Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 National Science Foundation Office of Integrative Activities (OIA) Programs & Activities Dr. Joan M.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 National Science Foundation Office of Integrative Activities (OIA) Programs & Activities Dr. Joan M."— Presentation transcript:

1 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 National Science Foundation Office of Integrative Activities (OIA) Programs & Activities Dr. Joan M. Frye Senior Staff Associate www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=OIA

2 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 "The Office of Integrative Activities has a key role in working across organizational boundaries as well as providing policy support to the Director's Office. Developing effective ways to transcend traditional boundaries, and bring very different scientific cultures together for the benefit of science and society, without compromising excellence, is a critically important challenge for the Foundation." - NSF Director Arden Bement (December, 2007)

3 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 OIA Programs  Science and Technology Centers: Integrative Partnerships (STC)  Major Research Instrumentation (MRI)  Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR)  Cyber-Enabled Discovery & Innovation (CDI)

4 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 STC Vision The STC Program supports innovation in the integrative conduct of research, education and knowledge transfer through partnerships. Dr. Joan M. Frye

5 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 STC History  First Competition  Currently - 17 STCs operational  NSB approved STC Program for competitions every 2-3 years  2008/2009 competition for $25M currently underway

6 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 STC Objectives  Support research & education of the highest quality;  Exploit opportunities in science, engineering & technology where the complexity of the research agenda requires the advantages of scope, scale, flexibility, duration, equipment & facilities that a Center can provide;  Support innovative frontier investigations at the interfaces of disciplines, and/or investigations that will lead to fresh approaches within disciplines;  Engage the Nation's intellectual talent, including underrepresented groups, in the conduct of research & education activities;

7 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 STC Objectives  Promote organizational connections & linkages within & between campuses, schools and/or the world beyond, capitalizing upon cyberinfra- structure to facilitate linkages;  Focus on integrative learning & discovery and the preparation of U.S. students for a broad set of career paths; and  Foster science & engineering in service to society especially with respect to new research areas, promising new instrumentation & potential new technologies.

8 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 STC Evaluation Criteria  NSB-approved merit review criteria –Intellectual merit of the proposal activity –Broader impacts of the proposed activities, including Integration of Research and Education Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities  Program-specific criteria –Value-added of funding the activity as a Center –Proposed Leadership and Management Plan –Integrative nature of the Proposed Center

9 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009STC Profiles in Team Science:

10 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 Randy Phelps, Ph.D. Staff Associate Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) g=OIA

11 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 MRI: Purpose  Increase access to scientific and engineering equipment for research and research training in U.S. academic institutions.  Improve the quality and expand the scope of research and research training in science and engineering, and to foster the integration of research and education by providing instrumentation for research-intensive learning environments.  Encourage the development and acquisition of research instrumentation for shared use across academic departments, among research institutions, and in concert with private sector partners.

12 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 MRI Overview  Instrumentation Acquisition or Development  Two proposals for acquisition or development; a third for development. Award size--$100,000 to $4 Million –exceptions for non-Ph.D. granting institutions or for mathematical and social, behavioral and economic sciences  Cost sharing--None required for non-Ph.D. granting institutions; otherwise 30%  Deadline for proposal submission: 4 th Thursday in January

13 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 MRI: Eligible Institutions  Ph.D. granting institutions –academic institutions that have produced more than 20 Ph.D.s or D. Sci.’s in all NSF supported disciplines during the previous two academic years  Non-Ph.D. granting institutions –two and four year colleges and universities that have produced fewer than 20 Ph.D.s or D.Sci.’s in all NSF supported disciplines during the previous two academic years  Non-degree granting institutions –independent non-profit research institutions, research museums, and legally incorporated consortia of eligible institutions

14 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 MRI: Evaluation Criteria  NSB Approved Merit Review Criteria: –Intellectual merit of the proposed activity –Broader impacts of the proposed activity, including integration of research and education integrating diversity into the proposed activities  Program-specific criteria: –Plans for using the new or enhanced research capability in teaching, training or learning.

15 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 MRI: Evaluation Criteria –Acquisition: reviewers will evaluate whether the management plan includes sufficient infrastructure and technical expertise to allow effective usage of the instrument provides institutional commitments for operations and maintenance. –Development: reviewers will evaluate whether the management plan has a realistic schedule and mechanisms to deal with potential risks the availability of appropriate technical expertise to design and construct the instrument the cost of the new technology the rationale for development of a new instrument.

