Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

168 Doug Raters, P.E. ODOT District 8 REA PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "168 Doug Raters, P.E. ODOT District 8 REA PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN."— Presentation transcript:

1 168 Doug Raters, P.E. ODOT District 8 REA PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

2 169 Section 3200 Types of Title PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

3 170 Section 3200 Types of Title PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

4 171 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Section 3200 Types of Title

5 172 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

6 173 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN  Construction Limits Defines minimum R/W required. Drawn +/- four feet beyond intersection of proposed back or fill slope and ex. ground line. Will include removal of any item inside proposed limits; signs, parking areas, structures, trees, (may include root system outside right of way limits)

7 174

8 175 Construction Limits

9 176

10 177 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN  Establishing Right of Way Lines & Widths “The State shall acquire rights of way of such nature and extent as they are adequate for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a project.” Right of Way line, either permanent or temporary MUST encompass all construction limits. Factors to consider before establishing final R/W lines: Utilities Drainage Terrain Maintenance of Traffic Anticipated traffic volumes Access Land Use Future Maintenance Stage Construction Area Real Estate Values

11 178 WAR

12 179 Station

13 180 Station

14 181 Station

15 182 Station

16 183 Station

17 184 Station

18 185 When right of way is acquired at the begin/end of a project, consider acquisition thru the entire parcel…..

19 186 Proposed R/W Design - Limited Access 600’

20 187 Proposed R/W Design - Limited Access

21 188 Proposed R/W Design - Limited Access

22 189 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN  Determining Types of Right of Way Parcel Takes Fee vs. Standard Highway Easement consider: Existing Right of Way Type of Title Most beneficial to owner (ODOT or Property) Property owner conflicts in the area Type of development in the area: Residential vs Commercial vs Industrial Encroachments Right of Way funding type (Federal/State/LPA) Mood of property owners being effected Ownership of PRO (present road occupied)

23 190 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Cost effectiveness of Real Estate vs. Construction Design Must have open communications between R/W Design & Roadway Design Avoidance and proximity High Impacts on Real Estate vs. Tailored Construction Design

24 191 15’ …..a R/W line too far...

25

26 193

27 194

28 195 68’ 48’ 53’

29 196 58’ 35’ 40’

30 197 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Total Takes and/or Land Locked Parcels In Step 6 (Major), Step 3 (Minor) –The design agency shall identify total take or landlocked parcels. –Residential or commercial structures Excess Land Protective buys/Hardship acquisition Property Rights

31 198 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN EXCESS LAND

32 199 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN EXCESS LAND

33 200 Maintenance of Traffic

34 201 M.O.T.

35 202 M.O.T.

36 203 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Property Rights

37 204 Property Rights PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

38 205 Property Rights PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

39 206 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN ACCESS

40 207

41 208

42 209

43 210

44 211 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN  Establishing Right of Way Lines and Widths Begin/End of

45 212 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Encroachments and ADC Permit Plate No. –Check advertising devices for valid permits –Locate and show all encroachments within existing R/W

46 213 ENCROACHMENTS Encroachments

47 214 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Access Control, Rules and Regulations ODOT’s goal to manage highway system effectively, reduce congestion, improve safety, operation. Access Management Manual

48 215 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Drives- Commercial, Residential Etc. Identify ALL existing drives/access points. Review, evaluate drives to be relocated/closed. Appropriate drive widths Existing permits

49 216 ACCESS MANAGEMENT

50 216

51 217 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Drainage –Some major items of concern are: Open water course (ditches) Channels Storm sewers Catch basins Manholes Culverts Headwalls Field tiles Erosion control Post construction storm water management

52 218 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Utility Conflicts and Relocation Railroad Property Adherence to Environment Document

53 219 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Post Construction Storm Water Management Plan An example of a non-structural BMP would be street sweeping. Structural BMPs include the following: Vegetated Swales and Strips Infiltration Basins Infiltration Trenches Extended Detention (dry ponds) Retention Basins (wet ponds) Constructed Wetlands Bioretention Cells Manufactured Systems

54 220 Utilities

55 221 Utility Relocation Needs (2) Utilities

56 222 Proposed R/W Design - Railroad Plat

57 223 Proposed R/W Design - Railroad Plat

58 224 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN Environmental Concerns - Adherence to Environmental Document

59 225 Environmental Concerns - Adherence to Environmental Document PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

60 226 Environmental Concerns - Adherence to Environmental Document PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN

61 227 Channel Easements-CH

62 228 Sewer -S

63 229 Temporary-T, problems?

64 230 Utility Easements-U

65 231 Avoid Headaches! If anything is unclear or there are issues or concerns, contact the District Real Estate Administrator early in the R/W design process.


Download ppt "168 Doug Raters, P.E. ODOT District 8 REA PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DESIGN."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google