Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 The infringement procedures – fines for non- compliance* Dr. Günter Wilms LL.M. Member of the European Commission’s Legal Service * The opinions expressed.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 The infringement procedures – fines for non- compliance* Dr. Günter Wilms LL.M. Member of the European Commission’s Legal Service * The opinions expressed."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 The infringement procedures – fines for non- compliance* Dr. Günter Wilms LL.M. Member of the European Commission’s Legal Service * The opinions expressed are personal and do not represent the ones of the Commission

2 2 I.Introduction EU community of law System of legal protection of the essence (f.i.: judgment of 3 September 2008, case C-402/05 P und C-415/05 P. Kadi/Council and Commission, para. 281)

3 3 I.Introduction Role of the Court of Justice: –Ensure that the law is observed (Article 19 TEU) Article 17 TEU → the Commission “guardian of the Treaties” Article 258 TFEU : → 1st infringement procedure Article 260 TFEU: → 2 nd infringement procedure, in case of non/bad execution of a judgment

4 4 II.Infringement Procedure, General Pre-litigation phase: - Opening of the case (ex officio or following a complaint) - Pilot Phase - Letter of Formal Notice - Reasoned Opinion Litigation phase: 1st Infringement: Art. 258 TFEU 2 nd Infringement: Art. 260 TFEU

5 5 II.Infringement Procedure, General: Pre-litigation phase Framework: Art. 4(3) TEU: obligation of MS to cooperate with the Commission Letter of Formal Notice Reasoned Opinion –defines the subject-matter of the dispute –fixes a time limit within which the MS must comply (2 months) Sets the frame (time-wise and content-wise) for the litigation phase

6 6 II.Infringement Procedure, General Litigation Phase: Written (application, defence, reply, rejoinder) and oral (hearing) If MS condemned: (Art. 260(1) TFEU, special expression of duty to cooperate loyally Art. 4(3) TEU): –MS must take the necessary measures to comply with the judgement immediately

7 7 Environment and taxation account for almost half of the infringement proceedings

8 8 Number of infringement proceedings by Member States

9 9 III.Second Infringement: Sanctions Sanctions for failure to comply with the first judgment: the Art. 260 TFEU procedure –Case law –Calculation of lump sums and penalty payments Changes introduced by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union : new Art. 260 (3) TFEU

10 10 III.Second Infringement: Art. 260 (2) TFEU Failure to comply Pre-litigation –No reasoned opinion –Commission shall specify the amount of the lump sum or penalty payment –Must be appropriate in the circumstances

11 11 III.Second Infringement: Art. 260(3) TFEU New Failure to notify measures transposing a directive Commission may propose penalty payment or lump sum already in “ first infringement ” Court bound by the Commission’s proposal as a ceiling

12 12 III.Second Infringement: History Until 2002 the COM asked the Court only to impose daily penalty payments Result: MS complied only at a late stage Purpose of financial sanctions was re-examined

13 13 III.Second Infringement: Purpose Objectives of two sanctions → complementary: Penalty payment (Persuasive function): → end an infringement ASAP after the 2 nd judgment Lump sum (Dissuasive function) → effects on public and private interests caused by the failure to comply with the 1 st judgement

14 14 III.Second Infringement: Precedents C-304/02 COM v France cumulative use: -Breach of Community law -has continued for a long period and -is inclined to persist (par. 82) -In the concrete case: Penalty payment of EUR for each period of 6 months Lump sum of EUR

15 15 III.Second Infringement: Lessons learned Practical consequences of C-304/02 COM v France: - COM includes now, in general, in its applications to the Court a specification of: »both the penalty payment by day of delay after the delivery of the judgement under Art. 260 TFEU »and a lump sum penalising the continuation of the infringement between the first judgement and the one delivered under Art. 260 TFEU

16 16 III. Second Infringement: Communications by the Commission Purpose of the communications –Legal certainty –Proportionality and equal treatment –Deterrent effect → encourage early compliance

