Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2D ANSYS analysis of the QXF structure Mariusz Juchno QXF internal meeting 19 February, 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2D ANSYS analysis of the QXF structure Mariusz Juchno QXF internal meeting 19 February, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 2D ANSYS analysis of the QXF structure Mariusz Juchno QXF internal meeting 19 February, 2013

2 Keypole material and size Keypole slot added 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno2 L W/2D

3 I 0 = -19670 A Keypole – D = 4.64 mm (from HQ drawing) – L = 10 mm – W = 6, 10,15 mm (8 mm hole needed) Shellth = 27 mm Interf = 650 um P bladder = 41.7 MPa (for interf + ~100 um) Special cases to illustrate possible adjustment – (*) Interf = 600 um -> P bladder = 38.9 MPa – (**) Interf = 625 um -> P bladder = 40.4 MPa Parameters (155 T/m, 90% of I ss ) 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno3

4 Keypole study summary 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno4 MatWCoil σ eq max warm Coil σ eq max cold Iron σ eq max warm Iron σ I max cold Coil p cont Al6 mm101164208233-4.5, -12.4 10 mm102164199234-4.3, -12.6 15 mm104165190234-4.0, -12.8 G1010 mm106167195233-8.1, -14.7 15 mm109168190232-9.3, -15.7 SS10 mm100162202234-2.4, -11.1 15 mm100162190235-1.1, -10.7 Ti10 mm101161201235-1.2, -9.6 15 mm1021601902350.7, -8.8 G10 *10 mm99164185223-3.6, -11.8 G10 **15 mm106167183228-7.0, -14.1

5 Keypole width variation – effect only visible in case of iron σ eq max at warm Thermal contraction and elastic modulus plays important role for coil contact pressure (preload) Best candidates: – G10 Simplifies insulation scheme Bigger thermal contraction -> intercepts less force Might allow to reduce preload Risk of loosing contact with collars – Titanium Can be integrated in the pole Smaller thermal contraction -> intercepts more force Requires more preload 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno5 Keypole study summary

6 Sensitivity study Mariusz Juchno QXF internal meeting 19 February, 2013

7 Interference 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno7

8 Interference 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno8 P bladder adjusted to always have +100um more than interference

9 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno9 Shell thickness

10 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno10 Iron σ I stress at cold slightly more sensitive than in interference case OD is fixed P bladder adjusted to have fixed interference

11 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno11 Pad thickness

12 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno12 Yoke (busbar slot) Pad (corner) Gain (when decreasing padth): – Reduction of iron σ I stress at cold – Improve the contact (L1 more than L2) – Should improve keypole contact Loss (when decreasing padth): – Increase of stress in the coil – Increase of stress in the iron at warm (pad cornet – might not be important)

13 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno13 Vertical key position

14 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno14 Gain (when shifting the key down): – Reduction of coil stress at cold – Reduction of the pole contact offset between layers – More space for the bladder Loss (when shifting the key down): – Increase of σ I stress in the iron at cold (mostly busbar slot) – Chance for losing keypole contact

15 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno15 Key length

16 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno16 Gain (when lowering the bottom face): – Reduction of coil stress at cold – Reduction of the pole contact offset between layers – Smaller chance for losing keypole contact Loss (when lowering the bottom face): – Increase of σ I stress in the iron at cold (mostly busbar slot)

17 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno17 Pad Engagement (?)

18 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno18 Pad Engagement (?) Gain (decreasing eng): – Control over the pole contact pressure (not significant) – Space for axial rods Loss (decreasing eng): – Plasticization of the pad corner (artifact?)

19 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno19 Busbar slot angle

20 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno20 Busbar slot angle Gain (when increasing): – Small reduction of σ I stress in the iron at cold

21 Design Criteria Work in progress 11/15/2012 2nd Joint HiLumi LHC - LARP Annual Meeting - H. Felice 21 Pole-coil contact at 155 T/m (90% of I s ), p cont ≥ 2 MPa in midpoint Max bladder pressure < 50 MPa (better 40 MPa?) Bladder should open the interf=interf nom + 100μm σ eq coil max ≤ 150-200 MPa at 4.3K and 155 T/m ≤ 100 MPa at 293K All components σ ≤ R p 0.2 For iron at 4.3K (brittle) σ I ≤ ~200 MPa MaterialR p 0.2 [MPa] 293 K4.3 K Al 7075480690 SS 316 LN3501050 NITRONIC 403531240 MAGNETIL180723 Ti 6Al 4V8271654

22 Parameters tuning 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno22 ParameterReferenceModified MaterialAlTiG10 Kpw15 mm 12 mm Interf650 um+0 Shellth27 mm-2-2 Padth42 mm-4-2 Keyy27 mm-2 Keyh12.7 mm+4+2 Eng33 mm-6-50 Busdeg30 o +2

23 Structure state (90% (1), and 80% (2) I ss ) 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno23 ReferenceModified AlTiG10 15 mm 12 mm Coilσ eqv (b)104107110105 σ eqv (k)71757775 σ eqv (c)172174184180 σ eqv (g)165148 (1), 131 (2) 163 (1), 146 (2) 160 (1), 144 (2) Ironσ eqv (b)190174180175 σ eqv (k)196170180175 σ I (c)219180192186 σ I (g)234194 (1), 192 (2) 208 (1), 205 (2) 199 (1), 197 (2) p blad (gap) (3) 42 (750,767um)40 (740,760um)40 (733,753um)39 (730,750um) P cont -4, -12-2, -5 (1) -24, -17 (2) -11, -14 (1) -33, -27 (2) -7, -11 (1) -28, -24 (2) Kp gap0 um ~0 um0 um (3) P blad conservative due to model symmetry, otherwise around 10% lower -> lower coil and iron stresses during bladder operation

24 Straight vs Round Collars Mariusz Juchno QXF internal meeting 19 February, 2013

25 Geometry 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno25

26 Coil contact 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno26 Trapezoid collars – Possible to obtains similar contact on the midnode Round collars – Layer 2 not evenly loaded while layer 1 overloaded – Tension-compression transition close to the midnode -0.8 MPa -7.7 MPa -11MPa -7 MPa

27 Collar contact 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno27 Trapezoid collars – More uniform contact distribution over the length similar to coils height Round collars – Force transfer close to the midplane -> layer 2 gets not enough preload

28 Structure state 19/02/2013 Mariusz Juchno28 ReferenceRound Al 15 mm Coilσ eqv (b)104107 σ eqv (k)7186 σ eqv (c)172200 σ eqv (g)165137 Ironσ eqv (b)190 σ eqv (k)196191 σ I (c)219214 σ I (g)234231 p blad (gap) (3) 42 (750,767um)42 (752,764um) P cont -4, -12-14, -4 Kp gap0 um8 um Overloaded 1st layer (200 MPa in the coil after cooldown, and much higher contact pressure) 2nd layer not sufficiently loaded – keypole gap opened Round collars seem les sensitive to optimization due to force transfer close to the midplane


Download ppt "2D ANSYS analysis of the QXF structure Mariusz Juchno QXF internal meeting 19 February, 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google