16 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 MRI 2008 Award Snapshot - Overall Number Reviewed: 810 Dollars Requested : $515.8 million Number of Awards: 224 (39 DEV, 185 ACQ) MRI Amount Awarded: $93.2 million NSF Amount Awarded: $101.0 million Overall Success Rate: 27.7% Mean Award: $451,000 Median Award: $330,000 Number of Institutions that Participated: 449 Number of Institutions Awarded: 184 Data omit 1 MRI award that was made but not using MRI funds

17 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009MRI 2008 Award Snapshot by Institution Type Ph.D.non-Ph.D.Non-degreeMSI # reviewed Mean request$765 K$430 K$704 K$555 K Median request$568 K$323 K$559 K$397 K # awards NSF $ awarded$73.7 M$22.4 M$4.8 M$9.8 M MRI $ awarded$67.8 M$21.2 M$3.9 M$9.3 M Success rate27.3%27.6%32.4%32.0% Mean award$571 K$267 K$440 K$407 K Median award$465 K$211 K$474 K$309 K

18 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009MRI 2008 Award Snapshot - EPSCoR Number of Proposals Reviewed: 181 Dollars Requested : $116.5 M Number of EPSCoR-eligible Awards: 50 Amount Awarded to EPSCoR-eligible Awards: $20.2 M EPSCoR Amount Awarded to MRI Awards: $2.0 M EPSCoR-eligible Success Rate: 27.6% Eligible proposals co-funded by EPSCoR: 17 Mean award: $404,000 Median award: $295,000

19 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009MRI Award Snapshot 1 1 includes only awards submitted directly to MRI program * includes MRI funds and contributions from Directorates and Offices

20 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 Cyber-Enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) Thomas Russell, Ph.D. Senior Staff Associate Themes: From Data to Knowledge Understanding Complexity in Natural, Built and Social Systems Building Virtual Organizations

21 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 CDI Features: Multidisciplinary, transformative research; not business as usual Innovation in, or innovative use of, computational thinking Five-year initiative; $48M in FY08; requested $100M in FY09; projected $250M in FY12 Theory Experiment Simulation Knowledge

22 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research Denise Barnes, Ph.D. Program Director

23 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 EPSCoR’s Origins EPSCoR’s Origins  Have historically received little federal research and development funding; and  Have demonstrated a commitment to develop their research bases and improve science and engineering research and education programs at their universities and colleges.

24 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 EPSCoR Objectives EPSCoR Objectives  To catalyze key research themes and related activities within EPSCoR jurisdictions that empower knowledge generation, dissemination, and application.  To activate effective jurisdictional and regional collaborations among academic, government, and private sector stakeholders that advance scientific research, promote innovation, and provide multiple societal benefits.

25 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 EPSCoR’s Objectives EPSCoR’s Objectives  To broaden participation in science & engineering by institutions, organizations, and people within EPSCoR jurisdictions.  To use EPSCoR for development, implementation, and evaluation of future programmatic experiments that motivate positive change and progression.

26 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 NSF EPSCoR Cohorts FY 1980 Arkansas Maine Montana South Carolina West Virginia FY 1985 FY 1987 FY 1992 FY 2002 FY 2000 FY 2003 FY 2001 FY 2004 Alabama Kentucky Nevada North Dakota Oklahoma Puerto Rico Vermont Wyoming Idaho Louisiana Mississippi South Dakota Kansas Nebraska Alaska Hawaii New Mexico New Hampshire Rhode Island Tennessee U.S. Virgin Islands Delaware

27 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009  Research Infrastructure Improvement Awards Track-1: Up to 5 years and $20M to jurisdictions to improve physical and human infrastructure critical to R&D competitiveness in priority research areas. Track-2: Up to 3 years and $6M to consortia of jurisdictions to support innovation- enabling cyberinfrastructure of regional, thematic, or technological importance. Investment Strategies Investment Strategies

28 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 Investment Strategies Investment Strategies  Co-funding – Joint support of proposals submitted by EPSCoR researchers to NSF’s regular grant programs  Outreach/Workshops - Support of outreach visits by NSF program and professional staff and the conduct of workshops to acquaint EPSCoR researchers with NSF programs, priorities and policies

29 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 EPSCoR States’ Percentage of NSF Research Support Funding

30 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 OIA Activities American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Fellows P roviding opportunities for learning, & input on issues relating to NSF's mission to support fundamental science & engineering research & education. Summer Scholars Internship Program Developing undergraduate & graduate student potential through exposure to science & engineering policy, issues & programs: Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering (CEOSE) Encouraging full participation of women, underrepresented minorities, & persons with disabilities in scientific, engineering, & professional fields: Committee of Visitors (COV) Advising the Foundation to ensure improvement of NSF performance, & openness to the research & education community:

31 ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 OIA Activities National Medal of Science For individuals "deserving of special recognition by reason of their outstanding contributions to knowledge in the physical, biological, mathematical, or engineering sciences.” Presidential Early Career Awards for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) Providing the highest honor bestowed by the United States Government for early career scientists and engineers Waterman Award Recognizing outstanding young researchers in any field of science or engineering supported by the NSF.


Download ppt "ASEE Engineering Research Council Forum March 2009 National Science Foundation Office of Integrative Activities (OIA) Programs & Activities Dr. Joan M."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google