Presentation on theme: "Combining neuropsychology and genetics in the study of mood disorders Daniel Smith MRCPsych Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh Specialist."— Presentation transcript:
Combining neuropsychology and genetics in the study of mood disorders Daniel Smith MRCPsych Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh Specialist Registrar in Psychiatry, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow. firstname.lastname@example.org
Overview – three reports: Recurrent MDD patients versus controls ‘pure unipolar’ patients versus bipolar-spectrum disorder (BSD) patients MDD patients with BDNF gene abnormality versus patients without BDNF gene abnormality
Recurrent early-onset major depressive disorder (RE-MDD) Defined as 2 or more episodes of MDD before age 22 Is highly morbid (Zubenko et al, 2001) Is probably a ‘more genetic’ sub-group of depression (Maher et al, 2002) Carries a high risk of progression to bipolar disorder (Smith et al, in press)
Depression in young adults Clinical characteristics Genetic risk factors ‘endophenotypes’ environmental factors Personality traits Neurocognitive impairment Drugs and alcohol Life events Early adversity Bipolar-spectrum disorders BDNF
Outline of study 234 consecutive referrals in 12 month recruitment period 90 with current depression and at least one previous episode of depression 87 agreed to participate Initial assessment: SCID-1 diagnostic assessment; symptom severity; quality of life; family history; life events; drug and alcohol use; DSH and suicidal behaviour; blood sample for DNA After 3 months on treatment: Symptom severity; Quality of life Neuropsychology assessment Personality dimensions assessment
Neuropsychological impairment in mood disorders Affected by clinical sub-type Lack of study of homogeneous groups Depends on stage of illness ‘endophenotype’ theory versus ‘scarring’ effect May reflect structural brain abnormalities
Cognitive deficits in depression and bipolar disorder across mood states Cognitive domain Cognitive task Euthymic state Depressed state Manic state Attention Continuous performance task (CPT) Trail-making Test, part A (TMT-A) Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No ? Executive function Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) Stroop test Trail-making Test, part B (TMT-B) Yes Yes Yes ? ? Yes Yes Yes ? Verbal memory California Verbal learning Test (CVLT) Yes Yes Yes
Brain regions implicated in mood disorders Prefrontal cortex Dorsolateral: –Verbal memory –Attention –Executive function Anterior cingulate: –Executive function Hippocampus –Verbal memory
Neuropsychological battery in this study Assessed for clinical recovery (euthymia) using HRSD (<8) Estimate of intellectual functioning: National Adult Reading Test (NART) Number of years in full-time education Block design sub-section score of the WAIS-R Verbal memory: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) Executive function: Stroop Colour Word Test Brixton spatial anticipation test Trail-making test A and B
Patients and controls were well matched CharacteristicMDD patients (n=63) Mean (SD) Controls (n=33) Mean (SD ) Significance test and p- value Age (years) Gender ratio (F:M) 21.7 (2.25) 43:20 22.2 (2.29) 19:14 t=-1.22, df=94, p<0.03 X 2 =1.08, df=2, p<0.30 NART IQ Block design (WAIS) Education (years) HRSD score 117.5 (3.56) 44.9 (5.96) 16.7 (1.59) 2.6 (1.95) 115.9 (3.69) 45.8 (3.13) 17.3 (1.40) 1.9 (0.93) t=2.02, df=94, p<0.05 t=-0.85, df=94, p<0.40 t=-1.93, df=94, p<0.06 t=1.71, df=94, p<0.09 Current medications: Antidepressants only, n (%) Mood stabilisers only, n (%) Both, n (%) Neither, n (%) 48 (76.2) 8 (12.7) 6 (9.5) 1 (1.4) 00000000 ---
