008
© Milberg Recent and Notable Milberg LLP Securities Class Action Results DateCaseRecovery ($) January 29, 2010In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities Litig., No. 1:02-cv RJH-HBP $9,300,000,000 (est) August 9, 2009In re Initial Public Offerings Sec. Litig., No. 21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.)$586,000,000 January 14, 2009Carlson v. Xerox Corp. et. al., No. 3:00-CV-1621 (D. Conn.)$750,000,000 January 6, 2009In re Chiron Corp. Sec. Litig., No. C (N.D. Cal.)$30,000,000 August 8, 2008In re Biovail Sec. Litig., No. 03-CV-8917 (S.D.N.Y.)$138,000,000 December 19, 2007 In re Tyco Intl, Ltd. Multidistrict Litigation, No (D.N.H.)$3,200,000,000 September 6, 2007 In re CMS Energy Sec. Litig., No (E.D. Mich.)$200,000,000 July 18, 2007In re American Express Fin. Advisors Sec. Litig., No (D.N.J.)$100,000,000 June 8, 2007In re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., Sec. Litig., No (S.D.N.Y.)$30,000,000 January 29, 2007In re Nortel Networks Corp. Sec. Litig. (Nortel I), No. 01-CV-1855 (S.D.N.Y.)$1,142,000,000 January 8, 2007In re Sears, Roebuck & Co. Sec. Litig., No (N.D. Ill.)$215,000,000 September 7, 2005 In re CVS Corp. Securities Litigation, No (D. Mass.)$110,000,000 June 14, 2005In re Deutsche Telekom AG Securities Litigation, No (S.D.N.Y.)$120,000,000
© Milberg Milberg LLP Practice Areas Institutional Investor Services Portfolio Monitoring Quarterly Reporting Case Evaluation Corporate Governance and Shareholder Rights Advice Litigation Bankruptcy Pro Bono Litigation False Claims – Qui Tam Mass Torts Class Action Litigation Securities Fraud Consumer Fraud ERISA Insurance Antitrust Human Rights and Labor Practices Derivative Madoff Transactional Governance and Fees
© Milberg Thank You
© Milberg Benjamin Y. Kaufman, Esq. E States of New York and New Jersey T Education: B.A., Yeshiva University, 1985 F J.D., Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law of Yeshiva University, 1988 Beklin Fellow, Belkin Scholar M.B.A., Stern School of Business of New York University, 1999 Mr. Kaufman focuses on class actions on behalf of defrauded investors and consumers. Mr. Kaufmans successful securities litigations include In re Deutsche Telekom AG Securities Litig., No (S.D.N.Y.), a complex international securities litigation requiring evidentiary discovery in both the United States and Europe, which settled for $120 million. Mr. Kaufman was also part of the team that recovered $46 million for investors in In re Asia Pulp & Paper Securities Litigation, No. 01- CV-7351 (S.D.N.Y.) and $43.1 million, with contributions of $20 million, $14.85 million and $8.25 million from Motorola, the individual defendants, and defendant underwriters respectively, in Freeland v. Iridium World Commcns, Ltd. Mr. Kaufmans outstanding representative results in derivative and transactional litigations include: In re Trump Hotels Shareholder Derivative Litigation (Trump personally contributed some of his holdings; the company increased the number of directors on its board, and certain future transactions had to be reviewed by a special committee.) He recently argued the appeal in In re Comverse Technology, Inc. Derivative Litig., 56 AD3d 49 (2008) which led to the seminal New York Appellate Division opinion which clarified the standards of demand futility, and held that a board of directors loses the protection of the business judgment rule where there is evidence of self-dealing and poor judgment by the directors; and In re Topps Company, Inc. Shareholder Litig. which resulted in a 2007 decision which vindicated the rights of shareholders under the rules of comity and doctrine of forum non conveniens and to pursue claims in the most relevant forum notwithstanding the fact that jurisdiction might exist as well in the state of incorporation. Mr. Kaufman is also at the forefront of consumer litigations with a recently-filed litigation brought on behalf of paid subscribers against web hosting and service providers in Golf Clubs Away LLC v. Hostway Corporation, et al., Case No (Fl. Cir. Ct., Broward County). In addition, Mr. Kaufman represents many of the firm's corporate clients in complex commercial litigation matters and arbitrations, including Puckett v. Sony Music Entertainment, No /98 (New York Cty. 2002) (a complex copyright royalty class action) and in arbitrations on behalf of oppressed minority shareholders in both public and privately held corporations. Prior to joining Milberg in August of 1998, Mr. Kaufman was a Court Attorney for the New York State Supreme Court, New York County ( ) and Principal Law Clerk to Justice Herman Cahn of the Commercial Division of the New York State Supreme Court, New York County ( ).
© Milberg Todd Kammerman, Esq. E States of New York and New Jersey T Education: B.A., Brandeis University, 1999 cum laude with honors F J.D., Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law of Yeshiva University, 2002 Alexander Fellow Mr. Kammerman focuses his practice on litigation involving defrauded investors and consumers. Mr. Kammermans successful litigations include In re CMS Energy Securities Litigation, No (E.D. Mich.) ($200 million recovery); In re Royal Dutch/Shell Transport ERISA Litigation, No (D.N.J.) ($90 million recovery); Scheiner v. i2 Technologies, et al., No (N.D. Tex.) ($87.8 million recovery); and In re Collins & Aikman Corporation Securities Litigation, No (E.D. Mich.) ($10.8 million recovery). Mr. Kammerman played a pivotal role in the In re Comverse Technology, Inc. Derivative Litigation ($62 million recovery), particularly in drafting the appellate briefs which led to the seminal New York Appellate Division opinion, reported at 56 A.D.3d 49 (2008), clarifying the standards of demand futility, and holding that a board of directors loses the protection of the business judgment rule where there is evidence of self-dealing and poor judgment by the directors. He was also a member of the team that litigated the appeal in Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. before the United States Supreme Court, in which the Supreme Court issued an opinion defining the pleading standard for scienter in all federal securities fraud cases, and is reported at 551 U.S. 308 (2007). While at Cardozo, he was named an Alexander Fellow, through which he worked as a judicial intern in the chambers of the Honorable Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr., U.S.D.J. in Newark, New Jersey. Mr. Kammerman is a member of the bars of the States of New York and New Jersey and is admitted to practice before the United States District Courts for the District of New Jersey, Southern District of New York, Eastern District of Michigan and the Eastern District of New York and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third and Eleventh Circuits.