17 17 Calculation of sanctions (SEC 2011/1024 of 01/09/2011; principles: SEC 2005/1658 of 09/12/2005) Criteria: 1. Seriousness of the infringement 1.2. Duration of the infringement 2.3. Sanction deterrent for further infringements 3.Respect of proportionality principle (in particular) Sanction has to be appropriate in case of partial compliance Progress made towards compliance must be taken into account (several infringements separate sanctions; reduction for progress made)

18 18 Calculation of sanctions (SEC 2011/1024 of 01/09/2011; principles: SEC 2005/1658 of 09/12/2005) Standard flat rates: for daily penalty payments: 630€/day x coeff. for seriousness from 1 to 20 x coeff. for duration between 1 and 3 x factor ‘n’( → GNP&votes in Council) for lump sum: 208€/dayx coeff. for seriousness from 1 to 20 x factor ‘n’( → GNP&votes in Council) x number of days between 1st judgment and compliance or 2 nd judgment Minimum lump sum: Between € (EST) and € (GER)

19 19 NEW ART. 260(3) TFEU Raison d’être Stronger incentive to transpose directives within deadlines Help EU citizens to enjoy the rights conferred by these directives at an earlier stage Respect for the legislator

20 20 Infringement proceeding for non-conformity as percentage of Internal Market directives (as of 1 May 2011) All statistics from: SEC(2011) 1128 final Internal Market Scoreboard n°23,

21 21 NEW ART. 260(3) TFEU Features of this instrument: Already in first infringement lump sum and / or penalty payment may be imposed Court will not exceed the amount specified by the Com.

22 22 NEW ART. 260(3) TFEU Communication on the Implementation of Art. 260(3) TFEU [O.J. C 12 of 15/01/2011 p. 1] Same principles as Art. 260(2) TFEU 2 possible cases: –Total failure to notify transposition measures –Partial notifications of these measures

23 23 NEW ART. 260(3) TFEU Coefficient of duration: –Starting point: day following the expiry of the transposition period Proposal of the COM is not binding for the Court But: Court cannot go beyond

24 24 CasePartiesSubstanceSanction imposed C-387/97Com./GreeceWaste Euro per day C-287/01Com./SpainQuality of bathing waters Euro per cent for affected bathing waters C-304/02Com./FranceProhibition to catch small fish Euro per 6 months of non-compliance and Euro lump sum C-177/04Com./FranceNon-transposition of product safety directive Euro per day of non-transposition C-119/04Com./ItalyForeign language teachersCondemned for non-compliance but no sanction C-503/04Com./GermanyWaste treatment Braunschweig Condemned for non-compliance but no sanction C-70/06Com./PortugalPublic procurement Euro per day of non-compliance C-121/07Com./FranceGMOs Euro lump sum C-369/07Com./GreeceSubsidies fpr Olympic Airways Euro per day of non-compliance and Euro lump sum C-457/07Com./PortugalFree circulation of construction products Rejected C-568/07Com./GreeceOptician-stores Euro lump sum C-109/08Com./GreeceGambling machines Euro per day of non-compliance and Euro lump sum C-407/09Com./GreeceCompensation of crime victims Euro lump sum C-469/09Com./ItalyRecovery of illegal State aid Penalty payment Euro per 6 months x % of unlawful aid not recovered  Euro lump sum

25 25 Average duration of infringement proceedings (from one year to almost three years)

26 26 Cases from most Member States are still open more than 12 months after the Court ruling

27 27 CLOSING STATEMENT For it is only through a legally stable environment, based on the rule of law, democratic principles and fundamental rights, that the confidence of citizens, of partners and investors can be gained and upheld. Commission President Barroso, Plenary debate of the EP Strasbourg, 18th January 2012


Download ppt "1 The infringement procedures – fines for non- compliance* Dr. Günter Wilms LL.M. Member of the European Commission’s Legal Service * The opinions expressed."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google