Results (1): MDD patients versus controls Verbal learning and memory (CVLT) MDD patients (n=63) Mean (SD) Controls (n=33) Mean (SD) Significance test Trial 1 Trials 1 to 5 total Short delay recall Long delay recall Delayed recognition minus false positives 7.0 (1.85) 55.2 (8.42) 12.5 (2.69) 12.6 (2.64) 14.7 (1.49) 7.7 (1.79) 60.7 (6.57) 13.5 (1.91) 13.9 (1.98) 15.2 (1.00) t=-1.85, df=94, p<0.07 t=-3.30, df=94, p<0.001 t=-1.77, df=94, p<0.08 t=-2.47, df=94, p<0.01 t=-1.4, df=94, p<0.16
Results (2): MDD patients versus controls Attention and executive function MDD patients (n=63) Mean (SD) Controls (n=33) Mean (SD) Significance test Stroop colour trial correct Stroop colour word trial correct Brixton test Trail-making Part A (s) Trail-making Part B (s) 111.6 (0.63) 109.1 (2.58) 6.8 (1.67) 30.3 (8.0) 58.6 (16.4) 111.7 (0.47) 110.4 (1.17) 7.4 (1.62) 29.0 (35.3) 45.3 (10.9) t=-0.50, df=94, p<0.62 t=-2.77, df=94, p<0.01 t=-1.78, df=94, p<0.08 t=0.28, df=94, p<0.78 t=4.27, df=94, p<0.0001
Conclusion: MDD patients versus controls Subtle impairments in: –Verbal memory –CVLT trials 1 to 5 total –Executive function –Stroop Colour Word errors –Trail-making Part B
Young people with recurrent depression are at high risk of progression to bipolar disorder 19% of out-patient depressed adolescents develop bipolar disorder 1 47% of young adults hospitalised with depression develop bipolar disorder 2 Bipolar illnesses tend begin with an episode of depression rather than mania 3 Most people with bipolar disorder date the onset of their illness to adolescence 3 1.Rao et al., 1995, J. Am. Acad. Child & Adol. Psych., 34, 566-578. 2.Goldberg et al., 2001, Am. J. Psych., 158, 1265-1270. 3.Lisj et al., 1994, J. Aff. Disord., 31, 281-294.
Diagnostic criteria for bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD) Aat least one major depressive episode Bno spontaneous DSM-IV hypomanic or manic episodes Ceither of the following plus two from D or both plus one from D: First degree relative with bipolar disorder Antidepressant-induced mania or hypomania Dif none from C, at least six of the following: Hyperthymic personality > 3 depressive episodes Brief major depressive episodes (< 3 months) Atypical depressive symptoms Psychotic major depressive episodes Early age of onset (< 25) Postpartum depression Antidepressant ‘wear-off’ (acute but not prophylactic response) Lack of response to > 2 antidepressant trials Ghaemi, S.N., Ko, J.Y., Goodwin, F.K., Cade's Disease and beyond: misdiagnosis, antidepressant use and a proposed definition for bipolar spectrum disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2002. 47(2): p. 125-134.
Diagnoses (using diagnostic criteria for bipolar spectrum disorder, BSD) Smith, D.J., Harrison, N., Muir, W., Blackwood, D.H.R., High prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorders in young adults with recurrent depression: toward a novel diagnostic framework. Journal of Affective Disorders., in press.
‘pure unipolar’ patients versus BSD patients: CVLT, trials 1-5 Controls > DSM-IV MDD; p<0.001 Controls > BSD; p<0.001 Pure unipolar > BSD; p<0.06 Mean score CVLT trials 1-5
‘pure unipolar’ patients versus BSD patients: Stroop Colour Word Test errors BSD > Controls; p<0.002 BSD > ‘pure unipolar’; N.S. MDD > Controls; N.S.