© Milberg Milberg LLP New York One Pennsylvania Plaza 49 th Floor New York, New York T or F Los Angeles One California Plaza 300 South Grand Avenue Suite 3900 Los Angeles, California T F Tampa Corporate Center One 2202 N. Westshore Blvd. Suite 200 Tampa, Florida T F Detroit One Kennedy Square 777 Woodward Avenue Suite 890 Detroit, MI T F
© Milberg USING THE LAW TO PROTECT YOUR FUNDS ASSETS: The Role of Institutional Investors in U.S. Shareholder Litigation Prepared for: The Tel Aviv.
US Securities Class Actions: Business Risks and Litigation Strategies Marc J. GottridgeMichael M. Yi Lovells Yi Cho & Brunstein, LLC New York OfficeNew.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Global Business and Accounting Chapter 15.
New York Investing Meetup RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A..
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 4 Slide 1 The Court System Dispute Resolution and the Courts Federal.
INTERNATIONAL LAW PARMA UNIVERSITY International Business and Development International Markets and Organizations Law Prof. Gabriele Catalini.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Merchandising Activities Chapter 6.
Qualcomm Incorporated, v. Broadcom Corporation. U.S. Federal Court Rules of Civil Procedure – amended rules December 1, 2006 to include electronically.
Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements Chapter 4: Legal Liability Copyright © 2011 Pearson Canada Inc.
43-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
© 2007 Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved. What is a Civil Case?
Chapter © 2010 South-Western, Cengage Learning Dispute Resolution The Legal System Other Redress Solutions 30.
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA Telephone: (310) Facsimile: (310) Newport Center Drive, Suite 400.
PPS t/a Carnegie et al; Accounting: Financial and Organisational Decision Making © 1999 McGraw-Hill Book Co. Aust. 1.1 ACCOUNTING Financial and Organisational.
Chapter 20 Legal Liability McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Introduction/Civil procedure. Federal law, state statutory law & common law.
PIC Investments Performance Update Year ended 30 September 2014 APPENDIX Advisor Use Only.
25-1 Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution.
Chapter 3 The American Judicial System, Jurisdiction, and Venue McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McDonald’s calendar 2009 January
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 4: Legal Liability.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 National Center for the Training of Bank Personnel of Ukraine.
Enron – Shareholders Aaron Palmer Seyoung Park. Shareholders Common shareholders - saw their holdings dwindle to almost nothing Employees - lost 401(k)
Chapter 7 Review Economics. 1 The person or group that buys a franchise. Franchisee.
1 CAP Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) Permanency.
New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission Pay-to-Play January 2013.
The Colorado Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution 1 Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
HIGH-RISK: FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT BANKING. 1/2004Anti-Money Laundering 2 OBJECTIVES Define Foreign Correspondent Banking Understand Potential and Unique.
TOPIC 7: SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS AND REMEDIES….contd.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Legal Liability Chapter 5.
Due Diligence for Directors Martin Elliott Kovnats Jeffrey Kyle Merk.
Bruce W. Leppla Partner Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP x INVESTMENT COMPANY.
Securities Act - Liability Section 11 Damages Negative causation Indemnification (last updated 19 Feb 13)
U.S. SECURITIES FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS -- Implications For Israeli Investors Jeremy A. Lieberman, Esq. P OMERANTZ LLP New York City.
Proprietorships, Partnerships, and Corporations Acct 2210: Chp 11 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
January 21, 2009Charles J. Noel & Associates, P.A.1 Minnesota’s First-Party Bad Faith Statute M.S (2008) Presented to Northwest Loss Association.
1 Public Speaking: From Large Audiences to Internal Staff Meetings Rebecca Otto State Auditor NASACT Middle Management Conference April 18, 2013 St. Paul,
1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Solving Disputes: The Services of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO-INSME Training.
1 The Changing Fortunes of the EUs Energy Market Antony Froggatt.
NANPA Oversight Working Group Status Report to the NANC April 17, 2001 Chair Pat Caldwell.
Chapter 11 Reporting and Interpreting Owners’ Equity.
Research Department 1 Global Economic Crisis and the Israeli Economy Herzliya conference Dr. Karnit Flug Research Director, Bank of Israel February 2009.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 40 The Stock Market Crashes.
Russias Image Among Foreign Investors Key findings from survey and focus group research conducted April – May 2007 by HART RESEARCH P e t e r D ASSOTESCIA.
Blair A. Nicholas | Partner BLB&G Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 | San Diego, CA T | F.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Regulation of Securities, Corporate Governance, and.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Canada. 6.1 Chapter 6 Openness in Goods and Financial Markets The Short Run Power Point Presentation Brian VanBlarcom.
Xenia man faces rape charges of 12- year-old girl 1 Knight’s Inn at 38 S. Allison Ave. Xenia Facebook Under the age of 13 - Rape.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.