Individual Growth and Development Plan with 35% Student Growth Data Peer Review Student Engagement Walkthrough Data Summative Evaluation
Completed annually by all staff members Baseline data needed Aligned to building strategic plan Goal tied to a measurable student data point Principal approval of goal Mid-year check Individual assesses his/her student data using rubric Individual Growth and Development Plan
Embedded in your IGDP Teacher-created goals including valid and reliable assessment Incorporated into summative evaluation A zero in the rubric will result in a PIP Calculated over the course of three years as opposed to just one year
Completed annually by tenured staff only Teacher selects partner Completed by March 31 st Confidential Peer Observation
Done by administrators during walk-throughs Evaluated as part of Danielson
Danielson Framework will be utilized 65% of evaluation based on Danielson Once every three years for tenured staff
Remember Education Minnesota and Minnesota School Board Association agree that local districts and associations should create a plan. Vote on December 4 th !
Teacher Representatives (Building Locations) ◦ Brandon Button ( I.J. Holton) ◦ Jens Levisen (High School) ◦ Jill Rollie (Ellis) ◦ Erin Schoen (Southgate) ◦ John Sullivan (Specialist and AEA executive committee) ◦ Greg Wehner (Special Ed Rep) Administrative Representatives (Locations) ◦ John Alberts (District Office Educational Services) ◦ Brad Bergstrom (High School) ◦ Mary Burroughs (District Office Human Resources) ◦ Jessica Cabeen (Woodson) ◦ Edwina Harder (Southgate)