Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

October 19, 2010 State Growth Model 2006-10 Trends AYP Results 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "October 19, 2010 State Growth Model 2006-10 Trends AYP Results 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools."— Presentation transcript:

1 October 19, 2010 State Growth Model Trends AYP Results 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools

2 How did we do?

3 2010 School Committee Presentation Accomplishments Concerns Changes AYP Results Gap Analysis Grade Level Analysis Subgroup Performance CPI Performance Primer Gap Analysis State Growth Model Brockton Public Schools

4 Status Accomplishments Concerns Changes AYP Brockton Public Schools

5 Brockton AYP 2010 Results Adequate Yearly Progress History NCLB Status ELA Aggregate Yes No Yes No Corrective Action - Subgroups All Subgroups - - No MATH Aggregate Yes No Yes No Corrective Action - Subgroups All Subgroups - - No Brockton Public Schools

6

7 MCAS ELA Performance Targets State BPS

8 Brockton Public Schools MCAS Math Performance Targets State BPS

9 21 Ways to Miss AYP North Middle School Math 7 Targets3 Categories Brockton Public Schools A + (B or C) + D = AYP

10 AYP Accomplishments Angelo, Ashfield, BHS, Davis, North, Plouffe, South,& West Earned High Performance Ratings in ELA Angelo, Davis, North, & Plouffe made AYP in the Aggregate for ELA Ashfield, North & Plouffe made AYP in the Aggregate for Math Brockton Public Schools

11 AYP Challenges District Missed AYP at Every Grade Band. No School Made AYP in Both Aggregate and Subgroups. Brockton Public Schools

12 Changes National Standards Common Core National Assessments Common Core Assessments Potential Changes in NCLB New Tiers and Levels Brockton Public Schools

13 Aggregated & Disaggregated Trends & 2010 Results CPI Performance Brockton Public Schools

14 ELA CPI: Three Different Levels Three Different Stories Brockton Public Schools Aggregate Grade Band Grade Level

15 ELA CPI Aggregate BPS vs. State Brockton Public Schools BPS State

16 ELA CPI by Grade Band Brockton Public Schools 5 Gain 7.3 Gain -1.2 Decline

17 ELA CPI Gain/Loss by Grade Level Brockton Public Schools Elementary Losses Secondary Grade Gains Small Gain 5.8 Gain 6.7 Gain

18 2010 ELA Gains Brockton Public Schools

19 Grade 3 ELA Reversal? 2010 Outgains State Brockton Public Schools 5.6 Gain 3.2 Gain 2.4 Gain -2.4 Loss BPS State

20 Grade 8 ELA 1 Year Regression: 5 Year Positive Trend Brockton Public Schools 8.8 Gain

21 2010 ELA CPA Aggregate Brockton Public Schools 9.8 Gap.3 Gap

22 ELA Subgroup Gain BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools

23 2010 ELA Subgroup BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools 75.1

24 BPS vs State SWD ELA Gain: Why We Drill Down Brockton Public Schools Elementary Down Secondary Higher

25 Brockton Public Schools Math CPI Aggregate BPS vs. State State BPS

26 Math CPI by Grade Band Brockton Public Schools 9.4 Gain 9.8 Gain 4 Gain

27 Gain/Loss by Grade Level Brockton Public Schools Gains Decline Smaller Gains Larger Gains

28 2010 Math Gains Brockton Public Schools Area of Concern

29 Grade 3 Math 1 Year Improvement: Overall Trend is Down Brockton Public Schools Loss 1 Year 1.7 Gain

30 2010 Math CPI Aggregate Brockton Public Schools 13 Gap 1.9 Gap

31 Math Subgroup Gain BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools LEP

32 2010 Math Subgroup BPS vs State Brockton Public Schools

33 BPS vs State SWD Grade Level Gain Brockton Public Schools Elementary Concerns Secondary Gains Overall Gain

34 Trends Accomplishments Grade 7 & 8 Large Gains in ELA & Decreased Achievement Gap with State Grades 7, 8, & 10 Improved Strongly In Math & Decreased Achievement Gap with State Grade 10 Improved in ELA Grades 4, 5, 6 Improved in Math Concerns Grade 4 ELA trending down. State trending up. Grades 3-6 have not improved in ELA Grade 3 Math Down while state has gained State Outgained BPS in 5 Different Grades in Math Brockton Public Schools

35 Primer Gap Analysis Growth

36 State Growth Model: Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Academic Peer Group Each student is compared to students with a similar score history Percentiles State Growth Percentile is always th percentile means better than 70 % Brockton Public Schools

37 Growth to grade 7: Three students Mary Paul Peter SGP Grade Grade Grade English language arts Academic Peer Groups

38 Interpreting Student Growth Percentiles Peter’s SGP was 35. His score was higher than 35% of his academic peers (and lower than 65%). 35 Percent of students Lower growthHigher growthTypical growth Brockton Public Schools Is that amount of growth typical?

39 Seeking the Northeast Quadrant Low Growth, High PerformanceHigh Growth, High Performance Low Growth, Low PerformanceHigh Growth, Low Performance Growth (SGP) Brockton Public Schools

40 ELA Scatterplot Brockton Public Schools PerformancePerformance Growth

41 Math Scatterplot Brockton Public Schools PerformancePerformance Growth

42 ELA SGP Brockton Public Schools

43 Math SGP Brockton Public Schools

44 SGP Trend Summary Accomplishments Every Grade has average or better SGP in ELA BPS Grade 10 had highest SGP among Comparable Districts in ELA 2010 Grade 4 gained 10 points in Math Grade 7 gained 10 points in Math Concerns Lowest growth in Elementary Grades in ELA Grades 5 & 6 are low and declining in Math Brockton Public Schools

45 Conclusions Missed Aggregate AYP in ELA & Math NCLB Change is Likely AYP Middle & High School Gaining in ELA and Math Elementary Declining in ELA: Gaining in Math 2010 Secondary Decline & Elementary Gain in ELA 2010 Middle School Gain in Math CPI ELA growth is moderate to high Math growth is moderate to low Growth Brockton Public Schools

46 Brockton Public Schools Data Presentation 2010 October 19, 2010 Dr. Ethan R. Cancell School Committee MayorLinda M. Balzotti Chair Ward One Thomas J. Minichiello, Jr. Vice-Chair Ward Two Richard E. Bath Ward Three Janice A. Beyer Ward FourPatricia A. Joyce Ward FiveWilliam Carpenter Ward SixJames M. Daley Ward SevenTimothy J. Sullivan SuperintendentMatthew H. Malone, Ph.D. Secretary

47 END AYP Trends SGP 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools


Download ppt "October 19, 2010 State Growth Model 2006-10 Trends AYP Results 2010 School Committee Presentation Brockton Public Schools."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google