Conclusion: ‘pure MDD’ patients versus BSD patients BSD patients appear to have more impairment in: –Verbal memory (CVLT, trials 1-5) –Executive function (Trail-making test, part B) Indirect support for the validity of the proposed diagnostic criteria for BSD
Manji, H. (2003) American Journal of Psychiatry 160 (1) 24. Intracellular signalling pathways mediating cellular resilience and neuroplasticity
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Is a neurotrophin found in the neocortex, hippocampus and amygdala 1 Modulates hippocampal plasticity and hippocampal-dependant memory 1 Is upregulated by antidepressant therapy 2 Is associated with bipolar affective disorder 3,4 1.Lu & Gottschalk (2000) Progress in Brain Research, 128:231-241 2.Reid & Stewart (2001) British Journal of Psychiatry, 178:299-303 3.Neves-Pereira et al. (2002) American Journal of Human Genetics, 71:651-655 4.Sklar et al. (2002) Molecular Psychiatry, 7:579-593
The Val66Met polymorphism of BDNF –Single nucleotide polymorphism at nucleotide 196 (G/A; dbSNP number rs6265) produces an amino acid substitution at codon 66 (Val66Met) –Approximate frequencies in human controls: 68% val/val 27% val/met 5% met/met
The BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependant secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Egan et al., (2003) Cell, 112;257-269. –met allele associated with: Poorer episodic memory Abnormal hippocampal activation on fMRI Lower hippocampal intracellular N-acetyl aspartate –val/met exerts these effects through intracellular trafficking and activity-dependant secretion of BDNF
Bipolar patients carrying the Met allele of the BDNF polymorphism perform worse on the Wisconsin Card Sort Test Rybakowski et al (2003) Bipolar Disorders, 5(6):468-472 Val/Val (n=44) Mean (SD) Val/Met (n=9) Mean (SD) Significance test Perseverative errors10.5 (5.0)17.0 (15.6)P < 0.03 Non-perseverative errors9.8 (5.5)15.9 (15.2)P < 0.04
Is this polymorphism associated with cognitive impairment in young adults with recurrent depression?
Genotype frequencies in this sample of MDD patients (n=40) 24 patients were val/val 15 were val/met = 16 with at least one met allele 1 was met/met
Val/Val genotype N=24 Mean (SD) Val/Met or Met/Met genotype N=16 Mean (SD) Significance test Age21.7 (2.28)22.1 (1.88)N.S. F:M ratio2:13:1N.S. MADRS score2.92 (2.02)3.06 (1.78)N.S. Premorbid IQ: Number of years of full- time education NART error score Full-scale IQ Block design WAIS 16.8 (1.69) 10.5 (2.17) 117.7 (2.71) 44.9 (6.87) 16.9 (1.50) 10.1 (2.60) 118.1 (3.30) 46.9 (3.63) N.S. Comparison groups were well-matched:
Val/Val genotype N=24 Mean (SD) Val/Met or Met/Met genotype N=16 Mean (SD) Significance test CVLT (trials 1-5)55.3 (8.8)55.1 (8.1)N.S. Brixton raw score13.0 (4.15)12.5 (4.00)N.S. Trailmaking A Trailmaking B B-A 28.8 (6.01) 53.1 (9.05) 24.3 (8.49) 29.6 (7.47) 65.3 (21.1) 37.8 (19.7) N.S. P < 0.04 Stroop C errors Stroop CW errors 0.21 (0.41) 2.17 (2.06) 0.50 (0.63) 4.56 (3.54) N.S. P < 0.02 Neuropsychological assessment:
Conclusions re: BDNF Neurocognitive abnormalities associated with this polymorphism of BDNF are not limited to hippocampal impairment In recurrent, early-onset major depression the val66met BDNF polymorphism is associated with impaired frontal executive function but not with hippocampal impairment Is this a reflection of a bipolar diathesis in these young recurrently depressed patients?
Final Summary Subtle frontal and hippocampal impairments in euthymic young adults with recurrent depression compared to controls –Is this an endophenotypic characteristic? Neuropsychological support for the proposed diagnostic criteria for bipolar-spectrum disorder (BSD) Possible to demonstrate that abnormalities of genes implicated in cognitive function and risk for mood disorder are associated with cognitive deficits in recovered patients
Acknowledgments Funded by the Kate Hodgson Memorial Fellowship, University of Edinburgh and by the Health Foundation UK Psychiatric genetics research group in Edinburgh: –Douglas Blackwood –Walter Muir –David Porteous –Maura Walker –Margaret van Beck Genotypying lab at the University of Dundee: –Murray Wilkie –Gillian Smith –Roland Wolf Thanks to general practitioners at the University Health Service in Bristo Square, Edinburgh and community mental health team at Ballendon House, Edinburgh