Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byWayne Doty Modified over 3 years ago

1
Using k to Estimate and Test Patterns in the APIM David A. Kenny February 17, 2013

2
You need to know the Actor Partner Interdependence Model and APIM patterns! 2 APIM APIM Patterns

3
Couple Model – Equal Actor and Partner Effects: a = p Contrast Model –Actor plus partner sums to zero: a – p = 0 Actor Only Model –Partner effect is zero: p = 0 Partner Only Model –Actor effect is zero: a = 0 3

4
Suggested by Kenny and Ledermann (2010) k is the ratio of the partner effect to the actor effect or p/a k is named after Larry Kurdek, a pioneer in the study of dyadic data Special cases of k: –k is 1, couple model –k equal to −1, contrast model –k equal to zero, actor-only model The Parameter k 4

5
-1 0 +1 Contrast Actor Only Couple a = -p p = 0 a = p 5

6
-1 0 +1 Contrast Actor Only Couple a = -p p = 0 a = p But k might equal 0.5. 6

7
Phantom Variables One way to estimate k is using a phantom variable. Phantom variable –No conceptual meaning –Forces a constraint –Latent variable –No disturbance 7

8
Standard APIM X1X1 X2X2 Y1Y1 Y2Y2 E1 E2 1 1 a1a1 p 21 p 12 a2a2 8

9
Phantom Variables to Estimate k X1X1 X2X2 Y1Y1 Y2Y2 E1 E2 1 1 a1a1 a2a2 P1P1 a1a1 k1k1 P2P2 a2a2 k2k2 9

10
Estimates and Confidence Interval Use bootstrapping to obtain the asymmetric confidence interval (CI). Check to see if 1, -1, or 0 are in the CI of k. 10

11
Note that k is not defined when the actor effect is zero. Thus, k and its confidence interval should not be computed if the actor effect is small. Caution in Computing the Parameter k

12
Distinguishability and k 12

13
13

14
Results Distinguishable Wives: k W = 0.851 (0.223 to 2.038 ) Husbands: k H = 0.616 (0.294 to 1.187) Equal values of k k W = k H = 0.710 (0.489 to 0.989 ) 2 (1) = 0.320, p =.571 Indistinguishable: k = 0.719 (0.484 to 1.027) 14 CI

15
Example Setups Amos and Mplus (and soon laavan) setups can be downloaded at davidakenny.net/papers/k_apim/k_apim.htm 15

16
Defining k in Terms of X or k X 16

17
X1X1 X2X2 Y1Y1 Y2Y2 E1 E2 1 1 a1a1 p 21 p 12 a2a2 17

18
X1X1 X2X2 Y1Y1 Y2Y2 E1 E2 1 1 a1a1 p 21 p 12 a2a2 18

19
Defining k in as Actor Effect Divided by Partner Effect 19

20
Conclusion Using k can simplify the model and link the model to theory. Reading Kenny & Ledermann (2010), Journal of Family Psychology, 24, pp. 359-366. 20

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS

ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on index numbers meaning Ppt on travel and tourism in kerala Ppt on natural selection Plant anatomy and physiology ppt on cells Free video backgrounds for ppt on social media Ppt on steve jobs biography pdf Free ppt on forest society and colonialism notes Ppt on bond length is the distance Ppt on marie curie biography Ppt on digital multimedia broadcasting